Re: One Argument for why abortion should be legal
Yes I say, along with others in this thread that also say so LMAO,
thats all that is needed.
OPINION. Therefore you are wrong. Nobody has to agree with you, just because you spout an unsupported opinion. And for those that do agree without providing specific data supporting their opinions, those opinions are just as Objectively worthless as yours.
"YOU" believing facts, logic or honesty is meaningless to me,
ARE YOU SAYING YOUR OPINION IS SUPERIOR TO FACTS, LOGIC, OR HONESTY? HAW! HAW!! HAW!!!
you are free to believe what ever you want.
TRUE, AND THE SAME FOR YOU. But if either of us wants others to agree with what we believe, THAT is where genuine facts, logic, and honesty matter. Not mere claims.
Ill be sticking with logic, facts and honesty
SO YOU SAY. But so far you have not provided any actual proven facts, or logic based on such facts (with regard to the Original Post of this Thread), and so any claim of having been honest about the other two things is actually a Stupid Lie.
like others in the thread.
IRRELEVANT, so long as they also have failed to support their claims with actual data.
I stand by my claim and Im very confident in it LMAO
OPINION, AGAIN. And it will remain nothing more than Objectively worthless opinion until you support it with verifiable facts.
YES, I KNOW THAT. But in this case it doesn't matter in the slightest. You are not behaving any better than JayDubya, notorious for making claims unsupported by even the slightest bit of Objectively Verifiable evidence.
the false argument in the OP is pure retardation of the topic,
GENERIC DENUNCIATION. No specifics provided. Why should anyone believe you? IF THERE IS A FLAW, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO DESCRIBE IT IN DETAIL.
it contains no sound, reasonable, or reality based logic
OPINION, still not supported by the slightest hint of Objectively Verifiable data.
nor anything to do with abortion really.
A PROVABLY FALSE STATEMENT. The post presents background information about ecosystems, predators, and prey, that is extremely relevant to its conclusion --which describes abortion as "a legitimate way humans can prey on humans"
**because** abortion is about "persons versus animals, instead of, as in war, persons versus persons."
This stance or mine and others will not change
NOT IMPORTANT FOR ME TO CHANGE YOUR STANCE. What is important is that you shouldn't make claims you can't support with Objectively Valid data!
because theirs nothing in the OP or in the thread that has been posted to give any validity to the op
OPINION, AGAIN (at least with respect to the OP). Try This Logic: Consider each sentence in the OP. Is it true or false? If any single sentence is false, you should be able to offer evidence showing how it is false. If all the statements are true, then how can the conclusion of the post, derived from all-true-statements, be nonsense? THAT is something you ought to be able to explain in detail, too!
WITH RESPECT TO OTHER POSTS IN THIS THREAD, none has bothered to point out any
**specific** flaws in the OP. On what basis should the OP be automatically assumed invalid, if no one has pointed out any specific flaws?
or reason to take it seriously by anybody honest, topically educated and objective.
SEE ABOVE. On what basis should the OP be automatically assumed invalid, if no one has pointed out any specific flaws?
Its complete intellectual dishonest and absurd tripe,
OPINION, AGAIN, and still unsupported by any Objectively Valid data.
its nonsensical babble at best.
OPINION, AGAIN, and still unsupported by any Objectively Valid data.
It ranks up there with 9/11 and birther conspiracy theories.
OPINION, AGAIN, and still unsupported by any Objectively Valid data.
It's funny, but worthless and meaningless to any honest abortion conversation.
OPINION, AGAIN, and still unsupported by any Objectively Valid data.