• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

What is Obama's Plan to improve your life

I'm pretty successful... thus, Obama has absolutely no plans to improve my life.

he'll try to worsen it a bit.. but he won't succeed.
 
Best way to incentivize corporations to stay or come home is to tax overseas profits of American corporations and disallow deduction of overseas machinery and equipment.
 
then allow me.

1. Incentivize manufacturers to stay or return to america and hire american workers.
2. Pass the buy american bill (exempt canadians please) for all government contracts.
3. Enforce or impose existing trade tarrifs against china (et.al.) dumping manufactured goods in US.
4. Invest in new technologies like green energy (a longer term payoff, but massively important)
5. Improve access to higher education for all capable citizens.
6. Invest in badly needed new infrastructure:roads, ports, airports, rail, schools,
7. Sign more trade agreements
8. Incentivize/reward small businesses hiring.
9. Establish broad range of re-training opportunities for existing workforce.
10. Provide mortgage assistance for underwater mortgages (stablize housing market where the bulk of middle class equity resides)
11. End currency wars.
12. Enact consumer protection regulations for consumer credit suppliers (credit cards, mortgages, loans)
13. Enact banking regulations that significantly increase asset ratios of lending institutions
14. impose limits on esoteric financial instruments like derivatives


That is a quick list. there's lots more that both sides agree needs to be done, but differ on how, like tax code reform, entitlement reform, programs rationalizaton.




The "devaluing" of the american dollar is transient., It does go up and down like a toilet seat. However, since the Fed seems to have absolutely NO trouble in selling billions more dollars, the financial world doesn't seem quite as concerned as you about it, and inflation isn't an issue at this point.

No doubt you are familiar with the simple strategy of "buy low, sell high". Its a fundamental part of capitalism. Are you suggesting that Obama is responsible for this particular strategy?


I am barack Obama and I approve this ad
 
..
..but then turn around and rape them in corporate tax hikes. Is he going to at least kiss them first?

Except that nobody is proposing increasing corporate taxes. In fact, this is a rare bi-partisan position. Revise the tax codes.

Buy what? Even 90% of goods at Target are really from Indonesia.

You can't be suggesting that the Federal, State and Local governments all buy the bulk of their requirements from, No, I mean that these levels of Government all have a buy american first policy when they go about spending Taxpayer dollars. I'd say that is a tad more effective than forcing Target to carry american made t-shirts.

So basically destroy freedom of choice for American consumers, thus driving costs up. Good job, Barack.

Wow. Are you at all aware of how international trade works? You seem to be okay with China and india dumping products into the american marketplace. Perhaps you should investigate what dumping is. As for destroying freedom of choice for consumers, I guess that is way more important than leveling the international trade playing field and protecting american producers from getting bent over the couch.,


It's not a "long term payoff" if the company goes under. (See here for all the Obama pet projects that have failed)

You can't seriously be suggesting that successs in technological innovation is somehow guaranteed. Even the venture capital guys are quite happy if they hit one or two outta ten. Supporting leading edge entrepreneurs in emerging markets that regular sources of capital are not yet attracted to is an intelligent long range industrial development plan. Are you at all familiar with the way capital works?

Who doesn't have access to higher education now? I mean...the ones who pursue it, that is.

Lots of people in the lower middle class and the impoverished. You know, those young men and women who go out to flip burgers to help support their families and siblings, people like that who could use student loans that would enable them to go to school instead of flipping burgers. Not every kid has the same opportunities, not every kid has parents that can help them,


'Cause only Obama is interested in that. I'll give you this one, but it's not like he's the only one who's brought this up. No patting-of-the-back on this one.

Except of course that in the last congressional session the republican congress did not support any democratic bills that would have involved increased infrastructure spending. The republicans also don't think that the stimulus couple hundred billion was money well invested. I have not seen or heard a republican candidate Romney or Ryan talk about infrastructure investment. Got any links?


...and then impose those trade tariffs you previously mentioned right? Again...will he kiss these companies before he violates them?

Unreal. do you know anything at all about international trade? About balance of payments and how to eliminate trade deficits?

...but then jack up minimum wage, force 'em into ObamaCare, and impose crushing regulations so that they eventually go under. Mission Accomplished (I guess).

Minimum wage increase is a net positive and should be done in a low inflation period like now. Healthcare is important and in order to be competitive in the labour market ismall businesses will want to offer it as a bennie. I'm not sure what crushing regulations are being proposed for small businesses so they can be crushed by the evil marxist kenyan sharia phony in the white house. Do you have a list of them?

Yes Comrade...more training. Training for "what," we don't know. All the small businesses will be gone, and the corporations will flee overseas. ...but the Union Goons will get their taste though, right?

It would be nice if you could at least discuss things intelligently. If you represent the right's perspective on the economy and how to fix it then the country is really screwed. I guess you are unaware of the "employment gap" where american companies are desperately searching for skilled labor. It would seem that you are unaware that only 20% of companies have provided skills training to their employees in the past five years. More training, improved skills, smarter workforce, greater efficiency, greater quality, larger markets. I think its on page 15 of Economics 101.


Like Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac? Do we have your permission to blame Obama for this, when Fanny/Freddie screw those mortgagees again?

Neither Fanny nor Freddie are engaged in issuing or buying crap mortgages (0 down, NINJA etc). If you actually think that Fannie and Freddie were the only culprits in the meltdown, you have not been paying attention, or you watch fox news. The fed is buying 40billion a month for the next few months to help stabilize the market.


Yes Comrade...more crushing regulation. Jack up those costs of doing business, so that they can pass those costs onto the consumer.
Crushing regulation about not raping and pillaging consumers? Jack up costs how so? Does it mean that these financial services companies who have been ripping off their customers for years are going to have to increase their fees because their obscene profit margin gravy train is coming to an end? I am begining to see where your priorities are.


gain with the crushing regulations. Do you really want a home loan at 10% interest?

Well, another example of you not knowing what you are talking about. The banking regulations such as higher liquidity ratios will not impact interest rates for consumer loans. do you know how interest rates are set on any given day? Surely you are not one of those people who think that wall street is capable of policing itself are you? Or does watching them rape america appeal to your more voyeuristic side?

ith the regulations.

Seems you got regulationitis. Who needs clean air and water. Who needs contaminent free food. Who needs speed limits. Who needs product safety standards. And for sure if you think that not regulating esoteric securities backed derivative products is a good idea, then why are you complaining about the recession?

Seriously...wouldn't it just be easier for all the liberals to just move to North Korea? I mean....they pretty much have EVERYTHING you guys whine about wanting.

No, I think it would be much more cost effective if the righties stopped thinking they knew what they were talking about and actually learned some basic economics and how a national economy works within a global structure.

Your commie references further reinforce the need for education. I have yet to hear any credible argument from the right on exactly how obama is a socialist or a marxist or for that matter what those terms actually mean. Hell, I just read an article from a repundit calling Obama's socialist agenda really being corporatist. In other words the socialist is also the fascist.
Dont get me started on the totally bogus "distribution of wealth is commie evil" argument.
 
Best way to incentivize corporations to stay or come home is to tax overseas profits of American corporations and disallow deduction of overseas machinery and equipment.

not really. It would just make US corporations rejig their international subsidiary structure. Particularly all the big public companies.
Net result, lawyers and accountants get rich, companies don't come back or stay because of tax regulation.
 
So, tax breaks for big business. Something his party always rails against. Hmm..
Protectionism does not work.
He doesn't have the balls.
I.E. Waste more money on more solynrdrias.
Left wing code for 'make college free'. Thus more government spending and more debt on our backs.
Ah, let the Fed earmark more 'payola' to friends for projects that states should be taking care of themselves.
More specificty required. I believe he has signed ZERO trade agreement's so far.
More tax breaks for business... wow.
More federal government involvement in stuff it does not have the power to be involved in. This is an issue for the states.
Put more debt on the backs of everyone to buy more votes....
??

You are sadly misinformed about much of the above.

How many MORE regulations do we need? And what will they cost?

Quite a few new regulations are required, and many more should be scrapped as archaic and or ineffective and or hindrances.
How much should clean air, clean water, clean food, financial regulations to avoid meltdowns, etc. cost? The real question is not how much the regulations may cost, but what will the cost be if there are no regulations. (wanna another financial meltdown because the financial industry were allowed to run amok?)
 
You are sadly misinformed about much of the above.

Oh my, there's a hard hitting response. About the equivalant of the second grade 'NO, YOU ARE!'

How about some details, like when Obama said ANY of that? Or perhaps a single bit of 'proof' any of that would make a different, or any of it is not as I properly suggested.

Or is that too much work for a user that just signed up that thinks putting 'undisclosed' in someway hides the reality behind their partisanship...
 
You are sadly misinformed about much of the above.



Quite a few new regulations are required, and many more should be scrapped as archaic and or ineffective and or hindrances.
How much should clean air, clean water, clean food, financial regulations to avoid meltdowns, etc. cost? The real question is not how much the regulations may cost, but what will the cost be if there are no regulations. (wanna another financial meltdown because the financial industry were allowed to run amok?)

Regulations are costing people their jobs. Last week another 8 coal mines were shut down and those people lost their jobs. If people don't care about people losing their jobs they will care when their electric bill goes sky high.
 
Regulations are costing people their jobs. Last week another 8 coal mines were shut down and those people lost their jobs. If people don't care about people losing their jobs they will care when their electric bill goes sky high.
Coal mines are closing as natural gas is eating their lunch because natural gas has become cheaper. Not just cheaper in “far less pollution, so less cost to our society as a whole” cheaper, which regulations are trying to model to avoid the distortion of the markets by screw-you-I-got-mine syndrome, but also straight up commodity price per unit of energy cheaper.

Welcome to the free[ish] markets, they are a bitch.
 
Regulations are costing people their jobs. Last week another 8 coal mines were shut down and those people lost their jobs. If people don't care about people losing their jobs they will care when their electric bill goes sky high.

Natural gas is eclipsing coal as the dominant American power source. It's cheaper to use, and cheaper operating costs. It's also reducing our CO2 emissions. Natural gas use has risen 40% while coal has fallen 20%. The price of coal has dropped as well. Plus, we're like the Saudi Arabia of natural gas; 500 trillion cubic feet. The market speaks; natural gas is the new power source for America.

But go ahead and blame Obama for everything, you hack.
 
Oh my, there's a hard hitting response. About the equivalant of the second grade 'NO, YOU ARE!'

How about some details, like when Obama said ANY of that? Or perhaps a single bit of 'proof' any of that would make a different, or any of it is not as I properly suggested.

Or is that too much work for a user that just signed up that thinks putting 'undisclosed' in someway hides the reality behind their partisanship...

I guess you don't pay attention to what Obama says.
He has stated all of those things in State of the Union addresses. On the campaign trail, in press conferences/releases, and in interviews.
It ain't rocket surgery, but a comprehensive vision of moving forward.

However long I have been posting here, does not in anyway absolve you of being uninformed.

You mistake partisanship for my quirk of calling out the uninformed, misinformed, misinterpreted and liars that seem to be characteristic of all partisans. It is a personal observation that the right indulges in these tactics to a greater extent than the left, although the left is pretty good at it too.

PS. I already posted a point by point explanation for someone else who didn't quite grasp many of the benefits of many of those efforts.
 
Natural gas is eclipsing coal as the dominant American power source. It's cheaper to use, and cheaper operating costs. It's also reducing our CO2 emissions. Natural gas use has risen 40% while coal has fallen 20%. The price of coal has dropped as well. Plus, we're like the Saudi Arabia of natural gas; 500 trillion cubic feet. The market speaks; natural gas is the new power source for America.

But go ahead and blame Obama for everything, you hack.

T. Boone Pickens has been touting NG for years now. He was spot on.
 
then allow me.

1. Incentivize manufacturers to stay or return to america and hire american workers.

Blown Away: Tracking stimulus grants for renewable energy | Investigative Reporting Workshop

Solyndra to Declare Bankruptcy | NBC Bay Area

Obama Jokes at Jobs Council: 'Shovel-Ready Was Not as Shovel-Ready as We Expected' - Politics - Fox Nation

2. Pass the buy american bill (exempt canadians please) for all government contracts.

White House Video Praising Solyndra as a Recovery Act Success Story - YouTube

Obama Fundraiser Boasts of Cashing In on Stimulus Package - By Andrew Stiles - The Corner - National Review Online

But as the following video clip reveals, when it comes to steering government funds his way, Kaiser knew exactly what he was doing. Indeed, here he is July 2009 openly boasting about his ability to get his hands on stimulus funding. “There’s never been more money shoved out of the government’s door in world history, and probably never will be again, than in the last few months and in the next 18 months,” he says. “And our selfish parochial goal is to get as much as it for Tulsa and Oklahoma as we possibly can.”

Kaiser cites his “multiple trips to Washington” and his ability to secure meetings with “all the key players in the West Wing of the White House.” He also touts his “almost unique advantage,” through his foundation, of being able to match public dollars with private funding. That way, Kaiser says, the Obama administration will know “we’ll watch over it because we don’t want to be embarrassed with the way our money is spent and so we won’t make you be embarrassed with the way your money is spent either.” Sure, what could possibly go wrong?

3. Enforce or impose existing trade tarrifs against china (et.al.) dumping manufactured goods in US.

President Barack Obama warns against embarrassing China on trade complaints: Plain Dealer interview (updated) | cleveland.com

4. Invest in new technologies like green energy (a longer term payoff, but massively important)

Yea we need more Solyndras! What could possible go wrong?

5. Improve access to higher education for all capable citizens.

Which directly contributes to the skyrocketing cost of high education. Whenever Government subsidizes something the price becomes artificially inflated.

Student Debt: America

Student loans, underwater grads threaten U.S. economy - Chicago Tribune

It's bad enough millions of U.S. homes are underwater, worth less money on the real estate market than needed to pay off the outstanding mortgage balance.

The prospect of millions of Americans dragged under by massive student loans their pricey college educations might not be able to recoup in a weak job market could further challenge the U.S. economy.

6. Invest in badly needed new infrastructure:roads, ports, airports, rail, schools,

That's what the Stimulus was supposed to be for. Oh wait ...

Obama: Shovel-Ready Not as Shovel-Ready as We Expected - YouTube

7. Sign more trade agreements

Obama’s record on outsourcing draws criticism from the left - The Washington Post

He's had 4 years to do that and had a Super Majority the first 2. What was stopping him?

Suddenly Obama is taking Romney's advice? Hilarious

4 Pinocchios for Obama’s newest anti-Romney ad - The Washington Post

8. Incentivize/reward small businesses hiring.

Some small business owners fear impact of Affordable Care Act | WJLA.com

Small businesses are responsible for more than half the new jobs created in this country each year. Many of them say the ruling will make an already tough situation even worse:

9. Establish broad range of re-training opportunities for existing workforce.

DeFazio Fights for Oregon Forest Workers

“The goal of the stimulus bill was to put Americans back to work, not foreign nationals. It is obscene that U.S. companies were rewarded for abusing our American workers and immigration laws to undercut competition and squeeze more profits out of contracts,” said DeFazio. “Oregonians have been logging for over a century, our workforce is one of the best in the world, and these contracts should have been awarded to companies that hire Oregon loggers. This report confirms that federal and state agencies failed to properly oversee the contracts and the companies investigated exploited federal loopholes to avoid hiring American workers. The Department of Labor must address the failings identified in the IG’s report.”

CBO: Obama stimulus may have cost as much as $4.1 million a job | AEIdeas

10. Provide mortgage assistance for underwater mortgages (stablize housing market where the bulk of middle class equity resides)

We're 16 trillion dollars in debt and counting. We are currently in QA3. Bernanke is printing worthless paper to invest in MBS. Where did you get this silly nonsensical list from? It's embarrassing.

Bernanke Defends Fed MBS Buy-Back Program | Benzinga

11. End currency wars.

China, Germany plan to settle more trade in yuan, euros | Reuters

Germany and China plan to conduct an increasing amount of their trade in euros and yuan, the two nations said in a joint statement after talks between Chancellor Angela Merkel and Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao in Beijing on Thursday.

"Both sides intend to support financial institutions and companies of both countries in the use of the renminbi and euro in bilateral trade and investments," said the text of the statement.

Why is Putin stockpiling gold? - MarketWatch

12. Enact consumer protection regulations for consumer credit suppliers (credit cards, mortgages, loans)

Fisher Investments MarketMinder - A Lesson in the Law of Unintended Consequences

Another way Dodd-Frank was to supposedly “protect” Main Street was strict regulation of those much-maligned derivatives. Sure, some investors used derivatives to make risky bets seeking huge returns, but that’s not the sole or even the primary use of derivatives—many financials firms used (and continue to use) derivatives to diversify risk. But derivatives are also prudent tools used to help control costs for many non-financial firms. For example, airlines use derivatives to hedge fuel prices. Likewise, brewers hedge aluminum prices, hops, and energy. Farmers use them en masse to hedge fluctuating produce prices. Derivatives in these instances (when used correctly) are used to help businesses better project future expenditures and prevent wild price volatility for inputs. Which means wild price swings don’t necessarily have to be passed along to consumers in the guise of higher end-product prices. And if derivative use boosts profitability while keeping consumer costs relatively lower (ultimately the aim), isn’t that a good thing?

Dodd-Frank introduces the possibility of increased margin requirements for derivative hedging—which could require non-financial companies to post more capital at banks to offset their hedges. That doesn’t constitute a productive use of free capital that could otherwise be used to hire more employees, build out new factories, or improve existing factories. But, increasing the cost of a hedge also reduces its effectiveness in keeping prices low, so the impact could mean more volatile prices or additional costs for consumers. This would be bad for Joe Six-Pack, who could end up parting with a few more quarters for beer, soda, or whatever flavor he prefers. We greatly doubt many politicians understood that a blanket application of “derivatives are bad” could have this effect.

13. Enact banking regulations that significantly increase asset ratios of lending institutions

What could possibly go wrong?

14. impose limits on esoteric financial instruments like derivatives

Fisher Investments MarketMinder - A Lesson in the Law of Unintended Consequences

Dodd-Frank introduces the possibility of increased margin requirements for derivative hedging—which could require non-financial companies to post more capital at banks to offset their hedges. That doesn’t constitute a productive use of free capital that could otherwise be used to hire more employees, build out new factories, or improve existing factories. But, increasing the cost of a hedge also reduces its effectiveness in keeping prices low, so the impact could mean more volatile prices or additional costs for consumers. This would be bad for Joe Six-Pack, who could end up parting with a few more quarters for beer, soda, or whatever flavor he prefers. We greatly doubt many politicians understood that a blanket application of “derivatives are bad” could have this effect.

The "devaluing" of the american dollar is transient., It does go up and down like a toilet seat. However, since the Fed seems to have absolutely NO trouble in selling billions more dollars, the financial world doesn't seem quite as concerned as you about it, and inflation isn't an issue at this point.

Inflation is a hidden tax

The Rising Price Of the Falling Dollar - Forbes

No doubt you are familiar with the simple strategy of "buy low, sell high". Its a fundamental part of capitalism. Are you suggesting that Obama is responsible for this particular strategy?

Your post is the worst I have ever seen on this forum :2wave:
 

what does any of the above have to do with:
1. Incentivize manufacturers to stay or return to america and hire american workers.?

Oh right. Nothing.



And what does the above have to do with:
2. Pass the buy american bill (exempt canadians please) for all government contracts.

Oh right. Nothing.



Seriously? why dont' you read your own link.
But try again after you have found out that Obama has registerd more objections/complaints to the WTO than any other president. Or that he imposed tariffs on tires and solar panels from china or that he stopped a chinese firm from buying up three wind farms. Little things like that and exactly what it says in your link.


Yea we need more Solyndras! What could possible go wrong?

Surely you are not suggesting that because one company went down (due to illegal chinese dumping it turns out) that supporting emerging technology manufacturing industries is bad? It is precisely because these ventures are risky that they need additional sources of capital. Increasingly it is becoming clear that you don't understand anything about economics.


Which directly contributes to the skyrocketing cost of high education. Whenever Government subsidizes something the price becomes artificially inflated.

Student Debt: America

Student loans, underwater grads threaten U.S. economy - Chicago Tribune

Oh right. this is simply nonsense. As soon as you can concoct a rationale for increased acces to higher education contributing diretly to skyrocketing costs, Please let me know.

Again it would seem you don't read your links or just have comprehension problems. challenge the economy becomes threatens the economy?

you can't possibly be suggesting that student loans should be eliminated so those students wouldn't be in debt? Surely you recognize that it is the spiralling upward cost of higher ed that is the problem. It sure ain't student loans. d'uh.

That's what the Stimulus was supposed to be for. Oh wait ...

Obama: Shovel-Ready Not as Shovel-Ready as We Expected - YouTube

Yes, and to that extent it has worked, its just taken a little more time. You know states wanting money fudging the truth about how ready the projects were? And, there is still a lot more investment that is required. You are aware of how important this is for the economy aren't you?

Obama’s record on outsourcing draws criticism from the left - The Washington Post

He's had 4 years to do that and had a Super Majority the first 2. What was stopping him?

Suddenly Obama is taking Romney's advice? Hilarious

4 Pinocchios for Obama’s newest anti-Romney ad - The Washington Post

do you always make it a habit of not reading your links?
What does a political ad have to do with signing more trade deals - Nothing
Are you objecting to this or are you attempting to say that Obama hasn't done enough in this area? Clarity and remaining on topic seem to be difficult for you, but I'll keep pointing out your lack thereof.


Stop the presses! some small busines owners are worried. Perhaps you should look at some of the tax incentives for small business. Wow, imagine some people being afraid of what they dont' know.


Um, what does the above have to do with retraining? Right. Nothing.

We're 16 trillion dollars in debt and counting. We are currently in QA3. Bernanke is printing worthless paper to invest in MBS. Where did you get this silly nonsensical list from? It's embarrassing.

Bernanke Defends Fed MBS Buy-Back Program | Benzinga

Its already in place and its a positive for the economy. I guess you just drink the koolaid. didn't notice that inflation is not an issue? didn't notice that us treasury notes are still the leading financial instrument in the world? didn't notice that all that money Bernake printed was bought up?

You are right tho. It is embarrasing given all the irrelevant links you have posted. the non-arguments you have offered. the links that you didn't read. and the obvious lack of economic knowledge, I'd be embarassed too.


Your point? Oh you don't have one. silly me.

Fisher Investments MarketMinder - A Lesson in the Law of Unintended Consequences

A devastingly inadequate argument for not implementing consumer protections. Do you actually have any originial thoughts on any of these issues?

What could possibly go wrong?

Well one thing that wouldn't go wrong is that the financial institutions wouldn't get away with bending the american public over the couch and ramming it up their butts. If you think that the financial markets would self regulate, I have a lovely seaside property in Montana I'll let go real cheap to you.



Fisher Investments MarketMinder - A Lesson in the Law of Unintended Consequences
Spoken like the defender of unfettered market activity. It would be worse for joe six pack if they came up with another esoteric "product" like mortgaged backed derivatives. Now that wouldn't be an unintended consquence, nah ain't making money at any cost the name of the game?


Inflation isn't even remotely a hidden tax.
Currently inflation is not a primary concern of any economist.

Your post is the worst I have ever seen on this forum :2wave:

Considering the quality of your non-response, off topic links and demonstrable lack of knowledge, I gladly yield my "title" to you.
:sarcasticclap
 

what does any of the above have to do with:
1. Incentivize manufacturers to stay or return to america and hire american workers.?

Oh right. Nothing.



And what does the above have to do with:
2. Pass the buy american bill (exempt canadians please) for all government contracts.

Oh right. Nothing.



Seriously? why dont' you read your own link.
But try again after you have found out that Obama has registerd more objections/complaints to the WTO than any other president. Or that he imposed tariffs on tires and solar panels from china or that he stopped a chinese firm from buying up three wind farms. Little things like that and exactly what it says in your link.


Yea we need more Solyndras! What could possible go wrong?

Surely you are not suggesting that because one company went down (due to illegal chinese dumping it turns out) that supporting emerging technology manufacturing industries is bad? It is precisely because these ventures are risky that they need additional sources of capital. Increasingly it is becoming clear that you don't understand anything about economics.


Which directly contributes to the skyrocketing cost of high education. Whenever Government subsidizes something the price becomes artificially inflated.

Student Debt: America

Student loans, underwater grads threaten U.S. economy - Chicago Tribune

Oh right. this is simply nonsense. As soon as you can concoct a rationale for increased acces to higher education contributing diretly to skyrocketing costs, Please let me know.

Again it would seem you don't read your links or just have comprehension problems. challenge the economy becomes threatens the economy?

you can't possibly be suggesting that student loans should be eliminated so those students wouldn't be in debt? Surely you recognize that it is the spiralling upward cost of higher ed that is the problem. It sure ain't student loans. d'uh.

That's what the Stimulus was supposed to be for. Oh wait ...

Obama: Shovel-Ready Not as Shovel-Ready as We Expected - YouTube

Yes, and to that extent it has worked, its just taken a little more time. You know states wanting money fudging the truth about how ready the projects were? And, there is still a lot more investment that is required. You are aware of how important this is for the economy aren't you?

Obama’s record on outsourcing draws criticism from the left - The Washington Post

He's had 4 years to do that and had a Super Majority the first 2. What was stopping him?

Suddenly Obama is taking Romney's advice? Hilarious

4 Pinocchios for Obama’s newest anti-Romney ad - The Washington Post

do you always make it a habit of not reading your links?
What does a political ad have to do with signing more trade deals - Nothing
Are you objecting to this or are you attempting to say that Obama hasn't done enough in this area? Clarity and remaining on topic seem to be difficult for you, but I'll keep pointing out your lack thereof.


Stop the presses! some small busines owners are worried. Perhaps you should look at some of the tax incentives for small business. Wow, imagine some people being afraid of what they dont' know.


Um, what does the above have to do with retraining? Right. Nothing.

We're 16 trillion dollars in debt and counting. We are currently in QA3. Bernanke is printing worthless paper to invest in MBS. Where did you get this silly nonsensical list from? It's embarrassing.

Bernanke Defends Fed MBS Buy-Back Program | Benzinga

Its already in place and its a positive for the economy. I guess you just drink the koolaid. didn't notice that inflation is not an issue? didn't notice that us treasury notes are still the leading financial instrument in the world? didn't notice that all that money Bernake printed was bought up?

You are right tho. It is embarrasing given all the irrelevant links you have posted. the non-arguments you have offered. the links that you didn't read. and the obvious lack of economic knowledge, I'd be embarassed too.


Your point? Oh you don't have one. silly me.

Fisher Investments MarketMinder - A Lesson in the Law of Unintended Consequences

A devastingly inadequate argument for not implementing consumer protections. Do you actually have any originial thoughts on any of these issues?

What could possibly go wrong?

Well one thing that wouldn't go wrong is that the financial institutions wouldn't get away with bending the american public over the couch and ramming it up their butts. If you think that the financial markets would self regulate, I have a lovely seaside property in Montana I'll let go real cheap to you.



Fisher Investments MarketMinder - A Lesson in the Law of Unintended Consequences
Spoken like the defender of unfettered market activity. It would be worse for joe six pack if they came up with another esoteric "product" like mortgaged backed derivatives. Now that wouldn't be an unintended consquence, nah ain't making money at any cost the name of the game?


Inflation isn't even remotely a hidden tax.
Currently inflation is not a primary concern of any economist.

Your post is the worst I have ever seen on this forum :2wave:

Considering the quality of your non-response, off topic links and demonstrable lack of knowledge, I gladly yield my "title" to you.
:sarcasticclap
 
PS. I already posted a point by point explanation for someone else who didn't quite grasp many of the benefits of many of those efforts.

Yes, I already read your partisan hackery...
 
If Obama wins, we'll have become a majority welfare state; because that's what he stands for.
 
If Obama wins, we'll have become a majority welfare state; because that's what he stands for.

Just keep watchin' the Euro Zone....That is our fate should we keep Obama in office.
 
Let's see....Obama is forcing me to have the health insurance I already have but to pay more for it so others who don't have it get it for free.....I guess I will eventually figure out how that is an improvement of my life but it is not so clear at this point.
 
No, I'm not going to go through every single one of these again...

Except that nobody is proposing increasing corporate taxes. In fact, this is a rare bi-partisan position. Revise the tax codes.
It's one thing to "revise tax codes." It's another to go on blathering about the "fair share." It's obvious that Obama is in the "bleed the rich" camp.

You can't be suggesting that the Federal, State and Local governments all buy the bulk of their requirements from, No, I mean that these levels of Government all have a buy american first policy when they go about spending Taxpayer dollars.
Whenever you force an entity to buy from "A," then "A" can jack up their costs to whatever level they want. This would, in turn, jack up our taxes.

As for destroying freedom of choice for consumers, I guess that is way more important than leveling the international trade playing field and protecting american producers from getting bent over the couch.
Yes. Freedom of choice for consumers avoids "getting bent over the couch" by the suppliers who know you're forced to buy their goods regardless of price.

You can't seriously be suggesting that successs in technological innovation is somehow guaranteed. Even the venture capital guys are quite happy if they hit one or two outta ten. Supporting leading edge entrepreneurs in emerging markets that regular sources of capital are not yet attracted to is an intelligent long range industrial development plan. Are you at all familiar with the way capital works?
So you're OK that Obama pissed away millions (if not billions) of dollars on "pipe dream" companies who used him as a cash grab?

Lots of people in the lower middle class and the impoverished. You know, those young men and women who go out to flip burgers to help support their families and siblings, people like that who could use student loans that would enable them to go to school instead of flipping burgers.
Name me one person who just flat-out cannot get student loans right now. Just one. I'll wait.

Not every kid has the same opportunities
Yes they do. It's what those kids do with those opportunities is what makes or breaks them.

I have not seen or heard a republican candidate Romney or Ryan talk about infrastructure investment.
Infrastructure investment is done at the state and local level. Obama's sycophantic followers don't know this...that's why he keeps piping up about it. They'll just eat up whatever he says, without question.

Minimum wage increase is a net positive and should be done in a low inflation period like now.
Dictatorial wage increases are what put the smallest businesses in a bind. Go hold your breath and stomp your feet if you don't like it. Won't make it any less true.

Healthcare is important and in order to be competitive in the labour market ismall businesses will want to offer it as a bennie.
Wanna know how I know you don't know a fig about small businesses? I'm not talking about little corporations. I'm talking Mom-and-Pop pizza joint where Mom & Dad work for free because they can barely afford to pay the delivery kids. Hell, a lot of times the kids work for a lower salary as well. What makes you think they can afford all those "bennies." If you want your "bennies," go work for a larger company that can afford them.

I'm not sure what crushing regulations are being proposed for small businesses so they can be crushed by the evil marxist kenyan sharia phony in the white house. Do you have a list of them?
Ever heard of Google?

I guess you are unaware of the "employment gap" where american companies are desperately searching for skilled labor.
I guess you're unaware that American companies are afraid to hire skilled labor because of Obama.

The fed is buying 40billion a month for the next few months to help stabilize the market.
The government is underwater. They're spending more than is coming in. Where do you think they're going to get this 40 billion a month? Oh yeah...rich people....bleed 'em dry.

Crushing regulation about not raping and pillaging consumers? Jack up costs how so? Does it mean that these financial services companies who have been ripping off their customers for years are going to have to increase their fees because their obscene profit margin gravy train is coming to an end? I am begining to see where your priorities are.
I'm beginning to see where you got your business knowledge. Probably MediaMatters or ThinkProgress.

Well, another example of you not knowing what you are talking about. The banking regulations such as higher liquidity ratios will not impact interest rates for consumer loans. do you know how interest rates are set on any given day? Surely you are not one of those people who think that wall street is capable of policing itself are you? Or does watching them rape america appeal to your more voyeuristic side?
I work for a bank. You're bringing a knife to a gunfight, junior.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom