• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Choices [W:1315]

I believe that Republicans are interested in ...
ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS. I described certain actions. And the net effect of those actions, in accordance with the Law of Supply and Demand, is to cause the rich to get richer and everyone else to get poorer.

First you claim suicide is illegal, then you explain that murder is illegal.
THEY MIGHT THINK SUICIDE EQUALS MURDER OF SELF, but no one who ever did it has ever been charged with a crime.

The right to live and the lack of a right to cause death aren't the same thing ....
MOSTLY BECAUSE IT IS OFTEN ASSUMED THAT OTHERS ARE PART OF THE SITUATION. There is nevertheless some Choice involved. Right to life (as well as any other right) can only exist if many people choose to act as if it existed. Every participant can expect to not be arbitrarily killed, in return for choosing to not arbitrarily kill. In a way, suicide can be interpreted as choosing to become a killer, thereby forfeiting any claim of right-to-life --which makes oneself the only legitimately killable target!

But what do you think of the right to survive a natural disaster, or an accident?
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS RIGHT-TO-LIFE IN NATURE. It is purely a tool created by persons for use by persons, to help them get-along with each other better.

No, I simply refuse to acknowledge the false justice which does not honor my right to due process.
YOU MEAN YOU WANT TO BE PROVED TO HAVE ACTED STUPIDLY, IN A COURT OF LAW? Looks pretty cut-and-dried to me, if you are guilty of helping to bring into existence another mouth-to-feed.

For every woman who has the right to abort a process that leads to her motherhood, there also must be a man who may abort his fatherhood.
STUPIDLY BAD LOGIC. That's because you refuse, as I previously stated, to include all the relevant factors. Like the factor that an unborn human commits assault upon its hostess at least 4 different ways, and therefore abortion can simply be an act of self-defense. There need not be the slightest hint of a woman trying to get out of motherhood! PLUS, there is the factor that men generally KNOW that if they are involved in creating a new human, they can be held responsible for child support --and therefore if they Stupidly Ignore That Knowledge, it means they deserve the consequences! Very much like deserving to catch a disease by ignoring knowledge of safe sex. Stupidity Always Has A Price. PERIOD.
 
Back
Top Bottom