• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Jane Roe "Do not vote for Barack Obama, he murders babies" WARNING: GRAPHIC VIDEO

The one issue voters picked their side a long time ago, all Randall Terry's crap does is inflame the opposition at this point.

This poor woman has been manipulated by both sides, for a long time.
 
zimmer said:
The Constitution has something in there... I think it goes... "the right to life..."
Sticking point you see. I agree with JFK's nominee Justice White, and his dissent on the case; a raw grab of judicial power that gives women the right to take life at their whim (paraphrasing).

Obama went further as I noted and you so brilliantly ignored.

I also find it interesting how Jane Roe was useful, and now a bit older and wiser... he stance is "stupid" and "funny". She obviously doesn't think so.

50,000,000 lives snuffed, most for convenience.
Click to expand...

I don't like abortion much either, but you can't forget the other part of the constitution that says "due process of law". And even though I think the due process part of Roe is shaky, it is the law right now. Abortions for any reason are currently not illegal. Nevertheless, I think we should continue to discourage abortion as a solution for just any reason. Any reason generally being babies resulting from consensual sex, except when the mothers life is in danger and there is no other option. I think there is a lot of room to use adoption of the babies to people who can't have their own. And I'm not saying it should encouraged anytime, but possibly just tolerated.
 
Last edited:
zimmer said:
Looks like another Commi-Lib has joined in. Welcome.


You do know Obama's stance on this Trruth?
I doubt it.

Abortion Survivor
"... when he was in the Illinois state senate, Barack Obama voted to deny basic Constitutional Protections for babies born alive from an abortion... not once but our times..."





For all you callous, heartless souls laughing... is it still funny???
Click to expand...


Would you please show us one official record for the number of babies whom have been died as a result of Obama's vote.
 
jakiejakester said:
As the child of German Jews and as a first generation American who's parents had to escape from Germany I find the above referenced quote to be outrageously insulting and inappropriate. I interpret this sort of analogy as being desperate meaning that the argument is so weak that one has to resort to extreme and absurd and insulting references so that people will notice.

Abortion is legal in the US, period. It will ALWAYS be legal from now on. Even in the worst case scenario (Romney miraculously gets elected and chooses a conservative juror) individual states will then decide and abortion will remain legal and available in most states.
Click to expand...

It's nice to hear your parents managed to escape a murderous madman. The most innocent lives, those who have no voice often cannot. 50,000,000 have had no voice. You think they anted their lives to be terminated if they had a choice?
I think the analogy is fitting. You may not like it... OK.

The Supreme court used raw judicial power, at some point it will go back to the states for each to handle... as it should.
 
American said:
I don't like abortion much either, but you can't forget the other part of the constitution that says "due process of law". And even though I think the due process part of Roe is shaky, it is the law right now. Abortions for any reason are currently not illegal. Nevertheless, I think we should continue to discourage abortion as a solution for just any reason. Any reason generally being babies resulting from consensual sex, except when the mothers life is in danger and there is no other option. I think there is a lot of room to use adoption of the babies to people who can't have their own. And I'm not saying it should encouraged anytime, but possibly just tolerated.
Click to expand...

I think it should go back for each state to decide.
 
zimmer said:
For all you callous, heartless souls laughing... is it still funny???
Click to expand...

Considering that conservatives applauded the deaths of people who don't have health insurance, the right wing knows a thing or two about callous, heartless souls.
 
Yeah ... abortion ... that's a winning issue for conservatives. :lol:

Looks like the Tea Party extremists have scuttled the rehubs chances of taking the Senate ... AGAIN ... primarily because of this abortion extremism.
 
Crosscheck said:
No, Obama did not murder your baby. You did. Try a little self responsibility.
Click to expand...

She didn't murder her child.

Thanks to just laws in the state of Texas, she was not allowed to.

Her perjury in court helped a malevolent and / or incompetant Supreme Court pretend the Constitution did not permit such laws to exist. To her credit, she's been working to try and atone for her lies and the awful damage they have done.
 
Based on what I see every day, we simply don't have enough abortions.

Pick up the pace and in 18 years, unemployment rates will drop.

Humans have a really high opinion of themselves but really, they're monkeys that use forks. God loves every kitten as mich as he loves you and the kittens are much, much cuter.
 
Zyphlin said:
My only take away on this is that the Roe in Roe v Wade is actually now pro-life. Had never heard that. Wow, that would be an interesting moral delimmia I would not wish on anyone.

Also, Murder is a legal term...there's no murder here.

There's multiple reasons to vote against Obama...yet so often Republicans always have to go back to the emotional heart string tugging abortoin issue
Click to expand...

It's interesting you never heard that. She's been active in the pro-life movement for almost 20-years.

You would think the MSM would have her on each of their networks to discuss this... but it is something they simply do not want to touch. She served their purposes, now go to hell. A little like Patty Sheehan.
 
Zyphlin said:
My only take away on this is that the Roe in Roe v Wade is actually now pro-life. Had never heard that. Wow, that would be an interesting moral delimmia I would not wish on anyone.

Also, Murder is a legal term...there's no murder here.

There's multiple reasons to vote against Obama...yet so often Republicans always have to go back to the emotional heart string tugging abortoin issue
Click to expand...

Yeah... go back to valuing life. Isn't that just terrible.
You do know that ad was paid by a Democrat? I don't know if Jane Roe is an R or D... do you?

These folks simply want to save lives of unborn children, and because there is a LOOPHOLE in the election laws... this is THE ONLY TIME they can put out so direct ads about it. Isn't that odd as well? You'd think that between 23:00 and 04:00 there would be time to drop a few messages about "life"... but no...
 
AdamT said:
Yeah ... abortion ... that's a winning issue for conservatives. :lol:

Looks like the Tea Party extremists have scuttled the rehubs chances of taking the Senate ... AGAIN ... primarily because of this abortion extremism.
Click to expand...

Yet, you wimps still refuse to put this up to a real vote in the states.

Grow a pair.
 
zimmer said:
It's interesting you never heard that. She's been active in the pro-life movement for almost 20-years.

You would think the MSM would have her on each of their networks to discuss this... but it is something they simply do not want to touch. She served their purposes, now go to hell. A little like Patty Sheehan.
Click to expand...

I think you meant to say Cindy Sheehan. If so, you're spot on. She was handy when Bush was President. Not so much when Obama was still sending in troops to be killed.
 
specklebang said:
Based on what I see every day, we simply don't have enough abortions.

Pick up the pace and in 18 years, unemployment rates will drop.

Humans have a really high opinion of themselves but really, they're monkeys that use forks. God loves every kitten as mich as he loves you and the kittens are much, much cuter.
Click to expand...

41% of New York City pregnancies end in abortion | 7online.com

41 percent of pregancies in NYC are aborted. 60 PERCENT of black babies.

How much is enough for you?
 
tres borrachos said:
Not every gun owner kills someone. But every aborted fetus ends up dead.
Click to expand...

Well then the law talked about in the OP is completely pointless. Therefore Obama voting against it doesn't actually mean anything. Problem solved.

edit: correction, wasn't op. The "babies who survive abortion" law.
 
Last edited:
IF this is THE jane rowe then this thread is stupid. Do any of you remember who she was? She was a sometime drunk/hooker who got pregnant. About ten years ago the pro life people paid her money (as I remember 10K) to change her view of abortion. They lauded it as "the truth has finally come out about abortions and Jane R.. this went pretty well until a reported got hold of the story then it blew up in the prolifes face.
She is not credible and so whatever she says is just more of the same.
 
wolfman24 said:
IF this is THE jane rowe then this thread is stupid. Do any of you remember who she was? She was a sometime drunk/hooker who got pregnant. About ten years ago the pro life people paid her money (as I remember 10K) to change her view of abortion. They lauded it as "the truth has finally come out about abortions and Jane R.. this went pretty well until a reported got hold of the story then it blew up in the prolifes face.
She is not credible and so whatever she says is just more of the same.
Click to expand...

So drunks who get pregnant aren't credible?
 
Until we reach 100%, we simply have too many people competing for too few resources.

Children should be allowed by permit only and those permits should cost enough to create a significant savings account for this new person you want to impose on society.

Frankly, I doubt those figures are accurate. But I don't know. Unfortunately, no truth is required for "news reporting" and many can not distinguish between truth and fiction.

Erod said:
41% of New York City pregnancies end in abortion | 7online.com

41 percent of pregancies in NYC are aborted. 60 PERCENT of black babies.

How much is enough for you?
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom