• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

And so it begins....

Redress said:
If they where campaigning you would have a complaint. So far there is zero evidence they where. This is outrage over nothing so far. I really do not understand the need conservatives have of being the victim.
Click to expand...

When a group of people shows up at a polling place and identifies themselves as the NAACP, do you really think they are an unbiased group simply wanting to hand out water? Come on. It was probably more like this "Good morning brothers and sisters, have a bottle of water and be sure to vote for our brother obama. Remember he cares about us and Romney doesn't"
 
Redress said:
If they where campaigning you would have a complaint. So far there is zero evidence they where. This is outrage over nothing so far. I really do not understand the need conservatives have of being the victim.
Click to expand...

Your state will give its votes to Romney today. Thanks for playing
 
zimmer said:
Remember this?
zimmer-albums-conservitoons-picture67112828-black-panther-voter-intimidation.jpg



The Tea Party was not armed with batons intimidating people. That is the purview of The New Black Panthers. When Tea Partiers do this, then you can make that claim, until then TNBP's have proven they are willing and able to intimidate voters; they are a militant group.
Click to expand...

Teapartiers are armed with guns, and mumble about watering trees with blood in badly-spelled placards.
 
poweRob said:
If they are nonpartisan organization and handing out water... no problem. Espousing politics while doing so... yeah... that's a problem.
Click to expand...

Especially if they hand out poison water to one side or the other. :lol:
 
Manc Skipper said:
Teapartiers are armed with guns, and mumble about watering trees with blood in badly-spelled placards.
Click to expand...

Bull ****! Those were the lib plants from DemoUnderground doing that so that willing dupes could parrot it later. ;)
 
Manc Skipper said:
Teapartiers are armed with guns, and mumble about watering trees with blood in badly-spelled placards.
Click to expand...

At the polling station?

Link please.
 
poweRob said:
It does not matter their lean. They are not a partisan political organization just like churches aren't.
Click to expand...


So when they enter a polling place and advocate for Obama to people in line to vote, yeah, that sure is non partisan.... Libs have a funny standard when it comes to calling out their own.
 
j-mac said:
So when they enter a polling place and advocate for Obama to people in line to vote, yeah, that sure is non partisan.... Libs have a funny standard when it comes to calling out their own.
Click to expand...

Is that all it would take for you to vote for Obama? Consider yourself advocated. :coffeepap
 
Boo Radley said:
Is that all it would take for you to vote for Obama? Consider yourself advocated. :coffeepap
Click to expand...


I am not sure I said that, but don't let that stop you Joe, it never has before. :coffeepap:
 
j-mac said:
I am not sure I said that, but don't let that stop you Joe, it never has before. :coffeepap:
Click to expand...

I admit it did tickle me. But as to your charge, any evidence of advocating? Small things scare you a lot, but yet often advocate for huge things that really do suppress voting. I find this inconsistent, and a bit whiny.


PA Republican Admits "Voter ID" is Political Power Play

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98hw3lVIC0Q
 
Last edited:
Boo Radley said:
I admit it did tickle me. But as to your charge, any evidence of advocating? Small things scare you a lot, but yet often advocate for huge things that really do suppress voting. I find this inconsistent, and a bit whiny.
Click to expand...


It was within the OP that I posted, as well as reposted by American a page back, and highlighted, so I won't repost it again. May I suggest that you go back and read those two postings, and ask yourself, if it were say a group of southern baptists, or Mormons from Utah in the polling place speaking with people in line about campaigning for Romney, would you be so blah about it, or would you just ignore it in favor of finding something to downplay that you know is wrongdoing on your own side of the isle?

Meanwhile, what are your thoughts of the possibility of IA going for Romney?
 
j-mac said:
It was within the OP that I posted, as well as reposted by American a page back, and highlighted, so I won't repost it again. May I suggest that you go back and read those two postings, and ask yourself, if it were say a group of southern baptists, or Mormons from Utah in the polling place speaking with people in line about campaigning for Romney, would you be so blah about it, or would you just ignore it in favor of finding something to downplay that you know is wrongdoing on your own side of the isle?

Meanwhile, what are your thoughts of the possibility of IA going for Romney?
Click to expand...

Speaking? You're being very vague. Do you think they intimidate?
 
j-mac said:
With a sympathetic DOJ, and people who don't know the law, it won't be Black Panthers with billy clubs this time. It'll be NAACP with bottled water.



Why can't people just let people vote?
Click to expand...

As for this, a very questionable source to start with, we have a lot of according to and serious lack of evidence. Some one may well be badly misrepresenting what happened. Could be more of that whining I speak of, getting the excuses in early.
 
Boo Radley said:
As for this, a very questionable source to start with, we have a lot of according to and serious lack of evidence. Some one may well be badly misrepresenting what happened. Could be more of that whining I speak of, getting the excuses in early.
Click to expand...

As I suspected you would downplay electioneering within the polling place, and avoid the question I asked you

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
 
j-mac said:
As I suspected you would downplay electioneering within the polling place, and avoid the question I asked you

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...

Your question was silly j. No one is stopping anyone from voting.
 
Boo Radley said:
Your question was silly j. No one is stopping anyone from voting.
Click to expand...


If it was so silly, then it should have taken you less than a second to answer, but the fact that you completely avoided the question, and chose to give your patented "it's silly" bull crap just proves that you are not an honest broker.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom