• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Romney Paid 1.9 Mllion Dollars in Taxes in 2011

jonny5

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
27,581
Reaction score
4,664
Location
Republic of Florida
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Thats not enough? How much is enough for one person to pay? What does Romney get for his patriotic sacrifice which is larger than 99.9% of americans? He paid 3 million in 2010. Still not enough? How about 10 million? Would that be enough? How about the govt collect everything earns (cap gains essentially)? Hes already rich. He can live off his assets. Too much?

Mitt Romney Taxes: Campaign Releasing 2011 Returns
 
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has released his full 2011 federal income tax returns, fulfilling a commitment he made earlier this year.

Brad Walt, the trustee of the Romney’s blind trust, said the Romneys paid $1,935,708 in 2011 taxes on $13,696,951 in income. He said the Romneys’ effective tax rate for 2011 was 14.1%.

Also in the release, Walt said that during the 20-year period between 1990-2009, the Romneys paid an average federal tax rate of 20.2%.

In January, Romney released a summary of his 2011 taxes. In it, he and his wife, Ann, originally said they filed a joint 1040 reporting a joint income of $21 million and a tax bill of $3.2 million.
Get complete coverage of breaking news on CNN.com, CNN TV and CNN Mobile.
 
Thats not enough? How much is enough for one person to pay? What does Romney get for his patriotic sacrifice which is larger than 99.9% of americans? He paid 3 million in 2010. Still not enough? How about 10 million? Would that be enough? How about the govt collect everything earns (cap gains essentially)? Hes already rich. He can live off his assets. Too much?

Mitt Romney Taxes: Campaign Releasing 2011 Returns

No it is not enough and especially not enough for a guy who wants to be President.

14% effective tax rate... it is even less than the 15% capital gains tax rate, hence he got money BACK from the feds... pathetic.
 
Thats not enough? How much is enough for one person to pay?

It's about a million less than he would have paid if he had paid at my tax rate.
 
14% effective tax rate... it is even less than the 15% capital gains tax rate, hence he got money BACK from the feds... pathetic.

Did he do anything illegal?

If so, maybe he can set his sights on being Secretary of the Treasury.
 
Maybe that's his gross income. He may have donated some of it which reduced his net income. Tax law is tax law. I suppose he could have sent in a few extra million but why should he? Has anybody ever sent in extra?

My view of taxes is that capital gains should be taxed as ordinary income unless the money is actively invested in a domestic enterprise. Unfortunately, they no longer allow me to write the tax codes.



No it is not enough and especially not enough for a guy who wants to be President.

14% effective tax rate... it is even less than the 15% capital gains tax rate, hence he got money BACK from the feds... pathetic.
 
Jeeze it took his accountants that long to figure out how to get over it 14%. :shrug:
 
Thats not enough? How much is enough for one person to pay? What does Romney get for his patriotic sacrifice which is larger than 99.9% of americans? He paid 3 million in 2010. Still not enough? How about 10 million? Would that be enough? How about the govt collect everything earns (cap gains essentially)? Hes already rich. He can live off his assets. Too much?

Mitt Romney Taxes: Campaign Releasing 2011 Returns
Well, at a tax rate of 14.1%, he is paying less of a percentage than some people whose income is in the $30k-$80k range, and when you factor in payroll taxes he's probably paying less of his disposable income than most of the 47% he recently complained about for not paying anything in income taxes.

The fact that 14% for Romney translates to $2 million or so seems pretty insignificant. The US gets about $1.4 trillion in total revenue from its income tax collection. So Romney's contribution amounts to about .0001% of the total. More or less his position on the income scale, no?
 
Thats not enough? How much is enough for one person to pay? What does Romney get for his patriotic sacrifice which is larger than 99.9% of americans? He paid 3 million in 2010. Still not enough? How about 10 million? Would that be enough? How about the govt collect everything earns (cap gains essentially)? Hes already rich. He can live off his assets. Too much?

Mitt Romney Taxes: Campaign Releasing 2011 Returns

I dunno. How much is $100 worth to Romney? If he dropped $100 on the street by accident would he be worried about his heat being turned off? Money has less value per dollar the more of it you have. It's called the law of diminishing marginal utility. Money is no exception from this economic law.
 
My question is even if they had come back saying he paid 20% would that have been enough to win over the left? Doubtful. This was just another campaign smear tactic to show Romney in a bad light.

If his average tax rate over the last 10 years has been 20% then he has paid a higher rate than I have.
 
Tax law is tax law. I suppose he could have sent in a few extra million but why should he? Has anybody ever sent in extra?
Actually, Romney did.
 
My question is even if they had come back saying he paid 20% would that have been enough to win over the left? Doubtful.
No of course not. There are 47% of voters that will vote Obama no matter what.
 
No of course not. There are 47% of voters that will vote Obama no matter what.

If that's true then Romney has a 0% chance of winning.
 
Yes, I suppose he technically did by under claiming his charitable donations. I suppose I respect him for that. What I have a problem with is is desire to stop taxing capital gains which would reduce his tax liability to zero. Very self-serving. Still, he did pay in an extra $280K to keep that to 13.1%.



Actually, Romney did.
 
Well, at a tax rate of 14.1%, he is paying less of a percentage than some people whose income is in the $30k-$80k range,
People with 30k incomes have an effective rate of basically zero. For 80k incomes it is around 6%.
 
My question is even if they had come back saying he paid 20% would that have been enough to win over the left? Doubtful.
I wasn't aware that we vote based on the tax rate payed....what a weird assumption.
This was just another campaign smear tactic to show Romney in a bad light.
This release by the Romney campaign...is a smear tactic? If you say so....lol.

If his average tax rate over the last 10 years has been 20% then he has paid a higher rate than I have.
If....of course we won't really know. I guess the point would be that IF it is true, he would be more likely to release them if they DO show a higher level of taxation....so this claim, this "summary", smells.
 
What I have a problem with is is desire to stop taxing capital gains which would reduce his tax liability to zero. Very self-serving.
Romney has no such desire. He wants to maintain current tax rates on interest, dividends, and capital gains.
 
Okay, that's fine. Now we'd like to see his long form tax returns!
 
He gave $4 million to charity. Bash away, liberals!!
 
He gave $4 million to charity. Bash away, liberals!!
43% to taxes and charity and that's still not enough. Of course not - these are liberals. You could take 100% away and they'd still hate the guy for making so much in the first place.
 
People with 30k incomes have an effective rate of basically zero. For 80k incomes it is around 6%.
:^)

True 'effective rates'.
(link expired but still 'googleable')

Your real tax rate: 40% - MSN Money

2/21/2007
By Scott Burns
Income taxes, sales taxes, property taxes, Social Security and Medicare taxes, 'sin' taxes and the rest add up to a virtual Flat tax nationwide.

We Have a national flat tax, albeit one with bumps and potholes.

The fact that the political parties won't acknowledge this is one reason they are doing a disservice to the voting public.

Instead, both parties have a vested interest in the theatrical possibilities created by the idea of graduated tax rates. Notice that I said "the idea of" graduated tax rates. That should not be confused with reality.
[......]Politicians talk this way because they generally talk about Only One tax: the federal income tax, which offers graduated rates from 10% to 35%.

Politicians rarely talk about what real people experience: the true maze of taxes and government benefits. If someone put them all together, we could see what our Actual tax burden was. We could see who pays at the highest or lowest rates. Discussions of tax policy wouldn't be a waste of time.
Well, two researchers did it.
In a study for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Boston University economists Laurence J. Kotlikoff and David Rapson have found that our All-in marginal tax rate is 40%, give or take a bit. Yes, you read that right: 40%.

Most workers will pay about that much on each dollar of income when All taxes -- federal and state income taxes, sales taxes, taxes for benefit programs, etc. -- are considered.

As a consequence, a 30-year-old couple earning only $20,000 a year has a marginal tax rate of 42.5%, while a 45-year-old couple earning $500,000 pays at 43.2%..."
 
Last edited:
By what logic or reason can be people have an entire party built around public charity actually not give a man credit for being charitable with his own money?
 
Back
Top Bottom