• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Is President Obama a Socialist?

Well, since you are saying government should provide services, and obama says the same thing, I am not sure how you are getting the socialist thing since that is exactly what obama is about.

I never called him a socialist.
 
I never called him a socialist.

So then you are saying that obama is not a socialist, and the line of attack where people call him a socialist and say he is going to make us all socialists is wrong? I just want to get some clarity here.
 
So then you are saying that obama is not a socialist, and the line of attack where people call him a socialist and say he is going to make us all socialists is wrong? I just want to get some clarity here.

I am saying I did not call him a socialist and the burden of proof is on those that call him one.

But that really isn't the issue as this is another straw man argument and I have yet to see anyone say the government should not provide any services as you have asserted.
 
I don't need either so your assumption of my needs and rights is based on what???
 
View attachment 67134170 Socialism...No more need for unions. Webster's dictionary: socialism control of basic means of production, its plain and clear, the socialist Gov't will control, wages etc. Also who will work where they say you do as they say ( or else) therefor unions are dead, finished, caput. Unions will cut their own throats by supporting a socialist controlled demorcratic party

Webster: "Any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods."

That's what socialism is. In no way does the term imply the authoritarian nonsense you're spouting. :2wave:
 
:doh
:shock:
If you really believe this then dear sir i am worried.

The number of debates I've had as to whiter this guy is a Socialist is appalling. At some point people will learn that words have definitions... right? :shock:
 
So then you are saying that obama is not a socialist, and the line of attack where people call him a socialist and say he is going to make us all socialists is wrong? I just want to get some clarity here.

It is. If you want to cite evidence to the contrary, then I welcome you to do so.

Your shctick of saying that nationalization = socialization is interesting as well. Out of context, that part of your argument sounds quite bad. So I'll give you an opportunity to clarify before invalidating your position.
 
Back
Top Bottom