• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

We need a President Who Understands business

Of course we need a President who understands business. We need more Congressional reps who do as well.
 
head of joaquin said:
Deregulation of businesses caused a massive financial meltdown and unemployment. The conservative solution: more deregulation.

There's a word for that: psychosis.
Click to expand...

You forgot GREED. That should be their motto.
 
Obama does not want to create a new department get it right. it wants to get rid of duplication within the government in various agencies and put them in an existing agency where the various economic issues can be handled all in one place. Decreasing the size of government. Or is that a bad thing too.
 
wolfman24 said:
Obama does not want to create a new department get it right. it wants to get rid of duplication within the government in various agencies and put them in an existing agency where the various economic issues can be handled all in one place. Decreasing the size of government. Or is that a bad thing too.
Click to expand...

Who is the current Commerce Secretary then? Hard to duplicate an empty chair....well, then again.....
 
wolfman24 said:
Obama does not want to create a new department get it right. it wants to get rid of duplication within the government in various agencies and put them in an existing agency where the various economic issues can be handled all in one place. Decreasing the size of government. Or is that a bad thing too.
Click to expand...

BTW, in this case it would be a bad idea. There is no such thing as "business"--it is competing businesses within a single market. What is good for Banks, GM, Main Street, Wall Street, Big Farms, Small farms, etc cannot be decanted into a single policy. You need experts for each area IMHO, and 1 person is not going to be able to do that.
 
Fisher said:
BTW, in this case it would be a bad idea. There is no such thing as "business"--it is competing businesses within a single market. What is good for Banks, GM, Main Street, Wall Street, Big Farms, Small farms, etc cannot be decanted into a single policy. You need experts for each area IMHO, and 1 person is not going to be able to do that.
Click to expand...

OK wheree did I say one guy?? DUH So you are against consolidation of redundant government agencise in order to reduce the size of government. Uh Huh
 
wolfman24 said:
OK wheree did I say one guy?? DUH So you are against consolidation of redundant government agencise in order to reduce the size of government. Uh Huh
Click to expand...

When it comes to business, yes. There are redundancies throughout the government in part because we do not want everything to be in the Executive department for good reason--Eric Holder's safe can't hold but so much privileged materials.
 
President Romney needs to do to America what he did at Bain Capital.
 
Fisher said:
When it comes to business, yes. There are redundancies throughout the government in part because we do not want everything to be in the Executive department for good reason--Eric Holder's safe can't hold but so much privileged materials.
Click to expand...

I will remember that the next time you bitch about the government
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom