• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Obama Campaign to Supporters: Don’t Panic Over Early Exit Polls [W:47]

Objective-J said:
1.) i didnt say it would be smart to be confident I just say the comment doesnt point to being unconfident, its points to being confident
2.) that was my point they dont take the threats serious, they think they are a joke
3.) nope you were wrong, i honestly wanted to know how he got to where he did and it wasnt about you it was about the OP as I CLEARLY noted and yes to think like that IMO is nutty :shrug: I stand by that
Click to expand...
I like posters like you who use replies that quote my comments to speak to someone else and their comments. So you don't disagree with anything I said and you stand behind the personal snides? Goody for you? Just for my own edification, what is it that I am "wrong" about?
 
Gie said:
I like posters like you who use replies that quote my comments to speak to someone else and their comments. So you don't disagree with anything I said and you stand behind the personal snides? Goody for you? Just for my own edification, what is it that I am "wrong" about?
Click to expand...

like whatever you want lol

you assessment about yourself and me (what i was saying) was still wrong :shrug:
 
Gie said:
This comes across to me as a message intended to make sure that supporters not only Tweet but go ahead and vote if they have not already. Despite any early exit polling and returns that come in from states where polls have closed. Which is pretty par for the course in an election IMO. I'm sure if we searched hard enough we can find something from the Romney side suggesting much the same thing. What it obviously is not is a message from a very confident campaign, but one from a rightly cautious campaign that is aware how tight the race is projected and wanting every vote it can get. Given some of the dire predictions of violence and civil unrest that have been threatened if Obama does not win, you could say it is a good idea to start trying to keep those types calm early on. Good call campaign Obama!
Click to expand...

There have been predictions of violence every single ****ing election and they never come to pass. Jut another way to demonize your opposition based on nothing.
 
Last edited:
Objective-J said:
like whatever you want lol

you assessment about yourself and me (what i was saying) was still wrong :shrug:
Click to expand...
I offered no assessment of myself or you. I made a comment about the personal nature of your comments and you said you stood behind them. You stood behind something that did not exist? OK.

Redress said:
There have been predictions of violence every single ****ing election and they never come to pass. Jut another way to demonize your opposition based on nothing.
Click to expand...
I don't disagree. I doubt very seriously if we will see any at all, even in Chicago!
 
Objective-J said:
agreed you dont have to thats your OP failed :shrug:
Click to expand...

Ok, well, whatever that sentence is supposed to say...

Believe it, or not, this is still American and I can still express an opinion and interpret an article however I please. The Libbos haven't taken away our rights...yet and I don't have to answer to you.
 
Gie said:
I don't disagree. I doubt very seriously if we will see any at all, even in Chicago!
Click to expand...

Then why bring it up?
 
Redress said:
Then why bring it up?
Click to expand...
Is there something preventing you from understanding the comments I made and the context I made them in? I will point out I have already clarified a lot of this. So if you seriously need me to rehash it all or want to argue with me about it or challenge something you see as a claim I made, feel free. I'll be glad to walk you through it.
 
Last edited:
Gie said:
I offered no assessment of myself or you. I made a comment about the personal nature of your comments and you said you stood behind them. You stood behind something that did not exist? OK.


I don't disagree. I doubt very seriously if we will see any at all, even in Chicago!
Click to expand...

yes you did, you thought i was referring to you when i said nutcases i wasnt and you thought my motive was personal, it wasnt

both wrong :shrug:
 
I have been told for many years the democrats bus in busloads of illegal voters to vote, illegally. Tomorrow I want one of you really conservative types to prove it. Catch a bus load of them, turn them in. I will quite making fun of you guys. At least for a day or two, promise.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Cease with the baiting, flaming and trolling or else.
 
apdst said:
1.)Ok, well, whatever that sentence is supposed to say...

2.)Believe it, or not, this is still American and I can still express an opinion and interpret an article however I please.
The Libbos haven't taken away our rights...
3.)yet and I don't have to answer to you.
Click to expand...

1.it said thats why your op failed.
2.) agreed good thing i never stated otherwise LMAO that same freedom of speech always me to expose your post when they are illogical also :D
3.) again another thing i never said, it just further exposes your failed post since you cant back up your false claims :shrug:

you like to jump around a lot dont you? lol
 
Objective-J said:
yes you did, you thought i was referring to you when i said nutcases i wasnt and you thought my motive was personal, it wasnt

both wrong :shrug:
Click to expand...
No you are wrong, I offered no assessment of myself or you. Rather than point out the obvious over and over again, since you don't disagree with anything else I said that you bothered to quote and reply to, hasta.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom