- Joined
- May 16, 2012
- Messages
- 3,142
- Reaction score
- 939
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Re: Obama Administration Watched Them Die And Denied Their Request For Help
Marsdon....there is a STANDING ORDER to protect life, and the Generals would have sent help I have to believe. However, help wasn't sent. So that can only mean ONE THING, that another order, an order that trumps the standing order, had to have been given, and it had to have been a "stand down" order.
The Standing Order is exactly that; a STANDING order. Meaning, it doesn't have to be "given".
Now, this attack involved a US Ambassador. This is important to understand. Because of his involvement, and the US Ambassadors level of priority of 4 stars, we know that the POTUS was involved in the decision making process.
I contest, that during Obama's 5:00pm meeting with Panetta and Clinton in the Oval Office, the decision was made. After all, you have the 3 Principles in the room all at one time; The POTUS, The Sec. Of State, and the Sec. of Defense. The reason I contest this continues to be a cover up, is because just yesterday, the White House replied "NO COMMENT" to a question of when the President first learned that the consulate had been attacked.
He knew right away. I know this because of military protocol, and the system that kicks in when a "Flash Cable" comes into the White House situation room. The message included the language "US Ambassador missing". That would have been HAND DELIVERED to the POTUS as soon as physically possible. We know that occurred, because protocol mandates THAT'S how it's done.
The more we learn, the more we understand how big this lie is.
I think we can assume that somebody in the chain of command failed to make the gutsy call to send in a gunship to at least disperse the attackers. We can also assume that a circumstance such as this would have been seen by everyone in that chain of command as urgent and the news of the attack would have quickly reached the highest levels of the chain of command.
So, while we excoriate the administration for their failure to act in a timely and effective way to save those four souls, there is also blame to be shared by Generals or Admirals closer to the scene who put their careers ahead of these people's lives. SOMEBODY should have issued the order to try to assist them if that order wasn't forthcoming from Washington.
Marsdon....there is a STANDING ORDER to protect life, and the Generals would have sent help I have to believe. However, help wasn't sent. So that can only mean ONE THING, that another order, an order that trumps the standing order, had to have been given, and it had to have been a "stand down" order.
The Standing Order is exactly that; a STANDING order. Meaning, it doesn't have to be "given".
Now, this attack involved a US Ambassador. This is important to understand. Because of his involvement, and the US Ambassadors level of priority of 4 stars, we know that the POTUS was involved in the decision making process.
I contest, that during Obama's 5:00pm meeting with Panetta and Clinton in the Oval Office, the decision was made. After all, you have the 3 Principles in the room all at one time; The POTUS, The Sec. Of State, and the Sec. of Defense. The reason I contest this continues to be a cover up, is because just yesterday, the White House replied "NO COMMENT" to a question of when the President first learned that the consulate had been attacked.
He knew right away. I know this because of military protocol, and the system that kicks in when a "Flash Cable" comes into the White House situation room. The message included the language "US Ambassador missing". That would have been HAND DELIVERED to the POTUS as soon as physically possible. We know that occurred, because protocol mandates THAT'S how it's done.
The more we learn, the more we understand how big this lie is.