• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Where Would Romney Be Without the Media?

LowDown

Curmudgeon
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
14,185
Reaction score
8,768
Location
Houston
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
The media does what Romney could not do -- unify the Republican base.

What would Romney do without the media? - Right Turn - The Washington Post

The mainstream media — the same that were fixated on condemning Romney for voicing the same criticism as the State Department had over the errant Cairo Embassy’s online apology — decided that Romney was “isolated” or in trouble with Republicans. Perhaps the media don’t know very many conservatives. Or perhaps they thought a few moldy Beltway insiders were representative of the party at large.

...But by day’s end a long list of lawmakers, foreign policy hawks, right-wing talk radio hosts, right-leaning blogs and right-leaning editorial boards had rallied not grudgingly but full-throatedly to Romney’s side.

...And surely the over-the-top obsessive coverage of Romney’s purported gaffe, rather than the security lapse and the other particulars of the event, helped reignite what can only be described as hatred for the mainstream media. When the chips are down, conservatives are certain, fairness and accuracy go out the window.

...the best Republican candidates go through, around and right over the heads of the mainstream media.
 
where would Romney be without the media? 25 points ahead of Obama.
 
where would Romney be without the media?...

most likely, he's be an unofficial adviser to President McCain.
 
The media does what Romney could not do -- unify the Republican base.


"At times one remains loyal to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid"

- Immanuel Kant
 
where would Romney be without the media?...

most likely, he's be an unofficial adviser to President McCain.

Good point, If McCain had picked Romney for VP, he would be president McCain.
 
where would Romney be without the media? 25 points ahead of Obama.

Exactly...

The media has been all over this guy, reporting EVERYTHING he said out of context and making negatives of everything... highly glorifying every statement by any conservative against him...

Yet, with Obama he is treated with kid gloves... every action he does is heaven sent... Every mistake he makes is someone elses fault... every time someone criticizes him theyre vilified... and when Democrats and/or Blacks speak out against him and suggest they'd vote for Romney theyre challenged heavily on the reasons why, then the story gets burried...

The MSM has not only shown their bias... but they're become an apparatus of the liberals now, where they're trying to dictate public policy...

This is completely disgusting, the treatment this embassy story is getting...

Embassies are being attacked in 17 countries or so... and the president is out doing campaign donation events... Yet, Romney is the one the media outlets are going after? This is the very same behavior they would've been all over GWB about if this was going on during his administration (which at times it did, and they did get all over him)...

The last time I checked, Obama is the one who was charged with the responsibility of protecting those who got killed and who are still in harms way... How about taking the president to task for his gross negligence in his official duty as president (not presidential candidate)?

Is the White House considered vacant?
 
Exactly...

The media has been all over this guy, reporting EVERYTHING he said out of context and making negatives of everything... highly glorifying every statement by any conservative against him...

Yet, with Obama he is treated with kid gloves... every action he does is heaven sent... Every mistake he makes is someone elses fault... every time someone criticizes him theyre vilified... and when Democrats and/or Blacks speak out against him and suggest they'd vote for Romney theyre challenged heavily on the reasons why, then the story gets burried...

The MSM has not only shown their bias... but they're become an apparatus of the liberals now, where they're trying to dictate public policy...

This is completely disgusting, the treatment this embassy story is getting...

Embassies are being attacked in 17 countries or so... and the president is out doing campaign donation events... Yet, Romney is the one the media outlets are going after? This is the very same behavior they would've been all over GWB about if this was going on during his administration (which at times it did, and they did get all over him)...

The last time I checked, Obama is the one who was charged with the responsibility of protecting those who got killed and who are still in harms way... How about taking the president to task for his gross negligence in his official duty as president (not presidential candidate)?

Is the White House considered vacant?

Romney is "attacked" because he screws up. He screwed up with his embassy comments pure and simple.

And to answer the question where Romney would be without the media... an unknown.
 
Romney is "attacked" because he screws up. He screwed up with his embassy comments pure and simple.

And to answer the question where Romney would be without the media... an unknown.

his embassy comments were right on and reflected the views of a majority of americans.

a better statement would be: where would obama be without the media.....an unknown rabble rouser in the ghettos of chicago.
 
his embassy comments were right on and reflected the views of a majority of americans.

Horse****. His statement was factually wrong from start to finish. That the conservatives in the US are trying to spin it into the total opposite, only shows how desperate they are. All experts on foreign policy agree pretty much that what he did was wrong.. including many if not a majority on the right.
 
Romney is "attacked" because he screws up. He screwed up with his embassy comments pure and simple.

And to answer the question where Romney would be without the media... an unknown.

LMFAO @ because he messes up... They're only reported to you as gaffes to make you think he messed up...

If they just reported the stories, without injecting opinion into them (the way many foreign news agencies do) you wouldn't be taking them as gaffes...

He didn't mess up... he's not the president...

The president messed up... and the liberals are looking the other way, justifying his actions, deflecting responsibility by blaming Bush for the problems, etc.

The President, the sitting president, the one who has been skipping intelligence briefings, the one who is charged with the duty of protecting the safety of Americans, the one who picks who the embassadors are, the one who sets foreign policy, the one who decides what sudden military responses will be... That's the person responsible... He's the one who was lax in his duty of protecting the embassies for the 9/11 anniversary, then promised action, then let the situation break out even further by his weak response, and priority focus on the election...
 
LMFAO @ because he messes up... They're only reported to you as gaffes to make you think he messed up...

If they just reported the stories, without injecting opinion into them (the way many foreign news agencies do) you wouldn't be taking them as gaffes...

He didn't mess up... he's not the president...

He wants to be the president and what he did was not presidential at all.. it made him look like a hothead... and one thing we dont need is a hothead with access to the big red nuke button.

The president messed up... and the liberals are looking the other way, justifying his actions, deflecting responsibility by blaming Bush for the problems, etc.

Yes the right keep saying so, but how exactly did he mess up....

The President, the sitting president, the one who has been skipping intelligence briefings,

Yes according to the right, but the very same people had no problems when Bush or Reagan did the same thing... go figure.

the one who is charged with the duty of protecting the safety of Americans, the one who picks who the embassadors are, the one who sets foreign policy, the one who decides what sudden military responses will be... That's the person responsible... He's the one who was lax in his duty of protecting the embassies for the 9/11 anniversary, then promised action, then let the situation break out even further by his weak response, and priority focus on the election...

Were all US embassies and consulates on a heightened state of alert because of 9/11? yes the where.. so how is he "lax in his duty"? Oh you one of those people that actually thinks that every US embassy is Fort Knox with a 10 mile no mans land and defended by a full division of marines right?

It is funny how none of the deadly attacks on US forces in the Iraq occupation was "Bush'es fault", but when there is a black Democrat in the White House, then suddenly it is all his fault even the cluster**** of a mistake the Conservative candidate does.
 
Horse****. His statement was factually wrong from start to finish. That the conservatives in the US are trying to spin it into the total opposite, only shows how desperate they are. All experts on foreign policy agree pretty much that what he did was wrong.. including many if not a majority on the right.

Nope, pete. you are wrong. Romney had as much right as you or I to state his opinion. The state controlled media and its spin is the problem, not Romney
 
Nope, pete. you are wrong. Romney had as much right as you or I to state his opinion. The state controlled media and its spin is the problem, not Romney

:lamo

talk about being in denial....
 
:lamo

talk about being in denial....

media bias has been proven many times, and its not a laughing matter. Its a terrible step towards totalitarianism. Laugh if you wish, but there is a real danger when the media becomes the mouthpiece for one line of political thought.

If you object to what Romney said, thats your right. But don't pretend that you, or some talking head, have any more credence than the rest of us who think what he said was appropriate and correct.
 
He wants to be the president and what he did was not presidential at all.. it made him look like a hothead... and one thing we dont need is a hothead with access to the big red nuke button.

Right... because that's what Mitt Romney said... is that we should nuked everyone that is outside US borders... :roll:

Talk about being a hothead... you just jumped all over Romney for something he didn't say... he never once said the word nukes... Where is PolitFact when you need them... Maybe you should read what Mitt Romney said... and stop jumping to conclusions without all the facts...

(see how ridiculous that kind of reaction is?)

Yes the right keep saying so, but how exactly did he mess up....

His duty is to protect the safety of all Americans, especially abroad... he's established a weak foreign policy disposition which has emboldened our enemies, with the lack of response for numerous attacks... He inadequately prepared security at embassies in the Arab world for the 9/11 anniversary and the controversy over the film which they knew was occuring... Now as a result, people have lost their lives, and attacking US embassies has turned into sport for these people... The Obama administration has been weak, and still lacks a hard consequence that prevents further raids from occuring...


Yes according to the right, but the very same people had no problems when Bush or Reagan did the same thing... go figure.

WTF are you talking about... I don't ever remember Reagan and Bush skipping inteligence briefings to go to campaign fundraisers and neglecting to fully prepare the embassies to deal with expected raids...


Were all US embassies and consulates on a heightened state of alert because of 9/11? yes the where.. so how is he "lax in his duty"? Oh you one of those people that actually thinks that every US embassy is Fort Knox with a 10 mile no mans land and defended by a full division of marines right?

No, but I saw tear gas cannisters fired on American protesters during the conventions, the G6 summit, and other such appearances...

It's funny, real funny, that the Embassy in Egypt, a country in turmoil that had civilian reporters beaten, raped, and killed by unruly mobs (which were applauded in their actions by Obama and Hillary), that then elected leaders from the Muslim Brotherhood, a known active militant Wahabist terrorist organization, and the US Embassy, which is a sizeable property with a large employee base wasn't ready with crowd dispersal tools in the anticipation of violence around the 9/11 anniversary, and then with the film controversy on top of it...

Yet, you think the president was spot on in his duty... He skipped daily briefings and has been more concerned with campainging than the security of Americans abroad

You say they were on alert... but there's "be on alert", and there is adequate staffing and equiping for the situations that might arise. Given that this embassy in Egypt that got infultrated is in a country that just had unruly mobs overthrow its leader, and elect leaders from militant terrorist organizations, why would he think this embassy didn't need riot protection equipment?

All it would've taken is a handful of police with tear gas and rubber bullets, and the crowd would've been dispersed... and a FAST unit could've been there within hours to prevent any future attacks from occuring... Of course, that would require a president who was active and responsive... not a president who was busy fundraising for his campaign...

You got Biden goin around bragging that they got bin Laden... what's he done since then to ensure that there isn't going to be a future flare-up of large scale terrorism? Instead, he's egging them on to strike... with the weak image, the lack of a serious response to prior attacks, and the braggart statements...

This is Obama's fault... and if you felt that those attacks were Bush's fault, then these are certainly just as much on Obama's shoulders...

It is funny how none of the deadly attacks on US forces in the Iraq occupation was "Bush'es fault", but when there is a black Democrat in the White House, then suddenly it is all his fault even the cluster**** of a mistake the Conservative candidate does.

This is even funnier... that's just the point... the press and every single liberal tore GWB apart when Iraqis would bomb a mosque in Iraq, for not preventing it...

Somehow, Obama is given a pass, for a violent attack on 1 consulate, which resulted in deaths, and the raiding of a US embassy in a known hostile area... that escalted with the lack of a clear response, into a widespread sport of storming us embassies wherever you want to...
 
Back
Top Bottom