• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Election 2012 - Voter Fraud or Rigged Machines?

explain this

NEVER BEFORE HAS THERE BEEN MORE VOTES FOR CONGRESSMEN
THAN FOR PRESIDENT IN ANY PREVIOUS ELECTION....EVER!!!!

That's because to many on the right, the GOP candidate for president SUCKED.

Are we supposed to believe that 303,442 people voted for

republican congressmen and not Mitt Romney?

Yes, and why? Because Romney sucked to many on the right. Even staunch conservatives in my family wouldn't vote for Romney and I know they were not alone. over 3 million (if I remember correctly) Republicans STAYED HOME this election. That should tell you something right there.


This is more proof ...stolen election


No, it's proof you and some other righties have some sour grapes in your mouth.

Also, your post smells like a chain email gone bad.
 
explain this
Are we supposed to believe that 303,442 people voted for

republican congressmen and not Mitt Romney?

Yes. I voted for Obama, but didn't vote Democrat for everyone on the ticket. Not all democrats and republicans are alike. Some republicans didn't like Romney.

Your logic is flawed as you are assuming that everyone votes party lines.
 
He also conveniently left out 3rd party votes.
 
I miss the days when partisans on both sides knew how to lose an election.
 
do you even read??? theres lot of things that say obama hoosein or whatever stole the election with is chicago buddies just google search it and youll find lots of stuff. but the obam worshipers dont want to know about it so they just cover theyr eyes and keep worshipping their savior...jeez guys!!!!!

What proof do you have that Obama stole the election?
 
do you even read??? theres lot of things that say obama hoosein or whatever stole the election with is chicago buddies just google search it and youll find lots of stuff. but the obam worshipers dont want to know about it so they just cover theyr eyes and keep worshipping their savior...jeez guys!!!!!

So, you don't have any proof. Got it.
 
do you even read??? theres lot of things that say obama hoosein or whatever stole the election with is chicago buddies just google search it and youll find lots of stuff. but the obam worshipers dont want to know about it so they just cover theyr eyes and keep worshipping their savior...jeez guys!!!!!

Yeah because you believe whatever some rightwing nutjob tells you. In the grown-up world, we recognize that there will be no recount and there was not any stealing of an election. Unless of course you count how the GOP lost the election by picking Romney.
 
what does that mean???

it means that you overplayed the hyperpartisan republican hand. the most successful poes know where the line at which the illusion breaks is at. you sprinted across it from post one.
 
do you even read??? theres lot of things that say obama hoosein or whatever stole the election with is chicago buddies just google search it and youll find lots of stuff. but the obam worshipers dont want to know about it so they just cover theyr eyes and keep worshipping their savior...jeez guys!!!!!

It's President Barack Hussein Obama. At least get your president's name correct.
 
Once the GOP widens it's base in a true accepting, instead of an exclusive way - and quits being held hostage by the Norquist Gang - they'll start to win again.
 
I'm sure there was voter fraud on BOTH sides.

Hell, There was fraud before the voting started, because they made it near impossible to vote third party. I'm personally speaking from experience, as a true conservative I found it difficult to vote for Mitt Romney in this election so I decided to vote for Gary Johnson. There were so many hoops I had to jump through, to simply vote third party. It was disgusting and it really opened my eyes.
 
Democrats in 2000 - Bush stole the election.
Democrats in 2004 - Bush stole the election.

Republicans in 2012 - Obama stole the election.

Republicans - The NEW wuss on the block. :mrgreen:
 
Once the GOP widens it's base in a true accepting, instead of an exclusive way - and quits being held hostage by the Norquist Gang - they'll start to win again.


We don't need to widen our base. We just need effective voter ID laws that curtail the minority vote.
 
We don't need to widen our base. We just need effective voter ID laws that curtail the minority vote.

Frankly, I can't quite tell if you are becoming increasingly more cynical of Republicans and witty or just have OD'd on the Kool-Aid. Your recent posts seem to be quite critical of the Republicans in a clever way; but every now and then you say something that makes me wonder (worry) that you are serious.
 
Last edited:
Frankly, I can't quite tell if you are becoming increasingly more cynical of Republicans and witty or just have OD'd on the Kool-Aid. Your recent posts seem to be quite critical of the Republicans in a clever way; but every now and then you say something that makes me thing you are serious.

His kind of act is very funny on a place like Free Republic (RIP Uncle Slayton) but doesn't translate as well to a board where all views are welcome anyway.
 
I'm just laughing here. What are the real chance of voting fraud? Lets think about this logical for one second. It would be a waste of time for voting fraud to happen in the first place. Lets take me for example, I'm able to vote by mail, They sent me the packet, I filled it out and then mailed it back. Simple and quick and easy. Now, If I didn't request mail in ballot, then I would have to go to a polling place and stand in a line for maybe at best 45 mins and vote. Now if you look at several states like Florida, the polling lines were up to 5 hours deep. The chances of somebody voting twice or voting under different names are slim and waste of time, since they would have to sit in line for each fraudulent name they are using. Plus drive to each counties. If voting fraud is going to happen, it would come from a family household where the father or the mother grabbed their 18 year old ballot and filled it out for them or one member in a family filling out everybody's ballot without their knowledge. If the lines are taking 45 minutes to 5 hours wait before voting, well that is a waste of time and gas. Second thing, why is assume that blacks would be the one committing the fraud? Most blacks haven't really started voting up to the last couple of cycles. Most blacks don't even vote, if they live in a democrat state, they won't bother, if the live in a red state, their access in restricted (like Texas) so the idea of them committing voting fraud is just laughable.
 
Last edited:
Rush Limbaugh analyzed that data thoroughly and predicted a landslide victory by Romney.

Republicans will win in a landslide says Rush and Morris - St. Petersburg Political Buzz | Examiner.com


Was it voter fraud that turned the election the other way?

Voter Fraud Charges Begin in Ohio


Or did Obama rig the voting machines?

Did Obama Rig the Voting Machines?


From Sept 25
Polling works. That's why campaigns use internal polls.

Nate Silver does a fantastic job. If you want an unbiased, mathematical analysis of the polling data, give FiveThirtyEight: Politics Done Right a read.

Though, I will say that this illustrates a sort of wingnut tautology. If 300,000,000 people are split down the middle on any argument, then it's a safe bet to assume that both sides have merit. However, wingnuts are incapable of seeing any merit on the other side, and as such cannot conceive of a world where their view is not the dominant view.

Thus, the logic goes something like this: I'm self evidently right, therefore most people agree with me. If a poll finds that not to be the case, then the poll must be in some ways biased or in some way fails to account for my obvious intellectual superiority. This means that the polling data is "actually" in my favor. Now I can approach election day with confidence, knowing that my side is secretly ahead. So when my candidate loses, it can only be because of fraud... It's OBVIOUS! The polling showed that my side was ahead!!!!

Notice the last paragraph.
 
As far as I am concerned if you are not a tax payer you deserve no vote.

That been said lets not lower ourselves to crying like a bunch of liberals.
 
As far as I am concerned if you are not a tax payer you deserve no vote.

That been said lets not lower ourselves to crying like a bunch of liberals.

Looks like crying like a bunch of conservatives is much much more whiney.
 
Rush Limbaugh analyzed that data thoroughly and predicted a landslide victory by Romney.

Republicans will win in a landslide says Rush and Morris - St. Petersburg Political Buzz | Examiner.com


Was it voter fraud that turned the election the other way?

Voter Fraud Charges Begin in Ohio


Or did Obama rig the voting machines?

Did Obama Rig the Voting Machines?


Limbaugh is a college dropout.

Your other two right wing sources and their speculation about misdeeds just want to divide the country when we need to come together.
 
Rush Limbaugh analyzed that data thoroughly and predicted a landslide victory by Romney.

Republicans will win in a landslide says Rush and Morris - St. Petersburg Political Buzz | Examiner.com


Was it voter fraud that turned the election the other way?

Voter Fraud Charges Begin in Ohio


Or did Obama rig the voting machines?

Did Obama Rig the Voting Machines?

Considering the rampant and sickening voter fraud the repubs got away with, it's quite fitting - and satisfying (for Ron Paul supporters) to hear them cry foul.
 
Back
Top Bottom