• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Fact-checking the Denver presidential debate

They didn't even fact check Obama's claim about health care premiums... Why do you suppose that is?

Politifact is partisan nonsense... Try the Associated Press if you want something that resembles centrist.
 
They didn't even fact check Obama's claim about health care premiums... Why do you suppose that is?

Politifact is partisan nonsense... Try the Associated Press if you want something that resembles centrist.

The truth meter is pretty accurate though for the several issues that are there.
 
You're wasting your time bro. Conservatives are just going to ignore the lies.

I want to know about the 90 billion dollars in tax credits Obama granted green energies. It must be true if the very left Tampa Bay Times neglected to fact check it. Obama didn't deny or defend it. And it was devastating.
 
Why didn't they bother to fact check this line from Obama:

And over the last two years, health care premiums have gone up, it’s true, but they’ve gone up slower than any time in the last 50 years. So we’re already beginning to see progress.​

Explain the omission of that blatant lie?
 
I want to know about the 90 billion dollars in tax credits Obama granted green energies. It must be true if the very left Tampa Bay Times neglected to fact check it. Obama didn't deny or defend it. And it was devastating.

Romney Tax Plan Needs Growth to Add Up: Reality Check - Bloomberg
Green Jobs
The Claim: Romney, criticizing Obama’s focus on alternative energy, told the president that “$90 billion, and these businesses, many of them have gone out of business, I think about half of them of the ones that have been invested in, have gone out of business, a number of them happen to be owned by people who were contributors to your campaigns.”

The Background: Romney is referring to the amount of money for clean energy in the 2009 economic stimulus, including a program that gave a $535 million loan guarantee to Solyndra LLC, the solar panel maker that later went bankrupt.

The Facts: While Romney is right the stimulus provided $90 billion for clean-energy programs, he wrongly gives the impression all of it went directly to companies like Solyndra. In fact, the stimulus also retrofitted low-income homes to lower their energy costs, provided tax breaks to wind and solar producers, and funded research to reduce coal pollution. Of the $90 billion, $16 billion was spent on the loan-guarantee program that financed Solyndra. Three of the 28 companies that received guarantees later filed for bankruptcy, a slower rate of failure than anticipated by Congress, according to an analysis released in February. Investors in the companies that benefited include both Democratic and Republican donors.
 
Why didn't they bother to fact check this line from Obama:

And over the last two years, health care premiums have gone up, it’s true, but they’ve gone up slower than any time in the last 50 years. So we’re already beginning to see progress.​

Explain the omission of that blatant lie?

They said they'll be updating with more claims. Going back over 50 years takes more than an hour or two.

We'll see if they do have more, but that's what they're saying now.
 
It must be true if the very left Tampa Bay Times neglected to fact check it.

I assume then, that you're very familiar with the Tampa Bay Times. Or is your assessment based on "they picked on Mitt, therefore they're biased."

It's predictable that you have nothing to say about the things they did cover. Blame the media!
 
Here's a few more other than just politifact. As I learned with the Conventions, it's FAR better to look at MULTIPLE fact checkers, see which things are reported by multiple, see which things ones claim is a lie/truth that the others disagree with, and actually make a judgement based on ALL the informatoin presented

ABC News

Factcheck.org

The WAPO Fact Checker
 
I assume then, that you're very familiar with the Tampa Bay Times. Or is your assessment based on "they picked on Mitt, therefore they're biased."

It's predictable that you have nothing to say about the things they did cover. Blame the media!

They have been cited for years as fact checkers. Strangely enough they always come down on the the same side.
 
They have been cited for years as fact checkers. Strangely enough they always come down on the the same side.

I'm assuming you're gonna mention the "Liberal" side. Did you consider they may be telling the truth and the other premise is the lie?
 
Proof that what is true? How about you detail out what you're saying?


The Facts: While Romney is right the stimulus provided $90 billion for clean-energy programs
 
Back
Top Bottom