• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The cost of ObamaCare

If it did now, it wasn't due to reform. There is no logical reason for that. So, while I doubt it went up $300/month, if it did, you may want to consider if they merely saw a sucker. :coffeepap

I have my wife's insurance( she works for a non-profit hospital here in Ohio). The insurance plan had been running us $80/mo until this year, when its going to be $140/mo. I can't really complain since its cheap to begin with, but that's a 75% increase.

Additionally, the hospital was bleeding money due to Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement rates. With the expansion of those programs in the ACA, they are very worried about their future sustainability.
 
I have my wife's insurance( she works for a non-profit hospital here in Ohio). The insurance plan had been running us $80/mo until this year, when its going to be $140/mo. I can't really complain since its cheap to begin with, but that's a 75% increase.

Additionally, the hospital was bleeding money due to Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement rates. With the expansion of those programs in the ACA, they are very worried about their future sustainability.


Four years ago, mine went from $85 a month to $235 a month. Who do I blame?

There is no logical reason for it to go up. We can compare polices all we want, but the fact remains, there is nothing in reform that should make it go up.
 
If it did now, it wasn't due to reform. There is no logical reason for that. So, while I doubt it went up $300/month, if it did, you may want to consider if they merely saw a sucker. :coffeepap

I've already, multiple times, shown it will. Purely due to PPACA and absolutely no other reason.

My insurance is ~$600/mo. Oregon's exchange will cost over $900. For a larger deductible and larger out of pocket max.

Indeed they saw a sucker. The 'they' is Obama.

You're an Obama guy. No manner of proof will do. I almost hope he gets elected so the exchanges do get implemented so the people see exactly what will happen.

$300/mo is going to destroy the middle class.
 
Last edited:
I've already, multiple times, shown it will. Purely due to PPACA and absolutely no other reason.

My insurance is ~$600/mo. Oregon's exchange will cost over $900. For a larger deductible and larger out of pocket max.

Indeed they saw a sucker. The 'they' is Obama.

You're an Obama guy. No manner of proof will do. I almost hope he gets elected so the exchanges do get implemented so the people see exactly what will happen.

$300/mo is going to destroy the middle class.

I'm unconvinced, with good reason. But try again and I'll go over it later when I return.
 
Four years ago, mine went from $85 a month to $235 a month. Who do I blame?

There is no logical reason for it to go up. We can compare polices all we want, but the fact remains, there is nothing in reform that should make it go up.

No logical reason? 25 Million additional people to cover. 400% and under 'poverty' gets a subsidy.

Which is why I will have today $300 more a month. And I am not even close to Obama millionaires ($250K).
 
I'm unconvinced, with good reason. But try again and I'll go over it later when I return.

I don't need to convince you of it anymore than you need to convinced the Sun comes up. It's all there to see. I have provided the links, my exact coverage my income and what the Oregon exchange itself says they will charge me.

As I said. Nothing will do for you. Your only good reason is you support Obama. No other logical reason for you to immediately dismiss it.
 
No logical reason? 25 Million additional people to cover. 400% and under 'poverty' gets a subsidy.

Which is why I will have today $300 more a month. And I am not even close to Obama millionaires ($250K).

Yes, with premiums from all of them. So, no, more business means they should lower rates, especially as most those will be healthy people. .
 
I don't need to convince you of it anymore than you need to convinced the Sun comes up. It's all there to see. I have provided the links, my exact coverage my income and what the Oregon exchange itself says they will charge me.

As I said. Nothing will do for you. Your only good reason is you support Obama. No other logical reason for you to immediately dismiss it.

Frankly, I haven't seen your links. I suspect they are from questionable sources, but I'm open to looking at them.
 
Yes, with premiums from all of them. So, no, more business means they should lower rates, especially as most those will be healthy people. .

They aren't paying the full premium. Most of the 25M are poor so the majority of the premium is being subsidized.
 
Again, those don't begin to help you. The argument here the reasons for it. Try again.

Exactly as I said. A link to the plan I have, and the cost and the coverage. A link to the Oregon exchange, what it will cost and all. But still no good.

Shocking.
 
Last edited:
Exactly as I said. A link to the plan I have, and the cost and the coverage. A link to the Oregon exchange, what it will cost and all. But still no good.

Shocking.

NO, it's not. Try to understand the argument. It is that there is not reason for it to go up. None. They get more money with new customers, and most of them are people who are not ill. As such, they make more profit.
 
NO, it's not. Try to understand the argument. It is that there is not reason for it to go up. None. They get more money with new customers, and most of them are people who are not ill. As such, they make more profit.

They do not need to be ill. Any treatment is more demand. More demand without more supply drives costs up. Unless you can explain where the supply for 25M additional demanding patients is going to come from. Preventive care takes more money and resources than immediate care.

And they aren't paying close to the full premium to get that coverage. While I and the rest of the middle class pay higher premiums that you can't reason out.
 
The most eye popping criticism I have heard to date about Obamacare is that it provides for 25 million new "patients" but does provide for 1 new doctor. This is a harsh reality that must be considered. Today the uninsured generally don't require anything accept emergency care. Give them all insurance which makes routine doctor visits essentially free for them and the system is going to get overwhelmed.
 
They do not need to be ill. Any treatment is more demand. More demand without more supply drives costs up. Unless you can explain where the supply for 25M additional demanding patients is going to come from. Preventive care takes more money and resources than immediate care.

And they aren't paying close to the full premium to get that coverage. While I and the rest of the middle class pay higher premiums that you can't reason out.

Try to understand. Well people use less than sick people. Insurance is based on the permise that well people will pay for sick people. If you're right, insurance can never be profitable, which is why you're worng. And yes, the full premium is being paid.
 
Try to understand. Well people use less than sick people. Insurance is based on the permise that well people will pay for sick people. If you're right, insurance can never be profitable, which is why you're worng. And yes, the full premium is being paid.

Try to understand. I can get better coverage for significantly less right now than the exchange will offer.
 
Oh, anyone can have fun with numbers.
The Republicans fought tooth and nail to get the Public Option removed
from the Health Care debate----when they debated at all.
Then they whine about costs going up. Which they also did BEFORE Obamacare.

The story regarding the "extra taxes" don't take into account the "extra customers"
that insurance companies are getting due to Obama care.

The newly insured will be needing checkups and other insurance-covered services.
An X-ray technician, for example, can be trained relatively quickly (months) so Obamacare will be stimulatory.

Even Mitt-A-Sketch says that he likes parts of Obamacare. Although he could change his mind.

As the population gets older, I would rather see a tweaked Obamacare rather than relying on EmergencyRoomCare.
 
Try to understand. I can get better coverage for significantly less right now than the exchange will offer.

Stay focused. There is no logical reason for insurance companies to raise premiums. If they do, then they are merely doing so because they want to. having more business is a boom for them, not a burden.
 
Stay focused. There is no logical reason for insurance companies to raise premiums. If they do, then they are merely doing so because they want to. having more business is a boom for them, not a burden.
Whether you can find a logical reason or not, premiums are going up. They have increased sharply already and you can bet that they aren't ever going to go down. Have insurance rates EVER decreased from the previous year? Your argument seems to be that because you can't seem to find a logical reason for the increase there isn't really a problem. The fact is that the threat of rising premiums was an issue raised by many prior to the passage of Obamacare. It was, of course, dismissed at the time by the supporters of the bill as "fear mongering" and part of a disinformation campaign by right wing loonies.

Well, here we are two years later and guess what? Obamacare passed and premiums have gone up. Surprise, surprise...
 
Whether you can find a logical reason or not, premiums are going up. They have increased sharply already and you can bet that they aren't ever going to go down. Have insurance rates EVER decreased from the previous year? Your argument seems to be that because you can't seem to find a logical reason for the increase there isn't really a problem. The fact is that the threat of rising premiums was an issue raised by many prior to the passage of Obamacare. It was, of course, dismissed at the time by the supporters of the bill as "fear mongering" and part of a disinformation campaign by right wing loonies.

Well, here we are two years later and guess what? Obamacare passed and premiums have gone up. Surprise, surprise...

No you are missing my argument. I'm arguing health care reform is not the reason for the increase. Insurance was increasing long before reform. And as I recall, and as I have always argued, the big thing was not that this would lower premiums, but that more people would be covered. That this would allow people to better manage their health. Now, as long is medicine is seen a a market commodity, a widget, it will always out price a good number of people. And while I don't seek everything for everyone, I do argue that adequate care can be provided cheaper and even better for most than we do now. I believe a two tiered Single payer system would work better here.

But, the argument I am having is that the claim health care reform caused premiums to rise is false.
 
Stay focused. There is no logical reason for insurance companies to raise premiums. If they do, then they are merely doing so because they want to. having more business is a boom for them, not a burden.

Hmm. I could give you a few lessons on focus.

If I can get a policy now for $300 cheaper, and only on the exchange will it cost more... Hmm.
 
Back
Top Bottom