• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Federal judge blocks two of Missouri's abortion restrictions

true, but with me rights comes before my opinion, it comes last

the law of the land has abortion as legal, therefore i have to honor the law.

but being that abortion is legal, does not mean my tax payer dollars should go for it.

government has no delegated power to give money to anyone, but only to pay for debt

I don't know what the situation is in China, but in the USA, where most posters here are from, federal funds cannot cover abortion unless it's for life/health of the woman or the pregnancy was from rape or incest and the woman is on medicaid. Here in Canada, it is covered under our universal health care system, but so is gestation and delivery. My opinion is either cover both or none. Some don't want their tax money to pay for abortion, but some don't want theirs to pay for welfare queens to have more children.
 
Back
Top Bottom