• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

War on Seniors and the Middle Class

washunut

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
14,203
Reaction score
4,664
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
Not sure why more has not been made on the war on seniors and the middle class by this administration in concert with the Federal Reserve.

Seniors, who have retired usually looked at their total pool of monies which would cover their living expenses going forward. The policies of this administration and the Fed have allowed CD rates to fall from 3-5% to perhaps 1%. This difference may mean that people who could live inexpensively but somewhat comfortably, now are in dire staits.

For the middle class, those who are saving in a 401K for a 529 to save for their children's education now have to move from safer bonds to riskier stocks. Look to the Clinton tech bubble and the Bush housing bubble to see how the average individual investor does when forced to take on additional risk to achieve yield.

Has there been one question in two debates on this issue. Has a station like PBS which can do in depth reviews of issues taken on what this will mean to millions who can now longer go back into the workforce ( older retired) to make up for this shortfall or the angst of younger middle class workers as they try to figure out how to save for their retirement or the education of their kids. If not, why not.

Not sure if this site is appropriate for such a discussion, but thought I would give it a try.
 
Since Clinton, our economy has moved so much toward revenue over equity that it is more important to spend rather than save. Saving does not create revenue--consume, consume, consume.
 
Back
Top Bottom