• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

So prolifers want to "get back to the Hippocratic oath"? Fine. Then do it proper

A prolifer is attempting to lecture me about honesty? :lol:

Why not? You are a pro-abort. By definition, you trade in at least intellectual dishonesty, but in practice you specifically trade in a lot of the normal kind.


The classic oath does mention old deities. Acknowledged, and noted to be irrelevant. That's like the beginning and the end of discussing your entire point here. Which means you didn't have much of one.
 
Why not? You are a pro-abort. By definition, you trade in at least intellectual dishonesty, but in practice you specifically trade in a lot of the normal kind.


The classic oath does mention old deities. Acknowledged, and noted to be irrelevant. That's like the beginning and the end of discussing your entire point here. Which means you didn't have much of one.

Everything you need is in Posts #56-57. I refer you back to there.
 
Read 'em. Nothing relevant. Waste of time.

I accept your surrender. At least you realize that that's the right move for you.
 
I accept your surrender. At least you realize that that's the right move for you.

Yeah, noting that your stupid and irrelevant thread about how the Hippocratic Oath isn't relevant as a concept because it mentions Apollo is stupid and irrelevant and pointless... what a "surrender" on my part.

:lol:
 
Yeah, noting that your stupid and irrelevant thread about how the Hippocratic Oath isn't relevant as a concept because it mentions Apollo is stupid and irrelevant and pointless... what a "surrender" on my part.

:lol:

He wasn't really even careful with his wording and he got chewed out for that by a few other pro lifers.
 
There is a reason they changed the oath and it's not because of the first line, but because they couldn't live up to the old standards and didn't desire too.
 
There is a reason they changed the oath and it's not because of the first line, but because they couldn't live up to the old standards and didn't desire too.

My kids' pediatrician, who began practicing about 35 years ago, told me that his med school class chose not to take the Hippocratic Oath but another one instead. One issue was the changing definition of "death."
 
From time to time, we hear from the prolifers that we need to get back to the Hippocratic oath: "First, do no harm." That never appears anywhere in any accepted version of the oath. Or, "I will not give to a woman a pessary to cause abortion." OK fine, if you're going to play that game, let's set aside for the moment just how frequently doctors tend to overlook their women patients' needs when it comes to childbirth, whether that be the desire to have no C-section except as a last resort, or particular accommodations for the newborn, or pushing mothers out of hospitals before they may be ready, etc. No, if we really want to "get back to the Hippocratic oath," then we should go back to the first line of the original oath:

"I swear by Apollo the Healer, by Asclepius, by Hygieia, by Panacea, and by all the gods and goddesses, making them my witnesses, that I will carry out, according to my ability and judgment, this oath and this indenture."

No Jesus. No Jehova Rapha (God the healer). Nope, we're going old school, all the way back to the Greek gods.

So, prolifers, if you still want to make the Hippocratic oath as a part of your arsenal, the very least you could do is actually read it first and not insert your Jesus into something that never had it in the first place.


I'm sorry, but what is the big advantage of leaving Jesus out of the Hippocratic oath?
 
I'm sorry, but what is the big advantage of leaving Jesus out of the Hippocratic oath?

Because it was never there in the first place.
 
Back
Top Bottom