• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tomi Lahren's support of abortion

Tanngrisnir said:
It's OK that you can't accept the consequences of pretending to assume that words actually have meanings, because in doing so you'd have to admit abortion simply isn't murder.

That seems to have you in an emotional tailspin.

Oh, well.
Click to expand...
It seems you keep confusing my posts with your own. Start over, try again, maybe you will get it right eventually.
 
prometeus said:
So you have signs to demonstrate the stupidity of your post, but nothing relevant or factual. I am surprised...
Click to expand...

Go back and look it up. I did the research last time... but it, apparently, didn't get through the mountain of BS you used to shield yourself from the truth. Not doing that again, its wasted time, wasted on you.
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
Go back and look it up. I did the research last time... but it, apparently, didn't get through the mountain of BS you used to shield yourself from the truth. Not doing that again, its wasted time, wasted on you.
Click to expand...
You are asking me to look for support of your assertion? You said it you prove it, but obviously you can not.
 
Bucky said:
She bases her support of abortion on the concept of limited government. The government doesn't have the right to regulate her body.

Tomi Lahren is sadly misguided. The government has every right to regulate our lives in regards to morality. We make laws against murder, rape, incest, theft. Abortion is an act of killing a life form thus is categorized as a moral issue.

An abortion is a pure violation of our natural laws. Abortion was and still is a moral issue. I find her views completely reprehensible and destructive to our society.

Tomi Lahren is a fake political commentator seeking popularity and fame.
Click to expand...

If she wanted popularity and fame she would have said she was pro-life and be the rightist darling she was.

And I may not agree with her limited government political opinions but at least she has the gust and the honesty to not be hypocritical like the other limited government people who talk limited one moment but throw that limited talk into a deep ditch as soon as they want to interfere in the private business of a woman (you know anti-choice people) who hate the government when they interfere in their business but cheer on the government if they totally violate the private rights of women.

Abortion is not a violation of natural laws, there is no natural law, there are just man made laws and man made guarantees of rights in those laws. We make laws against murder, rape, etc. etc. because they happen when one person illegally violates the rights of another person by killing, raping, etc. etc.

Abortion is a private medical decision in which (within reason) the government has no business being involved in except in safe guarding that woman's health by making sure the doctors who perform that medical procedure do this medically sound and in accordance with health code issues. The choice of a woman itself is none of the governments business.
 
prometeus said:
You are asking me to look for support of your assertion? You said it you prove it, but obviously you can not.
Click to expand...
No, wrong once again.

Not a real shocker, however.

I SAID GO LOOK UP WHERE I PROVED THIS TO YOU BEFORE. Do you get that? Is there a manner of explication that I might use to make it even simpler for you to understand what I am trying to tell you? Or... is there a person there that you can ask to help you understand?

I simply am not going back and doing the research again so you can in two months ask me to prove it to you again.
 
Peter King said:
If she wanted popularity and fame she would have said she was pro-life and be the rightist darling she was.

And I may not agree with her limited government political opinions but at least she has the gust and the honesty to not be hypocritical like the other limited government people who talk limited one moment but throw that limited talk into a deep ditch as soon as they want to interfere in the private business of a woman (you know anti-choice people) who hate the government when they interfere in their business but cheer on the government if they totally violate the private rights of women.

Abortion is not a violation of natural laws, there is no natural law, there are just man made laws and man made guarantees of rights in those laws. We make laws against murder, rape, etc. etc. because they happen when one person illegally violates the rights of another person by killing, raping, etc. etc.

Abortion is a private medical decision in which (within reason) the government has no business being involved in except in safe guarding that woman's health by making sure the doctors who perform that medical procedure do this medically sound and in accordance with health code issues. The choice of a woman itself is none of the governments business.
Click to expand...

We have laws against incest even if the relationship is mutual. Abortion is an abomination and woman that are committing abortion need to be punished for their reckless decisions.
 
Last edited:
Bucky said:
We have laws against incest even if the relationship is mutual. Abortion is an abomination and woman that are committing abortion need to be punished for their reckless decisions.
Click to expand...

Sounds rather Calvinist to me.
 
Bucky said:
We have laws against incest even if the relationship is mutual. Abortion is an abomination and woman that are committing abortion need to be punished for their reckless decisions.
Click to expand...

There is no mutual relationship in incest, to even suggest that is totally ridiculous.

Abortion is a woman's right, the only abomination is taking a woman's freedom to choose.
 
Peter King said:
There is no mutual relationship in incest, to even suggest that is totally ridiculous.

Abortion is a woman's right, the only abomination is taking a woman's freedom to choose.
Click to expand...

Of course you can have a relationship with your blood relative. What are YOU talking about?

Why are you trying to regulate who a person has sex with?
 
Last edited:
Bucky said:
Of course you can have a relationship with your blood relative. What are YOU talking about?

Why are you trying to regulate who a person has sex with?
Click to expand...

:roll:

insane, simply insane.
 
Bucky said:
It is legal in many countries.
Click to expand...

You and I do not live in many countries. We live in countries where the law does not allow such disgusting things.
 
Harshaw said:
:screwy
Click to expand...
AND YET ANOTHER ABORTION OPPONENT IS REDUCED TO GENERIC DENUNCIATION, the result of being unable to present an anti-abortion argument that is actually based on Objective Fact and Good Logic, and the result of being unable to find any actual flaws in a pro-choice argument that really is based on Objective Fact and Good Logic. Tsk, tsk!
 
Tomi is 100% correct that no supporter of "small government" can be in favor of banning abortion without being a hypocrite.

Why?

Because to truly ban abortions, we would have to monitor every potential pregnancy in the country. Drug stores would have to report who bought a pregnancy test, and file the results. Then, someone who tests positive for pregnancy would have to prove she carried the baby to term or had a natural miscarriage---good luck with that--to ensure she did not have an "illegal" abortion. Clinics would have to be policed to ensure they are not providing "illegal" abortions on the sly. Hell, we would literally need an abortion prevention police force to enforce such a ridiculous law.

Hence....definitely not a small government issue that can be supported by any person identifying as a libertarian.
 
calamity said:
Tomi is 100% correct that no supporter of "small government" can be in favor of banning abortion without being a hypocrite.

Why?

Because to truly ban abortions, we would have to monitor every potential pregnancy in the country. Drug stores would have to report who bought a pregnancy test, and file the results. Then, someone who tests positive for pregnancy would have to prove she carried the baby to term or had a natural miscarriage---good luck with that--to ensure she did not have an "illegal" abortion. Clinics would have to be policed to ensure they are not providing "illegal" abortions on the sly. Hell, we would literally need an abortion prevention police force to enforce such a ridiculous law.

Hence....definitely not a small government issue that can be supported by any person identifying as a libertarian.
Click to expand...

That is simply nonsensical and you know it.
 
Peter King said:
You and I do not live in many countries. We live in countries where the law does not allow such disgusting things.
Click to expand...

Why do you want to legislate who a person has a relationship with?

I am assuming you are against gay marriage as well then?
 
Bucky said:
Why do you want to legislate who a person has a relationship with?

I am assuming you are against gay marriage as well then?
Click to expand...

Why I want to legislate an incest relationship? :roll:

Nope, 2 consenting adults who are not related can have a marriage if they choose to have one. Brothers and sisters, hell no, just no, fathers and daughters hello no again, etc. etc. etc. etc.
 
Looks like Tomi is this month's Megyn Kelly. I see the Right is all over her on youtube, print, twitter, etc. for daring to speak her mind. I guess that is what you get for pandering to crazy people.
 
calamity said:
Looks like Tomi is this month's Megyn Kelly. I see the Right is all over her on youtube, print, twitter, etc. for daring to speak her mind. I guess that is what you get for pandering to crazy people.
Click to expand...

Tomi Lahren is a nothing. Her career won't amount to anything unless she does porn.
 
Bucky said:
She bases her support of abortion on the concept of limited government. The government doesn't have the right to regulate her body.

Tomi Lahren is sadly misguided. The government has every right to regulate our lives in regards to morality. We make laws against murder, rape, incest, theft. Abortion is an act of killing a life form thus is categorized as a moral issue.

An abortion is a pure violation of our natural laws. Abortion was and still is a moral issue. I find her views completely reprehensible and destructive to our society.

Tomi Lahren is a fake political commentator seeking popularity and fame.
Click to expand...

Those are all examples of one person committing a violent act against another person...

...so... your logic FAILS miserably...
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
She is a sharp girl, like most of her views but she just is on the wrong side of this one. This is about murdering innocents... I am sure, with age and experience, she will come around.
Click to expand...

Or better yet she will age and come to understand that she was correct all along...
 
Bucky said:
Tomi Lahren is a nothing. Her career won't amount to anything unless she does porn.
Click to expand...

Which would make her career more successful than yours by leaps and bounds?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom