• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Where will they each lead??

With Obama, it's just regurgitating the 2008 campaign, without the fresh "rock star" image. Blah blah roads and bridges. Blah blah fair share. Blah blah equal opportunity.

With Romney it's Blah blah big government. Blah blah create jobs. Blah blah bring home jobs.

However, Romney has said that he would stop ObamaCare. That's good enough for a lot of people.

On Meet the Press Sunday, Romney said he wouldn't be getting rid of all of the Health Care reform.
Mitt Romney On Obamacare: 'I'm Not Getting Rid Of All Of Health Care Reform' (VIDEO) [UPDATED]
 
Health Care, we now have Obamacare, which was enacted without one republican vote or one republican idea. This alone tells me this is not a good bill for this country. A bill that effects 1/6th of our economy should have full bipartisan support, in fact most all bills should have bipartisan or at least some support from the opposing side. We have to start over with Obamacare, and it has to be a real bill that can be supported by both sides.

I have a few problems with a lot of what you said, but this one I had to say something about. You claim that Obamacare was enacted withoit one republican idea. Most of the AHA was based on republican ideas. The mandate was one of the big republican ideas for many years. Obama got a lot of flack from his base because most of the plan was republican ideas. I don't see why republicans run from their own ideas just because Obama embraces them
 
I think some are slackers just looking for an easy ride; I think some are too disabled to do what they know, and either can't or won't retrain. And, of course, the greater majority are probably truly disabled.

What's a glass maker supposed to do when all the glass plants close? He may or may not have a high school education...glass-making is all he knows. He loses his job to outsourcing at 48 years old. He's scared to freakin' death. He sees some of his friends suddenly develop back injuries, or PTSD due to stress, or whatever the flavor-of-the-day diagnosis is needed to get interviewed for disability.

And, if he can't get it on his own? There are a slough of attorneys standing in the background willing to walk his claim through the system (including sending him to their doctors) for a % of the award. And. If a guy's willing to jump through all the hoops? Mr. Healthy-As-Pie starts getting his disability check.

To deny this is happening on a somewhat regular basis is to deny reality, in my opinion.

I know a lot of people think getting SS diability it easy. It is not. I am currently disabled. I had to wate, without an income or health care, almost three years to get my hearing to be approved for SS disability. During my wate, my condition got worse because I had no medical care. It was a very dark time for me and my family. It has taken me years to over come the useless feeling the process gave me. I was approved by a judge, but most are not approved their first hearing. My attorney's never sent me to a doctor to declare me disabled. I think some people just don't realize how hard it is to get on SS Disability.
 
I know a lot of people think getting SS diability it easy. It is not. I am currently disabled. I had to wate, without an income or health care, almost three years to get my hearing to be approved for SS disability. During my wate, my condition got worse because I had no medical care. It was a very dark time for me and my family. It has taken me years to over come the useless feeling the process gave me. I was approved by a judge, but most are not approved their first hearing. My attorney's never sent me to a doctor to declare me disabled. I think some people just don't realize how hard it is to get on SS Disability.

I'm sorry for your disability -- and for the way the system made you feel as you traveled your way through the maze. I'm sure the system is more difficult, or more lenient, depending upon what area of the country one lives in. It shouldn't be that way, but I think it is.
 
I don't want to derail this thread, but your statement is ludicrous. What did farmers do before illegals? The Amish plow their fields with horses. So you say without illegals, so what we have a secret hole in our fence to let so many illegals in. Then we ask them if they are going to pick our fields, and if they say no we send them back. What is so hard to understand illegal means illegal. So we have a closed border but our agents let so many sneak in to pick lettuce. This is insane. Last only a small percentage of illegals work in the fields. Illegals are in ever fabric of working society. They are cooks, nannies, hotel/motel maids, landscapers, commercial fisherman, truck drivers, carpenters, construction workers of all kinds. I think you get the picture. Illegals have replaced millions of American working families all across this country, and you say let them in. I don't think so

I don't want one, and I mean not one person enter this country illegally. Period..... We have legal immigration laws, and it's those laws that need to be fully enforced. Now their is always ways to amend current law, like work permits and the like. But it has to be done legally.

I have only one point to make here. If we expect Americans to take these jobs, then farmers must pay more. When farmers have to pay more, food prices go up. I am all for finding a way to get the unemployed busy working on farms instead of illegals, but we have to face reality here. Do you have any ideas how we can make this transition and still be able to deal with the increase in food prices due to the increased expense it will take farmers to get their crops in.
 
This belongs in the rant section. I would sure like to take the time to fully debunk your post, but I'm not going to waste my time.
What a waste of a post.
One of us puts up partisan hackery and gets and gives all his few 'lkes' from and to the Right, and the other a financial professional (with 10x your post count in economics section) and with progressive but fairly independent/objective and two-sided views (ie, Balanced Budget, stopping illegal immigration - compare our solutions, agreeing on slashing spending, Ron Paul, Kyle Bass, ZIRP, etc). The fact is you Can't "debunk" anything.
 
Last edited:
I have only one point to make here. If we expect Americans to take these jobs, then farmers must pay more. When farmers have to pay more, food prices go up. I am all for finding a way to get the unemployed busy working on farms instead of illegals, but we have to face reality here. Do you have any ideas how we can make this transition and still be able to deal with the increase in food prices due to the increased expense it will take farmers to get their crops in.

Well, that right there is another problem with illegal alien workers - they drive EVERYONE's wages down. Legal migrant workers must be paid at least the federal minimum wage. Still, not a lot here, but since they are only here for the season according to their visas, that money represents far more when they return home.

When I was a young man, many of my classmates would go to Alaska and work the tuna boats for the summer. The pay wasn't all that good in Alaska standards (cost of living was always high), but they'd come home with serious coin after the summer - if they didn't spend it on Alaskan 'entertainment' <grin>.

We let our farm situation go so far off the rails that now several elements need changing simultaneously. The larger food corps consolidated farms and this put them in a situation where they could pay the minimum wage no problem, but this also put the independents at a competitive disadvantage, so they hire illegals to be able to compete. That has to change.
 
First of all thanks for this thread Maggie. Even if the details are vague (nonexistent anyone?) on each side at least we can talk about specific perceptions we have, which in itself might reveal something better.

*Sdenote* I realized when I started this that it basically just turned into a huge rant of my own thoughts and perceptions. I then realized the reason for this is beacuse I don't trust either politician to even follow through with what they said they were going to do (if they even ever get down to specifics). So sorry this is kinda off topic but...there's no way for it to honestly be on topic with the tone of how things are without hyperbole. You can pass on reading my post if this isn't what you wanted to read.

[*]Job Creation to get Americans back to work

I believe we spoke breifly about this in a separate thread, it will be difficult to actually bring manufacturing jobs back to America how things are.

People are no longer trained for current technologically advanced manufacturing jobs. I hear reports weekly on NPR about positions in plants remaining open for long periods of time because people just aren't trained for them like they once were.
I believe to step forward we need to be a technological based economy, supplying advancements for other countries and then either training them or selling maintenance ourselves. I have no idea how we can do this but damn I love it. Like I said in the other thread I believe this to be an idea I heard from David Brooks.

[*]Overspending everywhere

Definitely an issue, but unfortunately we do need to spend right now. I definitely see the debt as an issue but...I've heard from MANY economists on both sides say that if we stop spending to enhance the economy we will fall back down, and it will be hard, possibly harder than the first fall because we definitely haven't recovered yet. I think this is an issue of currently working on spending more efficiently and working on a plan that would minimize the deficit later and then eventually lead to paying down the debt. We can't just assume it will pay itself off later, if we don't make plans now we're going to be hurting later.

[*]Tax Revenue -- with even the best of intentions, we need more money

We do need more money, but any money we apply towards the deficit right now will be directly taken out of the economy (unless we feel like reaching into bank accounts and seizing money that's not stimulating the economy (just to confirm, not a good idea if you believe in freedom)). The lower classes are mainly scraping by right now, taxing them more would take food out of people's months. I heard a report that 1 out of 9 families that consideres themselvse middle-class had at least one individual that couldn't get enough food this past year. This was either due to availability and/or funds available. This is a huge deal imo.

On the other hand you can't just tax the rich and expect everything to work out honkey dorey. We need to get our economy back in full swing one way or another to be able to get the funds needed to minimize the deficit. Everything can be solved separate ways but everything directly links back to the economy, usually in more than 1 unique way.

The honest way to do this is to minimize deductions and loopholes for everyone (which would be a larger burden for the rich) but then lower the overall rates. Our government talks about this every year but no one can actually get down to doing it. THIS HAS TO BE DONE otherwise this problem will only get worse.

[*]Immigration -- we've got to address this issue

To be honest, I have absolutely no idea how to solve this issue. It's incredibly complex and no answer I've heard seems to be the correct one. "Get rid of everyone." isn't going to work and is just going to end up costing more money in the long run and "Let everyone stay" is currently having major issues in different sectors. I honestly don't know...

[*]Student Loans -- our next horrendous bubble

This is another difficult one I don't have the answer to - probably because I don't have all of the information, there's still a ton of grey area for me. What I do know is getting the economy back up and running with help alleviate some of the pressure here but it still needs to be dealt with. I keep hearing reports on how tuition fees are increasing at a much higher rate than inflation. I think we need to address the issue of increased cost and how to minimize it. An uneducated public leads to much worse things than bad policies, it leads quite literally to the distruction of a society.

[*]Public Pension Funds -- our horrendous bubble after our next one

This is mainly a state issue, not a federal issue.

That being said, people need to learn (be taught?) how to plan for their retirement at an early age. This is similar to credit card knowledge but..100x worse?

[*]Outsourcing -- bringing jobs back home

Read above *Job Creation to get Americans back to work* - this isn't going to stop, it's a global economy and we need to figure out how to lead in a sustainable way.

[*]Financial Regulation --to make sure our housing collapse never happens again

I find this to be a tough topic to debate. Clinton signed *with broad bipartisan support* the laxing of the federal financial regulations that lead to the Citi merge which also lead to the initial economical downturn with the toxic loan assets. (please let me know if I'm wrong here, I know there were many factors in different areas, including this area of the economy (AIG)). The way regulations are implemented now - Our government adds a regulation, the regulation sits there until we decide we want it to do something else and then add an appendage to it. In a few cycles of this later the original regulation has 15 separate moving parts that usually contradict eachother and slows the process down. (not explained perfectly but meh I'm working today).

This needs to eventually be solved like the tax issues - revamp the system and start fresh with efficient regulations doing a simple and beneficial task of protecting everyone. This is an issue that truly falls in the middle for me - the left likes regulations but the right is correct that the system we currently have is horrible.

[*]Add your own

Two party system. I touched on it before but this is going to be my main rant here. This is going to include some backstory so please forgive.

The hate and hyperbole has really gone over the edge recently. To be honest I actually considered myself a democrat even as recent as last year. I took a look around at my feelings as why I disagreed with the right on some issues and came to the conclusion "sports teams." That's the only thing that made sense. My team is good, and I'm not a bad person, so therefore the other side must be misguided (never ever believe the right to be bad people). I made a concious effort to take myself out of the "team mentality" to find the true beliefs with absolutely no label. This takes time and I'm still struggling with it a bit but oh god has it ever opened my eyes. The angr directing the other way needs to stop. If we keep migrating towards the anger, this is only going to get worse (See elected officials yelling at the president in the middle of his speach).

The politicians follow our lead. Yes they perpetuate all the stereotypes but that's because we 1) act that way ourselves and 2) Basically tell them to do it with our votes and our rhetoric. Both sides honestly aren't that far apart in goals. Everyone wants to see america succeed, we just have the "hot button issues" crammed down our throats day after day because honestly the politicians need us to hate eachother for them to stay in power beacuse "our side isn't the bad one."

I'm probably a little too heated about this right now to give a full display of my perception but I hope it at least sparks some discussion.
 
Last edited:
Well, that right there is another problem with illegal alien workers - they drive EVERYONE's wages down. Legal migrant workers must be paid at least the federal minimum wage. Still, not a lot here, but since they are only here for the season according to their visas, that money represents far more when they return home.

When I was a young man, many of my classmates would go to Alaska and work the tuna boats for the summer. The pay wasn't all that good in Alaska standards (cost of living was always high), but they'd come home with serious coin after the summer - if they didn't spend it on Alaskan 'entertainment' <grin>.

We let our farm situation go so far off the rails that now several elements need changing simultaneously. The larger food corps consolidated farms and this put them in a situation where they could pay the minimum wage no problem, but this also put the independents at a competitive disadvantage, so they hire illegals to be able to compete. That has to change.

They don't drive down everyones ages. We have a minimum wage. Also, thye basically do the work that most Americans would never do.
 
I don't want to derail this thread, but your statement is ludicrous. What did farmers do before illegals? The Amish plow their fields with horses. So you say without illegals, so what we have a secret hole in our fence to let so many illegals in. Then we ask them if they are going to pick our fields, and if they say no we send them back. What is so hard to understand illegal means illegal. So we have a closed border but our agents let so many sneak in to pick lettuce. This is insane. Last only a small percentage of illegals work in the fields. Illegals are in ever fabric of working society. They are cooks, nannies, hotel/motel maids, landscapers, commercial fisherman, truck drivers, carpenters, construction workers of all kinds. I think you get the picture. Illegals have replaced millions of American working families all across this country, and you say let them in. I don't think so

I don't want one, and I mean not one person enter this country illegally. Period..... We have legal immigration laws, and it's those laws that need to be fully enforced. Now their is always ways to amend current law, like work permits and the like. But it has to be done legally.

You have a lot of friends who are willing to pack up the family and follow the crops?
 
Instead of arguing who's the better candidate from many different perspectives, would it make sense to argue who has the better plan going forward? Is it possible to have a discussion strictly on those merits? I'm not sure; but it'd be nice. What I mean by that is that, rather than attacking the other candidate, thoughtfully present what you think your guy is prepared to do to get us out of the mess we're in. I'm thinking here are some our major problems:


  • Job Creation to get Americans back to work
  • Overspending everywhere
  • Tax Revenue -- with even the best of intentions, we need more money
  • Immigration -- we've got to address this issue
  • Student Loans -- our next horrendous bubble
  • Public Pension Funds -- our horrendous bubble after our next one
  • Outsourcing -- bringing jobs back home
  • Financial Regulation --to make sure our housing collapse never happens again
  • Add your own

IOW, without attacking the other guy, can you articulate what YOUR guy intends to do to solve these problems? Who has the better plan??


Immigration... dole out work visas with super simplicity. Tax non-citizen workers at a much higher rate than citizen workers. Therefore there is money to come and work here but there is still an incentive to get citizenship legally all while we create extra revenue off of those not here as citizens.
 
Instead of arguing who's the better candidate from many different perspectives, would it make sense to argue who has the better plan going forward? Is it possible to have a discussion strictly on those merits? I'm not sure; but it'd be nice. What I mean by that is that, rather than attacking the other candidate, thoughtfully present what you think your guy is prepared to do to get us out of the mess we're in. I'm thinking here are some our major problems:


  • Job Creation to get Americans back to work
  • Overspending everywhere
  • Tax Revenue -- with even the best of intentions, we need more money
  • Immigration -- we've got to address this issue
  • Student Loans -- our next horrendous bubble
  • Public Pension Funds -- our horrendous bubble after our next one
  • Outsourcing -- bringing jobs back home
  • Financial Regulation --to make sure our housing collapse never happens again
  • Add your own

IOW, without attacking the other guy, can you articulate what YOUR guy intends to do to solve these problems? Who has the better plan??

Overspending...

Bring the foreign military bases home. Seeing how military spending doesn't ever look like it will get cut, make sure the spending goes within our borders and it goes right back into our economy rather than another country's economy.
 
Instead of arguing who's the better candidate from many different perspectives, would it make sense to argue who has the better plan going forward? Is it possible to have a discussion strictly on those merits? I'm not sure; but it'd be nice. What I mean by that is that, rather than attacking the other candidate, thoughtfully present what you think your guy is prepared to do to get us out of the mess we're in. I'm thinking here are some our major problems:


  • Job Creation to get Americans back to work
  • Overspending everywhere
  • Tax Revenue -- with even the best of intentions, we need more money
  • Immigration -- we've got to address this issue
  • Student Loans -- our next horrendous bubble
  • Public Pension Funds -- our horrendous bubble after our next one
  • Outsourcing -- bringing jobs back home
  • Financial Regulation --to make sure our housing collapse never happens again
  • Add your own

IOW, without attacking the other guy, can you articulate what YOUR guy intends to do to solve these problems? Who has the better plan??


Financial regulation...

- Reinstitute Glass Steagal and make the checking and savings banks where they can't gamble our money on Wall Street. You are either a savings bank OR an investment bank. You can't be both.

- Completely federalize the federal reserve. Put it under the purview of the congress and the Secretary of the Treasury so that any Freedom of Information Act can reveal wtf goes on in that central bank, because now it seems that they protect themselves from attacks by claiming their quasi government side then hide all their shenanigans from public view by claiming that it happened under their quasi private side. If it's federalized, it will be audited regularly. Put a freegin' libertarian in as secretary of the treasury to watch their ass.

- institute a transaction fee for wall street trade. $5 per purchase... $5 per sale. Mucho revenue and not at an unaffordable price.
 
Last edited:
Instead of arguing who's the better candidate from many different perspectives, would it make sense to argue who has the better plan going forward? Is it possible to have a discussion strictly on those merits? I'm not sure; but it'd be nice. What I mean by that is that, rather than attacking the other candidate, thoughtfully present what you think your guy is prepared to do to get us out of the mess we're in. I'm thinking here are some our major problems:


  • Job Creation to get Americans back to work
  • Overspending everywhere
  • Tax Revenue -- with even the best of intentions, we need more money
  • Immigration -- we've got to address this issue
  • Student Loans -- our next horrendous bubble
  • Public Pension Funds -- our horrendous bubble after our next one
  • Outsourcing -- bringing jobs back home
  • Financial Regulation --to make sure our housing collapse never happens again
  • Add your own

IOW, without attacking the other guy, can you articulate what YOUR guy intends to do to solve these problems? Who has the better plan??

To your list I'd add Medicaid for all, including drugs. Medicare for all paid for with a payroll deduction as it is now.

Then institute an 800 number fraud line for anyone to call in and report medicare fraud to which the caller will earn X% of the monies recouped by the government all while the perp(s) goes to jail.

Along with fraud reporting line and the burden of healthcare costs being removed from business' their savings would open their profit margins along with the fact that the VAST majority of bankruptcies are declared as a result of medical expenses... THAT would happen no more and save the government that money.

We'd have a healthier work force and a healthier and more competitive market.


Sorry about not talking about politicians, I'm just giving my platforms for my presidency.
 
Back
Top Bottom