The #1 thing we should be talking about

Bucky said:

D, I'm not sure what is so difficult to understand.

If you do not want to be pregnant;

a. don't have sex

if you do have sex;

b. use protection

Problem solved.

Click to expand...

You forgot the other choice, which is actual CHOICE? If you accidentally get pregnant but aren't ready for the responsibility of motherhood, see your doctor and have the fetus removed. Any conversation about birth control that doesn't include abortion is incomplete, like a discussion of comb-overs that excludes Trump.

To be repetitiously factual, abortion is a women's medical issue, not a male political one. While you are welcome to your poorly thought out opinion, realize that the hands of the religious establishment better stay off of my family. Pretend, if it pleases you, that women deserve your judgment and death sentence but they actually deserve better. If ever authoritarian theocrats wrestle away hard-won human rights from women they will suffer at the hands of their fellow men who understand the gravity of their treachery.

It seems like there is no reverence for reason and no shame left in politics. Empowered by senseless faith, a small minority of imbeciles are attempting to drag our society back to a time in which their ideas didn't seem so crazy. I'm disgusted by the entire notion of free religion when it manifests so often as cover for people who have no standard of conduct or thought.

Oh, who will save the poor little babies?! The answer...women with rights will.

Tanngrisnir said:

LOL! More dishonest and long debunked nonsense.

Why do you expect people to believe you worked at PP, and why did you run away from your claims yesterday?

Click to expand...

He needs a intricate charting system with cross references to keep track of the confabulations.

Removable Mind said:

Hmmmm, thinking about how you've phrased that...you're right, women's biological purpose, DNA, yadda, yadda, yadda etc, etc, really doesn't have any bearing on the abortion debate.

Click to expand...

Pretty much and considering the fact "people" have this thing called "free will" that pretty much renders any opposition to something on a biological basis moot.

GEIxBattleRifle said:

Pretty much and considering the fact "people" have this thing called "free will" that pretty much renders any opposition to something on a biological basis moot.

Click to expand...

Apparently free will is for secular folks only.

FutureIncoming said:

FACTS ARE FACTS. God did not sit down somewhere and write the Bible. Humans wrote it, and humans are well-known to tell lies to benefit themselves. So, when Moses created a government of the People, by the Preachers, and for the Preachers (see Deuteronomy 17:9-12), he put himself at the top of the social heap. No one could get away with doing something like that today, with all the rules against conflict-of-interest. And it is plainly obvious from both the Bible and the historical record that preachers got very rich, indeed, while insisting that only reproductive sexual activity was "moral".



A TOTALLY FALSE OBSERVATION IS STILL A TOTALLY FALSE OBSERVATION. It should be obvious that if God has no problem with abortion (and we all know what claims are most often made about God, like "smart" and "knowledgeable" and "loving"), then no one will be condemned for it.


IF MY WORDS STRIKE YOU LIKE A SLAP IN THE FACE, IT IS DELIBERATE. The idiocies and lies and hypocrisies so-routinely spouted by abortion opponents deserve that sort of response!

I notice you didn't challenge my claim that if God is smart and knowledgeable and loving, then it logically follows that God has no problem with abortion. Do I get to assume you have seen the logic of that before, and cannot point out an error in it? Because if that is true, why are you still spouting the idiocy of claiming abortion leads to Godly condemnation?

Click to expand...

Nope. I don't strike me like a slap in the face. They only seem those of poor upbringing and a sadly lacking level of topical information.

joG said:

Nope. I don't strike me like a slap in the face.

Click to expand...

OF COURSE NOT. You intend for your blatherings to affect others!

joG said:

They only seem those of poor upbringing and a sadly lacking level of topical information.

Click to expand...

SOUNDS LIKE YOU ARE BRAGGING ABOUT YOUR BLATHERINGS. You certainly didn't point out anything specific, regarding anything someone else wrote!

So? If someone wants to be increase there chance in dying they have a right to that. By that logic we should ban anything that hurts someones health which makes no sense if someone wants to kill themselves by increasing there chances of getting cancer that is not the governments job or anybodys but there own