MaggieD
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 43,244
- Reaction score
- 44,664
- Location
- Chicago Area
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Instead of arguing who's the better candidate from many different perspectives, would it make sense to argue who has the better plan going forward? Is it possible to have a discussion strictly on those merits? I'm not sure; but it'd be nice. What I mean by that is that, rather than attacking the other candidate, thoughtfully present what you think your guy is prepared to do to get us out of the mess we're in. I'm thinking here are some our major problems:
IOW, without attacking the other guy, can you articulate what YOUR guy intends to do to solve these problems? Who has the better plan??
- Job Creation to get Americans back to work
- Overspending everywhere
- Tax Revenue -- with even the best of intentions, we need more money
- Immigration -- we've got to address this issue
- Student Loans -- our next horrendous bubble
- Public Pension Funds -- our horrendous bubble after our next one
- Outsourcing -- bringing jobs back home
- Financial Regulation --to make sure our housing collapse never happens again
- Add your own
IOW, without attacking the other guy, can you articulate what YOUR guy intends to do to solve these problems? Who has the better plan??