• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Wow this is stunning!!!!!! [W:188]

http://www.therightscoop.com/report-clinton-asked-for-more-security-in-benghazi-obama-said-no/



According to Ed Klein yesterday on Wilkow, the legal counsel of Hillary Clinton told him that she had actually ordered more security in Benghazi before the attack, however Obama turned it down.
In fact he also reports that Bill Clinton wants her to release proof of this to protect herself even though it would likely cost Obama the election.



EXAMINER- Last night, it was revealed that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had ordered more security at the U.S. mission in Benghazi before it was attacked where four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens were murdered by Al-Qaeda but President Obama denied the request.

The news broke on TheBlazeTV’s “Wilkow!” hosted by Andrew Wilkow, by best-selling author, Ed Klein who said the legal counsel to Clinton had informed him of this information.

Klein also said that those same sources said that former President Bill Clinton has been “urging” his wife [Hillary] to release official State Department documents that prove she called for additional security at the compound in Libya, which would almost certainly result in President Obama losing the election.

Klein explained that everyone knew what was happening in Benghazi from the CIA to the National Security Agency and that there’s intelligence cables that have not been released.

Wilkow asked, “If everybody knew this including the White House, who would have given the order to go in and save the ambassador?”

Klein, “The President…he should have given the order to use the rapid reaction force…”

Wilkow, “Not Petraeus?”

Klein, “Well it has to come from the president.”

Not only does this reflect very poorly on the Obama administration, but also on the propaganda media that has been trying to protect him every since this happened on the night of 9/11.

This is likely one of the biggest scandals this country has ever seen and it’s been hidden by the Obama administration and the media.

And we hanged Richard Nixon to dry, because of "little old" Watergate???? Dear Lord!!!!! What's happening here????






Or, it's not true. This is a made up scandal.
 
I would prefer that partisan hacks didn't cheapen their deaths by trying to turn them into a vile political stunt.

You cheapen them by tring to cover it up.
 
Or, it's not true. This is a made up scandal.

I'm confused--what's the made-up scandal? What happened in Benghazi or Navy Pride's OP?
 
I'm confused--what's the made-up scandal? What happened in Benghazi or Navy Pride's OP?

The spin the right is putting on the Benghazi story is their attempt to created a scandal where there is none.
 
The spin the right is putting on the Benghazi story is their attempt to create a scandal where there is none.

spin or no spin, this needs to be fully investigated, we don't know the whole truth yet one way or the other.
 
Only if you regard others as numbers rather than as unique individuals who are all "Number 1."

I don't regard anyone as a number....but when you see the wackos out here.....crying outrage.....and all the while they remained completely quiet about the thousands who died on 911 and elsewhere
under GWB....it kinda rings hollow...don't ya think?
 
The spin the right is putting on the Benghazi story is their attempt to created a scandal where there is none.

What spin is this?
 
What spin is this?

http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-...-obi-ordered-no-response-benghazi-attack.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-us-presidential-election/140712-benghazi-revisited.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-...die-and-denied-their-request-help-w-84-a.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-...ies-and-2012-presidential-election-cycle.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-...ether-americans-benghazi-were-denied-req.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-us-presidential-election/140408-he-knew.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-...n/140678-petraeus-throws-obama-under-bus.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-...38-conservatives-hypocrites-lybia-attack.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-...uest-help-during-benghazi-attack-sources.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-...ion/140588-new-indication-not-just-video.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-...ty-benghazi-obama-said-no-read-more-http.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-...slain-seal-made-decision-not-save-my-son.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-us-presidential-election/140611-so-obama-benghazi-true.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-...hazi-did-your-son-always-have-balls-size.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-us-presidential-election/140398-ansar-al-sharia.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-us-presidential-election/140320-latest-benghazi-intel.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-...efings-obama-week-before-embassy-attacks.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-...benghazi-blame-video-3-days-after-attack.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-...n/140077-benghazi-attack-attack-crumbles.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-us-presidential-election/140211-war-words-over-libya.html
 
NP, you cheapen them by trying to use their deaths for political gain.

Navy Pride will spit on the graves of soldiers...if he thinks it will get his political gain....that's his MO
 
I wouldn't bet on that. I am going to be every bit as interested after election day as I am now. And I don't think I'm alone.
I think all of the Ed Klein fans are in the same boat.
 
I don't regard anyone as a number....but when you see the wackos out here.....crying outrage.....and all the while they remained completely quiet about the thousands who died on 911 and elsewhere
under GWB....it kinda rings hollow...don't ya think?

No. That's because those of us who aren't whackos understand the difference between a war sanctioned by Congress and the assassination of an ambassador on home soil in a country with which we are not at war. We also understand the difference in scope between 9-11-2001 and 9-11-2012.
 
No. That's because those of us who aren't whackos understand the difference between a war sanctioned by Congress and the assassination of an ambassador on home soil in a country with which we are not at war. We also understand the difference in scope between 9-11-2001 and 9-11-2012.

after the bolded part you should have added 'under the pretense of false information knowingly supplied by the Bush administration'.
 
No. That's because those of us who aren't whackos understand the difference between a war sanctioned by Congress and the assassination of an ambassador on home soil in a country with which we are not at war. We also understand the difference in scope between 9-11-2001 and 9-11-2012.
no.....you understand how to manipulate deaths in order to attempt to make a political agenda......a rather poorly I might add.
 
No. That's because those of us who aren't whackos understand the difference between a war sanctioned by Congress and the assassination of an ambassador on home soil in a country with which we are not at war. We also understand the difference in scope between 9-11-2001 and 9-11-2012.

a) 9/11 killed 3000 americans. there was no war at the time. b) it was a rented house with no diplomatic recognition as a consulate which was in reality a cover for the cia station. good that you understand that the scope of 9.11 2001 was orders of magnitude greateer than 2012.
 
I think all of the Ed Klein fans are in the same boat.

This Ed Klein? Ed Klein: Bill Clinton ‘Urging’ Hillary to Release Benghazi Documents That Would ‘Exonerate’ Her | Video | TheBlaze.com

And just so we're clear here, are you lumping me in with "Ed Klein fans"? Asking because I had to Google to remember who he is, LOL.

More to the real point, are you insinuating that anyone who is questioning Benghazi is an "Ed Klein fan" and that his/her opinions are therefore unworthy of consideration?

Is this what you're implying?

If so, then you are leaving no room for earnest American citizens who are Dems, Republicans, Libertarians, and apoliticals who are nevertheless extremely concerned about what happened and who want definitive answers. Who don't understand why after seven weeks there are none. Who despair at the prospect of what appears to be an inevitable Congressional investigation and another cynical reminder of the dissembling and half-truth games that politicians play.
 
No. That's because those of us who aren't whackos understand the difference between a war sanctioned by Congress and the assassination of an ambassador on home soil in a country with which we are not at war. We also understand the difference in scope between 9-11-2001 and 9-11-2012.

Good then you realize that this event can never even come close to Bush's blunder of leaving us defenseless despite repeated warnings of an attack with airplanes. I have never heard of a President that is in charge of defenses in an foreign Embassy. The CIA was right next door.
 
a) 9/11 killed 3000 americans. there was no war at the time. b) it was a rented house with no diplomatic recognition as a consulate which was in reality a cover for the cia station. good that you understand that the scope of 9.11 2001 was orders of magnitude greateer than 2012.

Yes, I obviously do understand the difference in scope. What I also understand, however, is that sheer numbers don't matter here. Those four human beings who died in Benghazi are every bit as important as the 3000 who died on 9-11-2001.

Now, do YOU understand the difference between thousands of people who randomly and innocently died and an ambassador, an employee of the State Department serving in an official capacity, who was targeted specifically for assassination?
 
Yes, I obviously do understand the difference in scope. What I also understand, however, is that sheer numbers don't matter here. Those four human beings who died in Benghazi are every bit as important as the 3000 who died on 9-11-2001.

Now, do YOU understand the difference between thousands of people who randomly and innocently died and an ambassador, an employee of the State Department serving in an official capacity, who was targeted specifically for assassination?

Wait ... are you suggesting that 911 was just some kind of airplane accident? Two jets just coincidentally slammed into the twin towers? They weren't specifically targeted?
 
I would prefer that partisan hacks didn't cheapen their deaths by trying to turn them into a vile political stunt.
Oh, that NEVER happens...:roll:

theo2.jpg
 
Wait ... are you suggesting that 911 was just some kind of airplane accident? Two jets just coincidentally slammed into the twin towers? They weren't specifically targeted?

quite the coincidence, apparently lots of shoddy pilots were in the air that day.
 
The biggest difference is that thousands died in 911 and the left came together with the country to oppose those who would attack us. 4 Died in Benghazi....and the right wing jumps on the chance to attempt to score a cheap political victory.
 
The biggest difference is that thousands died in 911 and the left came together with the country to oppose those who would attack us. 4 Died in Benghazi....and the right wing jumps on the chance to attempt to score a cheap political victory.

Bush didn't come out the next day and claim his 9/11 attack was about an internet video. He immediately blamed terrorists. There was no attempt at a cover-up.
 
Yes, I obviously do understand the difference in scope. What I also understand, however, is that sheer numbers don't matter here. Those four human beings who died in Benghazi are every bit as important as the 3000 who died on 9-11-2001.

Now, do YOU understand the difference between thousands of people who randomly and innocently died and an ambassador, an employee of the State Department serving in an official capacity, who was targeted specifically for assassination?

Yes an ambassador engaged in weapons smuggling in collusion with the CIA. Yep I understand that with crystal clarity.
 
Back
Top Bottom