- Joined
- Mar 9, 2012
- Messages
- 6,277
- Reaction score
- 2,052
- Location
- New Mexico
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Re: Obama Projecting to win 90%+ Black Vote, But if Romney wins 75%+ of the White Vot
I believe you are missing the essential Element of Principle 0.
0] All people, regardless of history or minority/majority status, have a right to gather, discuss, and politically advocate the interests of their race, ethnicity, creed, gender, political viewpoint, religion or sexual preferences. Advocating the Interests primarily means seeking to insure truly EQUAL treatment. Advocating the Interests does NOT include asking for or demanding special preferences, treatment, set-asides, payments, benefits, advantages, reparations or exemptions.
This Principle states that all people have a right to advocate their Racial Interests, but that advocacy is limited to asking for NOTHING MORE and hopefully nothing less than exactly what every other race gets.
You are justified in asking for EQUALITY.
You are not justified in asking for special preferences and spoils.
In the Ending Paragraphs of the OP, I go on state that living by these principles, means that you will inherently take on the challenge of insuring that all other races are threated equally.
How is that a Paradox with my goals?
-
I think you will fail at your objective being that you can't even see that this sentence of yours at the beginning of your monologue is a complete paradox.
I believe you are missing the essential Element of Principle 0.
0] All people, regardless of history or minority/majority status, have a right to gather, discuss, and politically advocate the interests of their race, ethnicity, creed, gender, political viewpoint, religion or sexual preferences. Advocating the Interests primarily means seeking to insure truly EQUAL treatment. Advocating the Interests does NOT include asking for or demanding special preferences, treatment, set-asides, payments, benefits, advantages, reparations or exemptions.
This Principle states that all people have a right to advocate their Racial Interests, but that advocacy is limited to asking for NOTHING MORE and hopefully nothing less than exactly what every other race gets.
You are justified in asking for EQUALITY.
You are not justified in asking for special preferences and spoils.
In the Ending Paragraphs of the OP, I go on state that living by these principles, means that you will inherently take on the challenge of insuring that all other races are threated equally.
How is that a Paradox with my goals?
-