• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Wow this is stunning!!!!!! [W:188]

Navy Pride

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
39,883
Reaction score
3,070
Location
Pacific NW
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
http://www.therightscoop.com/report-clinton-asked-for-more-security-in-benghazi-obama-said-no/



According to Ed Klein yesterday on Wilkow, the legal counsel of Hillary Clinton told him that she had actually ordered more security in Benghazi before the attack, however Obama turned it down.
In fact he also reports that Bill Clinton wants her to release proof of this to protect herself even though it would likely cost Obama the election.



EXAMINER- Last night, it was revealed that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had ordered more security at the U.S. mission in Benghazi before it was attacked where four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens were murdered by Al-Qaeda but President Obama denied the request.

The news broke on TheBlazeTV’s “Wilkow!” hosted by Andrew Wilkow, by best-selling author, Ed Klein who said the legal counsel to Clinton had informed him of this information.

Klein also said that those same sources said that former President Bill Clinton has been “urging” his wife [Hillary] to release official State Department documents that prove she called for additional security at the compound in Libya, which would almost certainly result in President Obama losing the election.

Klein explained that everyone knew what was happening in Benghazi from the CIA to the National Security Agency and that there’s intelligence cables that have not been released.

Wilkow asked, “If everybody knew this including the White House, who would have given the order to go in and save the ambassador?”

Klein, “The President…he should have given the order to use the rapid reaction force…”

Wilkow, “Not Petraeus?”

Klein, “Well it has to come from the president.”

Not only does this reflect very poorly on the Obama administration, but also on the propaganda media that has been trying to protect him every since this happened on the night of 9/11.

This is likely one of the biggest scandals this country has ever seen and it’s been hidden by the Obama administration and the media.

And we hanged Richard Nixon to dry, because of "little old" Watergate???? Dear Lord!!!!! What's happening here????





 
It IS stunning! I've lost track though. Is this the 26th or 27th Benghazi thread in the Election 2012 forum?
 
It IS stunning! I've lost track though. Is this the 26th or 27th Benghazi thread in the Election 2012 forum?

No matter how much the media covers it up it won't go away my left wing friend..........
 
It IS stunning! I've lost track though. Is this the 26th or 27th Benghazi thread in the Election 2012 forum?

You'd prefer the four dead Americans didn't become an election issue?
 
Navy pride is getting more and more desperate. When is he going to start the birther or Rev Wright threads....LOL
 
You'd prefer the four dead Americans didn't become an election issue?

You tell 'em.

We need to stop Obama before he's responsible for 4000 dead Americans.
 
You'd prefer the four dead Americans didn't become an election issue?

I would prefer that partisan hacks didn't cheapen their deaths by trying to turn them into a vile political stunt.
 
I would prefer that partisan hacks didn't cheapen their deaths by trying to turn them into a vile political stunt.

A political stunt?

All the Obama Administration had to do was explain what happened two months ago and this would all be history.

Instead he chose to lie, thinking the main stream media would cover his ass. But because he began laying the blame elsewhere the leaks began and, quite naturally, it was to Fox News, the only network which would dare defy the Obama White House.
 
The Leftists are certainly trying to highjack this thread.

related issues should be discussed together. when someone brings up the war in iraq being illegal, the right is always quick to bring up libya, so i don't see the distinction when the shoe is on the other foot.
 
related issues should be discussed together. when someone brings up the war in iraq being illegal, the right is always quick to bring up libya, so i don't see the distinction when the shoe is on the other foot.

Well at least you admit it.
 
Well at least you admit it.

i think it's just a basic part about discussing something, i mean how else are we to compare/contrast different situations if we only refer to the singular incident at hand? would make it very difficult to have an open conversation regarding the issues.
 
http://www.therightscoop.com/report-clinton-asked-for-more-security-in-benghazi-obama-said-no/



According to Ed Klein yesterday on Wilkow, the legal counsel of Hillary Clinton told him that she had actually ordered more security in Benghazi before the attack, however Obama turned it down.
In fact he also reports that Bill Clinton wants her to release proof of this to protect herself even though it would likely cost Obama the election.

EXAMINER- Last night, it was revealed that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had ordered more security at the U.S. mission in Benghazi before it was attacked where four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens were murdered by Al-Qaeda but President Obama denied the request.

The news broke on TheBlazeTV’s “Wilkow!” hosted by Andrew Wilkow, by best-selling author, Ed Klein who said the legal counsel to Clinton had informed him of this information.

Klein also said that those same sources said that former President Bill Clinton has been “urging” his wife [Hillary] to release official State Department documents that prove she called for additional security at the compound in Libya, which would almost certainly result in President Obama losing the election.

Klein explained that everyone knew what was happening in Benghazi from the CIA to the National Security Agency and that there’s intelligence cables that have not been released.

Wilkow asked, “If everybody knew this including the White House, who would have given the order to go in and save the ambassador?”

Klein, “The President…he should have given the order to use the rapid reaction force…”

Wilkow, “Not Petraeus?”

Klein, “Well it has to come from the president.”

Not only does this reflect very poorly on the Obama administration, but also on the propaganda media that has been trying to protect him every since this happened on the night of 9/11.

This is likely one of the biggest scandals this country has ever seen and it’s been hidden by the Obama administration and the media.

And we hanged Richard Nixon to dry, because of "little old" Watergate???? Dear Lord!!!!! What's happening here????




Link failure NP. Old reporting NP. All the facts are not in yet on this yet NP.
 
I would prefer that partisan hacks didn't cheapen their deaths by trying to turn them into a vile political stunt.

The good news, Adam, is that the election is fewer than two days away. Those whose interest has been craven, who have seized an opportunity to foment a "vile political stunt," will have no interest.

That will leave only those of us who earnestly and deeply care about the facts of Benghazi. On Wednesday morning, regardless of who wins, we will still have the same questions.
 
related issues should be discussed together. when someone brings up the war in iraq being illegal, the right is always quick to bring up libya, so i don't see the distinction when the shoe is on the other foot.

The war in Iraq has nothing to do with Benghazi. Perhaps we will learn that there are similarities to "Iran-gate" (I am referring to guns-brokering here), but comparing a war (authorized by Congress) to the assassination of a United States ambassador on home soil and the apparent security failures isn't going to work.
 
No matter how much the media covers it up it won't go away my left wing friend..........
There won't be much talk about it after election day my right wing friend.
 
You tell 'em.

We need to stop Obama before he's responsible for 4000 dead Americans.

Like bush!? Oh wait... That did happen :shock: And he won another election :shock:
 
The war in Iraq has nothing to do with Benghazi. Perhaps we will learn that there are similarities to "Iran-gate" (I am referring to guns-brokering here), but comparing a war (authorized by Congress) to the assassination of a United States ambassador on home soil and the apparent security failures isn't going to work.

perhaps we will.
 
There won't be much talk about it after election day my right wing friend.

I wouldn't bet on that. I am going to be every bit as interested after election day as I am now. And I don't think I'm alone.
 
The Leftists are certainly trying to highjack this thread.

Well....when you talk about 4 dead....vs....the hundreds/thousands of dead as a result of GWB.....it puts it all into perspective.
 
Cool chain email Navy...
 
I wouldn't bet on that. I am going to be every bit as interested after election day as I am now. And I don't think I'm alone.

indeed, i remain very interested in this. Anyone responsible for willful negligence should be held responsible: If it's Obama, or Bush, or the messiah (not obama, the other one) and regardless of political stripe that fact does not change.
 
Well....when you talk about 4 dead....vs....the hundreds/thousands of dead as a result of GWB.....it puts it all into perspective.

Only if you regard others as numbers rather than as unique individuals who are all "Number 1."
 
Back
Top Bottom