You're not quoting facts, you're pushing an arbitrary definition based on ideology
SEE MSG #74. Also, there is a particular thing that is part of English Language Heritage, that most abortion opponents don't seem to realize how relevant it is. It involves the word "being", which has multiple definitions. One of them is used very consistently by members of both sides of the Overall Abortion Debate. While not common (nor is it especially rare), phrases such as "intelligent being", "alien being", and "extraterrestrial being" are recognized by every reasonably educated human as referring to nonhuman
persons. Meanwhile, no one ever uses phrases like "turtle being", "swan being", and "lobster being" --they are
not persons. Logically, the phrase "human being" refers to a person that happens to be human (instead of, say, an extraterrestrial).
But that doesn't mean the phrase applies to every human!
You
might call a zygote a "person", but I'm not stupid enough to do that, when some fail to start dividing and thereby become morulas. You
might call a morula a "person", but I'm not stupid enough to do that, when some fail to crack open the zona pellucida and escape to become blastocysts. You
might call a blastocyst a "person", but I'm not stupid enough to do that, when some fail to implant into a womb and become embryos --and
some might implant and become hydatidiform moles, instead. NO ONE calls a hydatidiform mole a "person", yet before that 100% human and alive entity began to exist in that form, it was a zygote that became a morula that became a blastocyst. On what basis can a living person become a living non-person, just by developing further, following its built-in genetic instructions?
The concepts of "human" and "person" are fundamentally different and distinct concepts. Just because something is human, that doesn't mean it is also a person, and just because something is a person, that doesn't mean it is a human. Consistent Language Use requires us to call unborn humans "humans", but to never call them "human beings" (meaning "human persons")
that holds no more validity than the pro-life side. The concept of personhood is purely philosophical in nature.
TELL THAT TO THE SCIENTISTS STUDYING DOLPHINS. It is a concept associated with characteristics that can be
measured! Which means you are totally mistaken.