• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Bad news for Team Romney

poweRob said:
Fair enough... I'll show you where you said it... yet AGAIN:


Unless you want to try and do some word shuffling to differentiate how you prefer someone and at the same time want someone else?
Click to expand...


So the people who voted for Hillary Clinton in the primary didn't want Obama to win when they voted for him in the general election in 2008?
 
tres borrachos said:
So the people who voted for Hillary Clinton in the primary didn't want Obama to win when they voted for him in the general election in 2008?
Click to expand...

Red herring much?

You PREFERRED Jon Huntsman in the primary and then discarded the preferred Gary Johnson in the general because he "doesn't have a chance". Neither of them happen to be Romney who you are voting for. Dance all you want. This is what you said.

tres borrachos said:
I considered voting for Johnson at one point. I'm not going to now, because unfortunately he has no chance. I understand your vote however. I voted for Perot in 1992.

My preference at this point would actually have been Huntsman, even though I voted for Romney in my primary.
Click to expand...
 
poweRob said:
Red herring much?

You PREFERRED Jon Huntsman in the primary and then discarded the preferred Gary Johnson in the general because he "doesn't have a chance". Neither of them happen to be Romney who you are voting for. Dance all you want. This is what you said.
Click to expand...

So again, where did I say I don't want Romney to win? I'm still waiting for that post.
 
tres borrachos said:
So again, where did I say I don't want Romney to win? I'm still waiting for that post.
Click to expand...

Right here... AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN.

tres borrachos said:
I considered voting for Johnson at one point. I'm not going to now, because unfortunately he has no chance. I understand your vote however. I voted for Perot in 1992.

My preference at this point would actually have been Huntsman, even though I voted for Romney in my primary.
Click to expand...

What a slippery dodger who just slid into her full circular argument of denial. Tends to happen to people who sell out their convictions so easily that they actually say it out loud then won't face their own comments. You're not "waiting", your spinning.
 
poweRob said:
Right here... AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN.



What a slippery dodger who just slid into her full circular argument of denial. Tends to happen to people who sell out their convictions so easily that they actually say it out loud then won't face their own comments.
Click to expand...

You have yet to back up your claim that I said I didn't want Romney to win. Your words. Stop trying to get out of it now. Just admit I never said any such thing. Everyone who is reading this sees that you can't back it up.
 
I don't want Romney to win, I just want Obama to lose. I'd take that whack job Goode or "The Rent Is Too Damn High" guy over Obama.
 
tres borrachos said:
Nope. Just stating a mathematical fact, unless you have something that proves that the increasing populations are in fact not supporting Obama?
Click to expand...

Would you like to explain what is wrong with a president having support from "increasing populations" (aka code for we-all-know-what)?
 
Panopticon said:
Would you like to explain what is wrong with a president having support from "increasing populations" (aka code for we-all-know-what)?
Click to expand...

It would be kinda cool if you got extra votes for kids.
 
tres borrachos said:
You have yet to back up your claim that I said I didn't want Romney to win. Your words. Stop trying to get out of it now. Just admit I never said any such thing. Everyone who is reading this sees that you can't back it up.
Click to expand...

meh... I posted it several times. I'll let you just continue with your delusion and did you know? No matter how wrong you are, if you post last you WIN!
 
Panopticon said:
Would you like to explain what is wrong with a president having support from "increasing populations" (aka code for we-all-know-what)?
Click to expand...

Who said it was wrong? Not me. I was stating mathematical facts.

What's with you guys making up lies all day today about posts that were never made?
 
Fisher said:
I don't want Romney to win, I just want Obama to lose. I'd take that whack job Goode or "The Rent Is Too Damn High" guy over Obama.
Click to expand...

Now that's honesty. And that's where tes stands too but won't admit it... AFTER having admitted it then denied having done so of course. :lol:
 
poweRob said:
meh... I posted it several times. I'll let you just continue with your delusion and did you know? No matter how wrong you are, if you post last you WIN!
Click to expand...

No, you didn't post it at all. Don't kid yourself. Everyone reading this can see it too. You are trying to say my liking Huntsman or Johnson means I don't want Romney to win. Either you're clueless, or you're a pathalogical liar. Which is it?

I want Romney to win, and never said anything otherwise, even though you lied and said I did.
 
poweRob said:
Now that's honesty. And that's where tes stands too but won't admit it... AFTER having admitted it then denied having done so of course. :lol:
Click to expand...

This is why people like you make me glad I'm not a Liberal. I detest liars - and you are a liar, like most Liberals. But you already knew that.

By the way, now you're changing again. You're saying I want Romney to win because I want Obama to lose. Are you hitting the sauce before you post here, or are you just lying because you're stumped?
 
tres borrachos said:
No, you didn't post it at all. Don't kid yourself. Everyone reading this can see it too. You are trying to say my liking Huntsman or Johnson means I don't want Romney to win. Either you're clueless, or you're a pathalogical liar. Which is it?

I want Romney to win, and never said anything otherwise, even though you lied and said I did.
Click to expand...

At this point, would you preferred to have had Huntsman or Romney?
 
poweRob said:
At this point, would you preferred to have had Huntsman or Romney?
Click to expand...

Huntsman was the superior candidate. Just giving my 2 cents.
 
Rainman05 said:
Huntsman was the superior candidate. Just giving my 2 cents.
Click to expand...

Well that's tres borrachos' choice too.

tres borrachos said:
My preference at this point would actually have been Huntsman, even though I voted for Romney in my primary.
Click to expand...

BUT at the same time she that wants Romney but preferred Huntsman. I guess maybe she wants to rewrite the constitution so that there are two presidents simultaneously?
 
tres borrachos said:
I'll answer when you admit I never said I didn't want Romney to win.
Click to expand...

Do you see some kind of difference between the words "prefer" and "want"?

Who did you prefer to win the primary?
 
poweRob said:
Well that's tres borrachos' choice too.



BUT at the same time she that wants Romney but preferred Huntsman. I guess maybe she wants to rewrite the constitution so that there are two presidents simultaneously?
Click to expand...

I'm guessing she couldn't have the chocolate cake with cream topping and now she settles for a mars bar.

As do most repubs I imagine.
 
poweRob said:
Do you see some kind of difference between the words "prefer" and "want"?

Who did you prefer to win the primary?
Click to expand...

The man I voted for.

If I wanted Huntsman to win, I would have voted for him, wouldn't I?

If you want Obama to win, do you plan to vote for Romney?

Please tell me you aren't this clueless.
 
poweRob said:
Well that's tres borrachos' choice too.



BUT at the same time she that wants Romney but preferred Huntsman. I guess maybe she wants to rewrite the constitution so that there are two presidents simultaneously?
Click to expand...

So, everyone who voted for Clinton in 2008 really wanted to change the Constitution to have 2 Presidents?

You're digging a deeper ditch with every post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom