• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Why would anyone want the economy to continue as it has under Obama?

IndepCentristMA

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
2,110
Reaction score
669
Location
Boston, MA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
Why would anyone want the economy to continue as it has under Obama?

It's sad that the liberal media are doing everything they can to paint the current state of the economy as positive (for Obama, that is)... when in actuality the economy is really struggling...

If the economy was doing so well, why is it that the GDP has been slowing? why is it that the rate of growth of the GDP slowed below inflation? Why did the Fed estimate increasing interest rates? Why is it inflation is going to be increased? How is it that the U6 has not changed, and unemployment numbers released left California out of their analysis (when CA has one of the higher rates of unemployment in the country)?

The truth is the economy is quite stagnant...

real-gdp-vs-climbing-limo-forecast-vs-modifed-limo-forecast-2012-Q2-Third-Estimate.png


People say it's the Republican's whose partisan politics makes them root for a bad economy... No... those are straight numbers in that graphic, which show the real gdp, growing at a slower rate than we did under the Bush economy from 2003-2007... and that was without the extra trillion dollars a year meant to stimulate it...

News Release: Gross Domestic Product

Q1 2012 was half as much as Q4 2011... Q2 2012 has been revised to 1.3%... Numerous early estimates of Q3 2012 all average to significantly below 2%... Which has prompted the Fed to want to get involved...

Federal Reserve may cut benchmark interest rates to boost US economy - Economic Times

100812AAthumbGIF2012104963.jpg



The Job numbers aren't good either... There's been another drop of unemployment %, which looks good for the president if you're looking at that... Still 7.8% unemployment is WAY TOO HIGH... Especially when that drop in unemployment has been fueled by 2 negative factors, 1) People dropping out of the workforce, and 2) Temporary government jobs... Those aren't things which are positive indicators of a growing economy... they're further indicators that people are being left out of this economy...

I am part of that temporary government hiring. I work for a state agency which has brought on numerous short-term temporary workers, for 2 weeks or less. We have specific projects which have suddenly come up, and this spur of hiring makes numbers move, but we are laying them all off. I personally have been involved with the hiring/firing of 12 temporary workers in the last 3 weeks, and will be laying off the last 8 of them on Wednesday. I am just 1 low level state worker, as well. This is going on nationwide.

Even where the growth is occurring it’s not in industries which translate to jobs nationwide. It's in healthcare, hospital, and other industries, which weren't struggling to begin with... Areas that have been have continued to struggle, such as Manufacturing, Electronics, and Print industries... where jobs were lost in this recent report.
That jobs report which kept getting reported as such great news was filled with other bad indicators.

Employment Situation Summary

“The unemployment rates for teenagers (23.7 percent), blacks (13.4 percent), and Hispanics (9.9 percent) were little changed.”

I could’ve sworn that just said the major groups who heavily endorse Obama are struggling perhaps the most… Now, they still support Obama, by the numbers, but… How enthusiastic are there groups going to be this time around?

“The number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks or more) was little changed at 4.8 million and accounted for 40.1
percent of the unemployed.”

I could’ve sworn that just said that 40% of those on unemployment have been there for over 27 weeks… That’s a lot of people out there on long term unemployment, with little job creation meaning little hope of those people actually finding jobs… and bound to join the ranks of the discouraged workers…

That’s not a positive… I know there are some signs of growth… but when 110-120K people become eligible to enter the workforce each month, and there are only 115K jobs created… that does little to get any of the 800K discouraged workers each month jobs…

So right now… the president is going around celebrating a net neutral job number… and failing to mention the forgotten employees who have slipped through the cracks, and now are not counted in employment stastics…


These aren’t just random numbers either… Obama’s policies are against growth. They prevent hiring and investment. The reasons? ObamaCare as well as market and tax uncertainty.

ObamaCare has been stated by numerous companies to be the reason why they intend on cutting employees to get below 50 or cover the increased costs of employment, won’t expand employment, focus on hiring temporary and contract employees, etc.

There is enough market uncertainty with the European debt crisis and trouble in the Asian markets. We don’t need tax uncertainty also preventing investment. Obama has on numerous occasions threatened to raise personal income taxes, capital gains taxes, etc. This has prevented people from wanting to keep their income here, invest in our companies, or start up new ventures. Many of those new or small start-up companies start as s-corp’s and get taxed as individuals, and they also rely on capital gains to expand. So why would someone bother taking that risk, when Obama has advocated increasing taxes on them from 35% to about 40%, and then raising capital gains taxes from 15% to 23.5%? That’s why most business organizations are against Obama in this election.


The other thing that holds the economy down at the moment are the high fuel prices.

We all saw Obama talk up a big stink about getting us independent from foreign oil… but we are basically just as dependent, and hurting as a result of the steady rise in costs of fuel under the Obama administration. The Obama administration’s strict regulation on the Coal Industry was a specifically policy he even detailed as something which would basically bankrupt anyone trying to start a new coal plant.

This is also someone who has said he wanted fuel prices to rise gradually, how he could see prices rising to over $10/gal, and who then as president hired an energy secretary who said that same year that he wanted gas prices to go to European levels. He has failed to sign the Keystone Pipeline XL extension bill which not only would create jobs, but increase the amount of oil fed directly to the refineries in the South Central US.


So, if we assume that these “positive” economic indicators of the Obama economy are the course we’d want to take, we’d be guaranteed to see;


Sustained high unemployment/underemployment
september_alt_unemployment.png

http://greenewable.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/u6.gif



A continuing steep drop in the workforce participation rate
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
latest_numbers_LNS11300000_2002_2012_all_period_M09_data.gif


High fuel prices
Historical Gas Price Charts - GasBuddy.com
ch.gaschart

Colder winter will increase heating costs - Oct. 10, 2012
Oil-Heated Homes to Face Steep Price Increases - LIHEAP Clearinghouse
EIA projects record winter household heating oil prices in the Northeast - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)


An Exponential increase in entitlement spending
Are Entitlements Corrupting Us? Yes - WSJ.com
Medicare and Other Entitlements Are Crowding Out Spending on Defense
The Silent Entitlements Monster: Social Security, Medicare And Interest On The Debt Will Gobble Up Every Single Tax Dollar By 2020
Rise in Entitlement Spending Draws New Focus
America's budget: The elephant in the room | The Economist


Rising federal debt
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...its_vs._National_Debt_Increases_2001-2010.png


These are not good economic numbers… and certainly not something most Americans want more of the same of…


So, I ask again, why would anyone want the economy to continue as it has under Obama?
 
Last edited:
You do realize that was the bubble, right? that was the artificially created strong growth that was not sustainable. The bubvble popped, and reality smacked us around. I know you want to go back into the matrix, but it is not real.
 
I don't want the economy to stay on the same track. I just don't think there's an option this cycle.
 
I certainly don't want the Obama economy to continue. That's why I'm not voting for either major party candidate.

I'm voting for Gary Johnson.
 
You do realize that was the bubble, right? that was the artificially created strong growth that was not sustainable. The bubvble popped, and reality smacked us around. I know you want to go back into the matrix, but it is not real.

You do realize that 1.3% growth doesn't create jobs right? Now go back to apologizing for Obama.
 
You do realize that was the bubble, right? that was the artificially created strong growth that was not sustainable. The bubvble popped, and reality smacked us around. I know you want to go back into the matrix, but it is not real.

Oh... the bubble? Is that your lame defense?

The bubble is why there's been a steep and unprecidented drop in the workforce participation rate of about 2.5% since this president took over?

The bubble is why fuel prices have steadily risen under this president?

The bubble is why there is long term unemployment?

no... the reality is that Obama's policies have created a poor environment for business and investment...

his policies punish growth, they punish success, they prevent hiring, they stiffle existing businesses, they have increased fuel costs to push his green agenda, they encourage government dependence rather than individual responsibility, etc.
 
I certainly don't want the Obama economy to continue. That's why I'm not voting for either major party candidate.

I'm voting for Gary Johnson.
A Gary Johnson vote does nothing to change the Obama economy... and perhaps could do enough to ensure there is a continuance of the Obama economy...
 
I don't want the economy to stay on the same track. I just don't think there's an option this cycle.

Riiiiiiiight... Cuz Mitt Romney hasn't ever stimulated growth, created jobs, balanced a budget, etc. :roll:

We got one guy in office who is an economic novice, who has reigned over economic malaise at best...

We got another who has been successful at fiscal turnarounds everywhere he has been the executive of...

No difference there...
 
Oh... the bubble? Is that your lame defense?

The bubble is why there's been a steep and unprecidented drop in the workforce participation rate of about 2.5% since this president took over?

The bubble is why fuel prices have steadily risen under this president?

The bubble is why there is long term unemployment?

no... the reality is that Obama's policies have created a poor environment for business and investment...

his policies punish growth, they punish success, they prevent hiring, they stiffle existing businesses, they have increased fuel costs to push his green agenda, they encourage government dependence rather than individual responsibility, etc.

spot on Indep!
 
Oh... the bubble? Is that your lame defense?

The bubble is why there's been a steep and unprecidented drop in the workforce participation rate of about 2.5% since this president took over?

The bubble is why fuel prices have steadily risen under this president?

The bubble is why there is long term unemployment?

no... the reality is that Obama's policies have created a poor environment for business and investment...

his policies punish growth, they punish success, they prevent hiring, they stiffle existing businesses, they have increased fuel costs to push his green agenda, they encourage government dependence rather than individual responsibility, etc.

No, that is the end of the effects of the bubble that burst. You are really wrong.
 
I certainly don't want the Obama economy to continue. That's why I'm not voting for either major party candidate.

I'm voting for Gary Johnson.

Youre voting for Obama.. please consider not wasting your vote and helping to get a better leader in in Mitt..
 
No, that is the end of the effects of the bubble that burst. You are really wrong.

with Obama you dont have to worry about a bubble.. the economy will be destroyed..and might as well toss in your freedom and liberty
 
Just as long as you realize what we had was basically a crime.

oh please.. what we have now is the new benchmark for criminal and destructive..

who ya fooling.. there is not one stat you can point to that cant be debunked as pure Obama BS.
 
Also, the president doesn't control gas prices. :coffeepap
 
A Gary Johnson vote does nothing to change the Obama economy... and perhaps could do enough to ensure there is a continuance of the Obama economy...

A vote for Romney ensures the continuation of the Obama economy. Romney isn't going to change anything. They are practically identical.
 
Just as long as you realize what we had was basically a crime.

I need some help with this. What crime has Romney basically committed?
 
with Obama you dont have to worry about a bubble.. the economy will be destroyed..and might as well toss in your freedom and liberty

I'm going to start counting how many of your posts imply that Obama's second term would incite the apocalypse.

Riiiiiiiight... Cuz Mitt Romney hasn't ever stimulated growth, created jobs, balanced a budget, etc. :roll:

We got one guy in office who is an economic novice, who has reigned over economic malaise at best...

We got another who has been successful at fiscal turnarounds everywhere he has been the executive of...

No difference there...

Romney has been successful at fiscal turnarounds everywhere? I didn't know that.

And economic novice is hardly the term for Obama. If the economy is growing, even if slowly, he's got to have some idea of what he's doing.
 
Why would anyone want the economy to continue as it has under Obama? ...............

A: Because the competitive marketplace is not their savior. The government teat is. It's not complicated.
 
Romney has been successful at fiscal turnarounds everywhere? I didn't know that................

OK. I believe you. You did not know. So what ?

Get educated.
 
No, that is the end of the effects of the bubble that burst. You are really wrong.

LMFAO.... right... you do realize the bubble burst in 2008... the recession ended officially in Q2 of 2009... this is over 3 years since then... It's time you wake up to that... This isn't because of the bubble bursting... this is the Obama economy...

Also, I love how you fools continually try to blame Bush's policies for causing the bubble to burst... How exactly did Bush cause a housing bubble in Ireland? How did Bush cause a housing bubble to burst in Iceland? How exactly did Bush cause a bubble to burst in the UK? How did Bush cause a bubble to burst in Spain, Italy, Greece, Portugal, etc.?

How exactly did the bubble bursting cause companies to pick up and move to China, in a process that preceded the housing bubble itself even? How exactly did the bubble bursting cause companies to lay people off right now?

Excuses are all you have...

The truth is Obama's restrictions, high tax rates or tax increase proposals, the high fuel prices, the high cost of labor, etc. are what's causing the uncertainty in the marketplace that holds back hiring and investment, and causes companies to pick up and take their business in other countries with move favorable conditions...

This is called globalization... you can wake up to it and compete in it the best way you can in order to survive... or you can try to fight it, become isolationist... and end up like N Korea, Cuba, and the old China economy...

High taxation, government sponsored industry, and equal pay for labor collectives has been tried in several places in the modern era... and it has always lead to stagnation... That's why Eastern Europe freed itself from Soviet Socialism... It's why China opened its economy...

This has nothing to do with Bush, Republicans, or American politics... it's the reality of the global marketplace, the digitalization of society, etc.

Business cycles haven't been invented in the US recently either... it's not unheard of to have a business cycle expansion and contraction... It's just when you do certain things, it makes a recovery from that contraction slower, and increases the likelihood of another contraction...
 
Wasn't Romney against the auto bailout that saved thousands of jobs and produced record profits the year after? I just can't bring myself to vote for someone who would've let the three major US auto manufacturers go under. Not to mention, he thinks you should be able to roll the windows down in an airplane.
 
Back
Top Bottom