• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

How will Romney's anti-poor campaign play in the heavily-subsidized red states?

Strange.

So you have two individuals. One's a Republican, one's a Democrat. Both are lower-class. Both rely on Federal entitlement spending. But only the Democrat believes that he is "entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it"?

And you continue with your habit of addressing what you wish I said, rather than what I said. (That explains this thread, actually.)

That has nothing to do with the fact that Romney referred to Obama's base, and not Republicans, and it was explicit.


If it makes them even look at third-party alternatives, then I am all for it.

All for what? It not mattering to them, as it almost certainly won't? Maybe it's that you don't even bother to read what I write, rather than just ignoring it, and then just post whatever comes to mind.


What happens when it's the Republican engaging in class warfare?

Whatever happens, it doesn't help your premise in THIS thread, and instead is a post fit for a discussion in some imaginary thread as a response to a growing list of posts I didn't make.

I guess this really IS the best you can do.
 
I don't have one. I'm reciting it from memory. I could be off; Google it yourself.
I have goggled it, and i know you are making up those numbers ( it's not a matter of forgetting, it's a matter of creating them out of thin air)

I know you got no details from the author of the graph.. he specifically stated he used raw data ( in 2005).. he created the graph after watching West Wing.."for fun".
he specifically rejects what he calls " rationalizations" for the raw data.
 
Back
Top Bottom