- Joined
- Mar 18, 2011
- Messages
- 13,663
- Reaction score
- 4,633
- Location
- Fla
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
He was breathing.
3 more days until the madness ends
But the fraud case at Damon Corp. doesn’t point straight to Romney. His firm bought the company that was later found guilty of fraud, but Romney was not running the show while crimes were being committed.
The statement is accurate but needs additional information. That fits our definition of Mostly True.
Exactly.He was breathing.
lol You beat me to it!I guess that tells you how loose PolitiFact's "definition" of "mostly true" is:
Claim: ‘Romney was director of a company that stole millions from Medicare’
I think the "power" of the claim rests strongly on the implication that he somehow was.
"Half true" at best. "Mostly true" would merely quibble on a detail, by most people's reckoning.
TRUE!!!!!!!!!!!! what a phony skank he is
http://www.politifact.com/
Do you even read the links you post?
The politicfacts article, along with the part excerpted and posted by Harshaw, seem to call the allegation into question. So who do you believe, the Globe, the Romney campaign, or the courts who never implicated?
Romney was never implicated in the case. He claimed that he helped uncover the fraud, but Globe reporting put that claim into question. The Globe reported that court records showed fraudulent activity occurred under Bain’s watch, and that prosecutors gave the credit to Corning for stopping the fraud.
The Romney campaign, though, pointed us to Globe stories noting that Bain officials began investigating the billing practices when a competitor lab pleaded guilty to the same type of fraud. The campaign also emphasized that Bain was never a majority owner in Damon -- its ownership share peaked at 8 percent and was just 2.8 percent went the company sold to Corning.
First, politifact rated it as "mostly true".
Second, they noted he was one of multiple directors as opposed to being THE "director" solo.
Third, they noted that he was one of many on a board of Directors...not the CEO or someone running the day to day business of the company. This is unlike the person the ad wrongfully attempts to compare him to as equivalents.
Fourth, the story notes that Romney personally was never implicated in the case, that Bain Capital was a minority owner, and that there's some evidence that suggests Romney and/or Bain had helped take steps to expose the wrong the fraud.
So your posting of a link and screaming TRUE would get an interesting rating in and of itself with Politifact...ironically enough.
In reality, Romney was one of multiple people on a board of directors for a company whose employees a ways underneath him were undertaking illegal activity that did not become fully uncovered until after Bain had sold the company when Romney would've had no power to push for action against those who did the wrong doing.
SCANDAL!