• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Newsweek Has A Very Pointed Post-Election Message For The GOP

damn dude, take a pill...it's not an important issue whatsoever... holy ****, you'd think i was attacking your family or something.... calm down, breathe... relax.. enjoy an evening of politicking without losing your mind ..

Yawn, starting to bore me now. Last time I ask you: How is telling Obama to get out and that we need a new president being 'pro-Obama'? Can't answer it, can ya? Another day where Thrilla can't put his money where his mouth is. :)
 
Is there a link to the full article anywhere? At any rate Id say they have a point, old white people are a dying demographic literally.
 
Yawn, starting to bore me now. Last time I ask you: How is telling Obama to get out and that we need a new president being 'pro-Obama'? Can't answer it, can ya? Another day where Thrilla can't put his money where his mouth is. :)

I've explained it... you disagree with me.... there's really nothing more left to do other than sit here and watch you lose you mind over something stupid.


don't get me wrong, watching you flip your lid is rather entertaining... I approve of it.
 
I've explained it... you disagree with me.

Yes, your response was more or less because Obama got a pretty picture and Republicans only get insulted. That's not much of an explanation and I proved it wrong. However, I see you can't come up with anything of substance, so on to another thread I go. Remember, 5 different Newsweek covers proved your assertion wrong. That's gotta sting.
 
Lots of whites died freeing blacks

if blacks had not been warring against each other in africa how the hell could white guys with single shot muskets and one thousandth the number of Africans manage to enslave 5 million people?

Those white guys were obviously superior in every way right? Plucking human beings from the jungle like apples from trees.
Don't they just reek of superiority?
 
Focussing on white voters will not win anymore elections for the Republicans. Excellent article here:

The Republicans used to routinely win Presidential elections. Now the party will have to have a fundamental rethink if it is to win again. The central key to Republican dominance a generation ago was race and demography. The same factors are now the key barrier to the party winning again.

The race for the White House in 2012 offers a striking example of a major western election in which a party has destroyed its own prospects of power by going too tough on immigration, by being perceived to adopt so hard a tone on the issue that it has toxified the party brand, particularly with Hispanic voters, who are the fastest-growing section of the electorate, but also with voters under 35 more generally, particularly graduates.

White voters remain by far the largest group of voters, but they are falling, election on election, as a proportion of the overall electorate.
Mitt Romney did more than enough last night to win the 1988 or 1992 Presidential elections – by taking 6 out of 10 white voters last night
In 1992, 6 out of 10 white voters would have given the Republican candidate a majority of all Americans: because 87 per cent of the electorate in 1992 was white, six out of ten white voters would have made up 52.2 per cent of all of those who voted.

If you could only take Romney back two decades and he had enough white voters to win the election, without the need to win a single non-white, Hispanic or black voter at all. But fast forward a quarter of a century, and the Republicans are still campaigning like it is 1988, in an America that looks and so votes rather differently.

The Republicans must accept that they can't rely on white votes to win
 
Yes, your response was more or less because Obama got a pretty picture and Republicans only get insulted. That's not much of an explanation and I proved it wrong. However, I see you can't come up with anything of substance, so on to another thread I go. Remember, 5 different Newsweek covers proved your assertion wrong. That's gotta sting.

I see.. so when i comment on 2 pictures ( election results covers), you prove my opinion wrong by showing 5 unrelated and irrelevant pictures.

it does sting a lil bit, though... but that's probably caused by the facepalm you made me give you.
(I actually did give you a facepalm.. for taking such a stupid issue so very seriously.)
 
Focussing on white voters will not win anymore elections for the Republicans. Excellent article here:



The Republicans must accept that they can't rely on white votes to win

not entirely true, if white people would line up and vote near 100% for the same candidate that candidate would win every time, if african americans can do it, why cant white americans? there is still a massive majority of whites in america, and a true united front of white support would still have ~70% of the total electorate.
 
I'm sick of people throwing around the term "double standard." You know what would make it a double standard? If white people WERE ACTUALLY AN OPPRESSED MINORITY and being treated differently than blacks.

This is not a double-standard. It's two perfectly legitimate standards given two very different historical experiences.
 
not entirely true, if white people would line up and vote near 100% for the same candidate that candidate would win every time, if african americans can do it, why cant white americans? there is still a massive majority of whites in america, and a true united front of white support would still have ~70% of the total electorate.

That is just too theoritical. Is it practical?
 
That is just too theoritical. Is it practical?

depends, if it's practical for other races, and racism is indeed an invalid theory, then i'd say in theory it could be practical?
 
2 quick questions
... how exactly did the GOP focus on white voters?
..and how does the GOP focus on other races without being racist?

They didn't specifically focus on white voters, they just used strategies that only worked on white voters. That and their stances on immigration, taxes, education do not help especially minorities and immigrants.
 
I will add "you are obstructionist".

obama-as-napoleon-newsweek-final-cover.jpg

Newsweek creates cover stories like this specifically BECAUSE they know it will get people riled up and talking about them. Over the last decade, they've become less like a standard news magazine, and more like a dumbed-down tabloid.

The GOP isn't "history." Romney only lost the election by 2% for Christ's sake. I'll bet the Republican Party survives a lot longer than Newsweek does.
 
I just like how so many people are so casually cheering the demise of whites in america.
 
Those white guys were obviously superior in every way right? Plucking human beings from the jungle like apples from trees.
Don't they just reek of superiority?

your attempt to twist what I said so you can whine about racism is pathetic. The fact is, blacks sold blacks to whites and arabs-logistically, if Africans had been unified in a resistance to the slave trade, the numbers would have been far lower if existent at all
 
And it is this weird notion that history started yesterday that insures that the GOP will continue to alienate minorities and hopefully go extinct.

That's an odd thing to be saying right after an election where the Republicans almost beat your guy.

On this very thread no fewer than three conservatives claimed slavery was no big deal. Indeed didn't you. So your sudden vision of morality seems a bit self-serving now.

So apparently you think conservatives share a hive mind. How odd. The Republican Party started as the abolitionist party and Democrats defended the practice of slavery for a long time. The same Democrats who kept blacks down by violence went straight to being the biggest buddies of the black community, which they subsequently destroyed through their anti-poverty and welfare programs. I don't think it's any coincidence that the people who put on white robes with pointy hats are the ones who later kept blacks poor and dependent on government for everything. The most fortunate blacks are the ones who managed to break away from that system through self reliance and hard work, neither of which Democrats are especially keen to promote.
 
your attempt to twist what I said so you can whine about racism is pathetic. The fact is, blacks sold blacks to whites and arabs-logistically, if Africans had been unified in a resistance to the slave trade, the numbers would have been far lower if existent at all

And again you excuse the unexcusable. The numbers would have been ZERO if it wasn't for the demand from plantation owners.
 
if the alternative if going off the air due to a lack of ad revenue? that's a lot of unemployed people, hard to blame them for grandstanding.
That is what it comes down to. Attention whoring. That is why this is coming from the very same publication put out that “Time To Hit The Road” cover just a few months back (that had Team Red crowing across the internet, I assume on this very board, and I expect by more than a few that are down talking down Newsweek).

Controversy sells, faux or not.
 
Back
Top Bottom