• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Democrats Display Russian Warships During Tribute To US Vets

Bronson

Bronson

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
3,195
Reaction score
1,192
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Navy Times Mobile - Russian ships displayed at DNC tribute to vets

091112-dnc1-800.JPG


On the last night of the Democratic National Convention, a retired Navy four-star took the stage to pay tribute to veterans. Behind him, on a giant screen, the image of four hulking warships reinforced his patriotic message.

But there was a big mistake in the stirring backdrop: those are Russian warships.
Click to expand...

Well there goes the new Democrat attempted narrative in regards to Foreign Policy and National Security
 
Dems...so stupid they make my teeth hurt..

I weep for my country...

all that was misisng was Obama with a "mission accomplished" banner on he Russian carrier..Obama has ruined our country which is Obama's "mission"..
 
is it possible that the dems can be any more inept? What a bunch of fools. From showing Russian ships to denying a voice vote, Idiots!
 
Some meeting planner messes up an image isn't the best of reasons to bash an entire party (unless that's how you get your jollies). Nitpicking stupid things just perpetuates the stupidity.
 
That is embarrassing for the Dems, I'm sure.
 
I was in the military for 10 years, and I wouldn't be able to tell you what country those ships are from.

Intent was good.

Execution sucked.

Moving on.
 
Blue_State said:
I was in the military for 10 years, and I wouldn't be able to tell you what country those ships are from.

Intent was good.

Execution sucked.

Moving on.
Click to expand...

Shows incompetence and utter lack of attention to detail.

They could have just googled "US Navy Fleet pictures" and found thousands of pictures to choose from.
 
Blue_State said:
I was in the military for 10 years, and I wouldn't be able to tell you what country those ships are from.

Intent was good.

Execution sucked.

Moving on.
Click to expand...

Well, the Republican Convention was such an unmitigated disaster (Chair - 1, Eastwood - 0) that they're reduced to this. I think the polls show what the American people thought of the two conventions.
 
Wiggen said:
Well, the Republican Convention was such an unmitigated disaster (Chair - 1, Eastwood - 0) that they're reduced to this. I think the polls show what the American people thought of the two conventions.
Click to expand...

:lamo Disaster? DNC wears the blunder crown with the "God/Jerusalem" fiasco.
 
Wiggen said:
Well apparently the public does not agree with you, if the polls are anything to go by.

Oh wait, I forgot. We can't trust the polls because they're all in league with the Democrats.:lamo

Obama gets post-convention bounce in surveys
Click to expand...

I don't trust the poll because the odds are that most never saw it. It was on the news for about 13 hours before they started falling all over themselves because of Clinton's speech.

Just to back to your earlier knock, Clint polled well. Since you're invoking polls.
 
Did you mean Clinton polled well? I agree with you.

And why am I not surpised that you 'don't trust' polls?
 
No, I said Clint...not Clinton. Clint Eastwood polled well following the RNC.

Never said I didn't trust polls but when it comes to blunders during the Conventions, DNC takes the cake. You're the one invoking polls as proof and then mentioned Clint vs Chair. Clint's bit polled well. So are you the one that doesn't trust polls?
 
Wiggen said:
Well, the Republican Convention was such an unmitigated disaster (Chair - 1, Eastwood - 0) that they're reduced to this. I think the polls show what the American people thought of the two conventions.
Click to expand...

Isn't it sad when idiots out number rational people. They make all these (irrelevant) claims in a desperate attempt to mare the image of our president. As if that'll change the fact that employment grew and unemployment fell, while stocks soared. Debt is growing at a reasonable pace, GM is alive, OBL is dead.

Even if those warships were Russian the things listed above doesn't all of a sudden change.
 
Last edited:
Blue_State said:
I was in the military for 10 years, and I wouldn't be able to tell you what country those ships are from.

Intent was good.

Execution sucked.

Moving on.
Click to expand...

Do you suppose that Navy guys would know?
 
AliHajiSheik said:
Some meeting planner messes up an image isn't the best of reasons to bash an entire party (unless that's how you get your jollies). Nitpicking stupid things just perpetuates the stupidity.
Click to expand...

Doubtless, the Marine Corps weeps.
 
Reminds me of when the Chinese used a scene from Top Gun to show off "their new aircraft"
 
Blue_State said:
I was in the military for 10 years, and I wouldn't be able to tell you what country those ships are from.

Intent was good.

Execution sucked.

Moving on.
Click to expand...

That kind of sums up the Obama administration.
 
AliHajiSheik said:
Some meeting planner messes up an image isn't the best of reasons to bash an entire party (unless that's how you get your jollies). Nitpicking stupid things just perpetuates the stupidity.
Click to expand...

Stupid is as stupid does.
Forest Gump
 
AliHajiSheik said:
You sure do put a lot of stack in polls. Do you watch American Idol and stuff?
Click to expand...

Well, lets just say I put more faith in polls than in the unsubstantiated claims of a Far Right internet partisan.
 
Fishstyx said:
No, I said Clint...not Clinton. Clint Eastwood polled well following the RNC.

Never said I didn't trust polls but when it comes to blunders during the Conventions, DNC takes the cake. You're the one invoking polls as proof and then mentioned Clint vs Chair. Clint's bit polled well. So are you the one that doesn't trust polls?
Click to expand...

Yeah, but the chair still won the debate.
 
This issue is a perfect example of bias and partisanship.

Reps do something boneheaded... Dems rail, Reps spin. Dems do something boneheaded... Reps rail, Dems spin.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom