• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Anti-choice propaganda about parenting

AtlantaAdonis

AtlantaAdonis

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
2,383
Reaction score
717
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
https://www.yahoo.com/news/parenthood-linked-longer-life-study-234045380.html

I will bet anyone money some kind of socially-conservative religious group is behind this study. They are just trying to shame women who aren't going to let being a mom shape their self worth. All scientific and medical journals should refuse to publish articles that originate from socially-conservative groups.
 
AtlantaAdonis said:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/parenthood-linked-longer-life-study-234045380.html

I will bet anyone money some kind of socially-conservative religious group is behind this study. They are just trying to shame women who aren't going to let being a mom shape their self worth. All scientific and medical journals should refuse to publish articles that originate from socially-conservative groups.
Click to expand...

This stupid nonsense you are spewing has nothing to do with this subforum.

This research is in Europe.

No one is "anti-choice," pro-abort.
 
AtlantaAdonis said:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/parenthood-linked-longer-life-study-234045380.html

I will bet anyone money some kind of socially-conservative religious group is behind this study. They are just trying to shame women who aren't going to let being a mom shape their self worth. All scientific and medical journals should refuse to publish articles that originate from socially-conservative groups.
Click to expand...

Meh. Some of that links to common sense. Usually when people have kids they stop partying so hard, and that alone would lengthen one's lifespan.
 
AtlantaAdonis said:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/parenthood-linked-longer-life-study-234045380.html

I will bet anyone money some kind of socially-conservative religious group is behind this study. They are just trying to shame women who aren't going to let being a mom shape their self worth. All scientific and medical journals should refuse to publish articles that originate from socially-conservative groups.
Click to expand...

Teh. An article in a scientific journal tells you something you'd rather not believe, so you reject it, and speculate as to its origins, speculation not backed up in the story at ALL.

Teheh. Tell me more about how the people you disagree with are "anti-science."
 
I'm not sure I get what's "anti-choice" about that study.
 
Being a parent is a selfless act.

Aborting your child is a selfish act.

Keep this in mind.
 
AtlantaAdonis said:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/parenthood-linked-longer-life-study-234045380.html

I will bet anyone money some kind of socially-conservative religious group is behind this study. They are just trying to shame women who aren't going to let being a mom shape their self worth. All scientific and medical journals should refuse to publish articles that originate from socially-conservative groups.
Click to expand...

Actually this is old news. They have known that marriage benefits men and not women for years now. Just to point to a few studies;
https://ifstudies.org/blog/why-men-resist-marriage-even-though-they-benefit-the-most-from-it/
Does Marriage Help You Live Longer? - Men's Journal
Marriage Might Benefit Men?s Health More
 
AtlantaAdonis said:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/parenthood-linked-longer-life-study-234045380.html

I will bet anyone money some kind of socially-conservative religious group is behind this study. They are just trying to shame women who aren't going to let being a mom shape their self worth. All scientific and medical journals should refuse to publish articles that originate from socially-conservative groups.
Click to expand...

Actually most research of the last ten years comes to similar results. What might surprise a little is the conclusion is missed. If children are fulfillment and the parents profit by having a satisfying and much longer life, while every child adds to a severely overpopulated globe.....
Yes. Why do we subsidize parents and not tax them higher? Considering they collect social security longer and drive up health care costs, while their children produce a multiple of maybe eight times the sustainable co2, if scientists are telling us the truth....
 
AtlantaAdonis said:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/parenthood-linked-longer-life-study-234045380.html

I will bet anyone money some kind of socially-conservative religious group is behind this study. They are just trying to shame women who aren't going to let being a mom shape their self worth. All scientific and medical journals should refuse to publish articles that originate from socially-conservative groups.
Click to expand...

I'll take the trade off. 1.5 years less is worth it to not have children.
 
I wish I was anti-choice but I chose to be pro-choice. Darn!
 
JayDubya said:
No. That's stupid.
Click to expand...
PROVE IT! Why must your mere opinion control the actions of others, via Law, when you can't prove your opinion is superior to the opinions of pro-choicers? You already have the right to try to convince someone not to abort'; why do you need more than that? If you are defective at convincing others, that's YOUR fault, not the fault of others.
 
AtlantaAdonis said:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/parenthood-linked-longer-life-study-234045380.html

I will bet anyone money some kind of socially-conservative religious group is behind this study. They are just trying to shame women who aren't going to let being a mom shape their self worth. All scientific and medical journals should refuse to publish articles that originate from socially-conservative groups.
Click to expand...

Where did you find the shaming in this piece.

If anything, all I get from your post Is a attitude of censorship.
 
WCH said:
Being a parent is a selfless act.
Click to expand...
IT IS ALSO SELFISH. You are passing YOUR genes, on, after all. Why yours, and not let someone else pass theirs on, instead? Especially when resources are limited (as proved by human overpopulation causing the extinctions of hundreds of other species every year, because there just isn't enough biomass in the world for all of us and them at the same time).

WCH said:
Aborting your child
Click to expand...
IS NOT WHAT ABORTION DOES. A child is **provably** very different from an unborn human, since an unborn human has an attached placenta functioning as a vital organ, and uses it to assault a woman at least 4 different ways, while an ordinary child has/does no such thing. Thus abortion is a self-defense thing that only targets a mere-animal entity that acts worse than a parasite; it does not target any actual "child".

WCH said:
a selfish act.
Click to expand...
ABORTION CAN BE SELFLESS, TOO. See above, about limited resources. Every time you don't selfishly pass your genes on, you allow others to have the resources so they can selfishly pass their genes on, instead.

WCH said:
Keep this in mind.
Click to expand...
YOU DO THAT,
 
Last edited:
FutureIncoming said:
IT IS ALSO SELFISH. You are passing YOUR genes, on, after all. Why yours, and not let someone else pass theirs on, instead? Especially when resources are limited (as proved by human overpopulation causing the extinctions of hundreds of other species every year, because there just isn't enough biomass in the world for all of us and them at the same time).


IS NOT WHAT ABORTION DOES. A child is **provably** very different from an unborn human, since an unborn human has an attached placenta functioning as a vital organ, and uses it to assault a woman at least 4 different ways, while an ordinary child has/does no such thing. Thus abortion is a self-defense thing that only targets a mere-animal entity that acts worse than a parasite; it does not target any actual "child".


ABORTION CAN BE SELFLESS, TOO. See above, about limited resources. Every time you don't selfishly pass your genes on, you allow others to have the resources so they can selfishly pass their genes on, instead.


YOU DO THAT,
Click to expand...

You a parent? [judging from your rabid support for murder out of convenience...I doubt it]
 
Last edited:
FutureIncoming said:
PROVE IT!
Click to expand...

Because no one is anti-choice, pro-abort.

There are those of us who are moral and oppose the legality of abortion, and then there are those who are at best amoral.
 
JayDubya said:
Because no one is anti-choice, pro-abort.

There are those of us who are moral and oppose the legality of abortion, and then there are those who are at best amoral.
Click to expand...

Another "Libertarian Against Choice" weighs in on the issue!:roll:
 
RickJames3000 said:
Another "Libertarian Against Choice" weighs in on the issue!:roll:
Click to expand...

Essentially no one is broadly against "choice."

What I oppose is the aggressive killing of innocent human beings.
 
JayDubya said:
Essentially no one is broadly against "choice."

What I oppose is the aggressive killing of innocent human beings.
Click to expand...



Me too! Thank God that's not happening when abortions are being performed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom