• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Gallup: Race Tightens

Even if Obama wins again, it does not look like he will have the House; If Romney wins, he'd be a fool to bow down to this House---it is going to be a tough next 2 years regardless and maybe 4.
 
Really? You think that's the method Vegas uses to run their sports book, analyze all the data and then pick the team which it says won't win? I really think that there may be some Republicans/Libertarians who are going to require psychiatric help if/when Obama wins again. Many of them are already so disconnected from whatever reality contradicts their desired world view as to be scary.
I really could care less what Vegas does. Has no bearing whatsoever on what I said.
 
I really could care less what Vegas does. Has no bearing whatsoever on what I said.

The bearing it has is that your assertion that clutching at straws is the best way(98% no less) to predict the outcome of a contest is laughable at best and the sign of desperate wishful thinking at worst.
 
Today Gallup has them tied 47-47 among registered voters.


The President's approval is also negative (though within the margin of error) at 46 to 48%. Traditionally incumbents have gotten a percentage of the vote that roughly mirrors their approval going in to the election.

But, but, they said that Romney was finished.
 
But, but, they said that Romney was finished.

Yeah. Kinda surprising how we keep getting surprised that those who live inside the SuperZip bubble really have very little connection to the rest of America.
 
The bearing it has is that your assertion that clutching at straws is the best way(98% no less) to predict the outcome of a contest is laughable at best and the sign of desperate wishful thinking at worst.
98% is a descriptive statistic, i.e. "a fact"
 
98% is a descriptive statistic, i.e. "a fact"

Then please present evidence to support your invented "fact". Since clutching at straws would imply a random selection of the winner not based on any statistical data, the laws of probability say that it should be no more accurate than flipping a coin or 50% in a contest between two individuals.
 
Back
Top Bottom