• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Obama's Stadium Speech Moved. Democrats Pretend It's The Weather

avusbluem5 said:
LOL, it's Ironic... These "weather" attacks coming from the Party that canceled an entire day of their convention for a storm that didn't come within 300 miles of their COVERED convention hall. I wonder if they were worried nobody was gonna show up on Tuesday? Hmmmmm....

For those still in doubt... It rained on Thursday in Charlotte. Republicans panicked and were off by over 300 miles. Just shows their desperation, attacking the DNC about the weather forecast, as if weather forecasters can predict exactly when and where a Thunderstorm is gonna pop up. LOL... Keep digging morons..

Delegates run for shelter in a downpour as they arrive at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., on Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)
slide_249039_1483081_free.jpg


Delegates run for shelter in a downpour as they arrive at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., on Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)
slide_249039_1483075_free.jpg


Protesters seek shelter from a pouring rain at Marshall Park in Charlotte, N.C., Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012 during the Democratic National Convention. President Obama's speech was moved from Bank of America Stadium to the indoor Time Warner Cable Arena due to weather concerns. (AP Photo/Gerry Broome)
slide_249039_1483072_free.jpg


A delegates runs for shelter in a downpour as they arrive at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., on Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012. (AP Photo/David Goldman)
slide_249039_1483068_free.jpg


Delegates run for shelter in a downpour as they arrive at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., on Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012. (AP Photo/David Goldman)
slide_249039_1483063_free.jpg
Click to expand...

b-b-b-but look up at the sky. There is a small patch of blue up there somewhere. LMAO.
 
winston53660 said:
Wow you really think you got something here:roll:

It didn't rain....whoop tee doo
Click to expand...

You sure could have used those optics of 65K fools cheering Obozo's speech that was universally panned last night

0% chance of rain was forecast in plenty of time, guess they knew they couldn't even fill it halfway.

You have to fool yourself in order to maintain faith in your false prophet but we all know why Obama really moved that venue. As the commentators are saying, "He's out of juice".
 
Bronson said:
You sure could have used those optics of 65K fools cheering Obozo's speech that was universally panned last night

0% chance of rain was forecast in plenty of time, guess they knew they couldn't even fill it halfway.

You have to fool yourself in order to maintain faith in your false prophet but we all know why Obama really moved that venue. As the commentators are saying, "He's out of juice".
Click to expand...

See Winston? Bronson entirely avoids actually dealing with rebuttals. He essentially made up what he thinks you wrote and responds to that. Notice the many posts dealing with the logistics, liability and reasonableness of it all. Did Bronson address any of that? No. He doesn't. Ever. Bronson is what we call a "soapboxer." He's not here to actually discuss and exchange ideas. He's here to yell his belifs the loudest and are the rightest and ignores everything that contradicts him.
 
obvious Child said:
See Winston? Bronson entirely avoids actually dealing with rebuttals. He essentially made up what he thinks you wrote and responds to that. Notice the many posts dealing with the logistics, liability and reasonableness of it all. Did Bronson address any of that? No. He doesn't. Ever. Bronson is what we call a "soapboxer." He's not here to actually discuss and exchange ideas. He's here to yell his belifs the loudest and are the rightest and ignores everything that contradicts him.
Click to expand...

Did it rain in the stadium on Thursday night? They could not fill it, they did not want the media to show empty seats. Thats all there was to it.
 
obvious Child said:
See Winston? Bronson entirely avoids actually dealing with rebuttals. He essentially made up what he thinks you wrote and responds to that. Notice the many posts dealing with the logistics, liability and reasonableness of it all. Did Bronson address any of that? No. He doesn't. Ever. Bronson is what we call a "soapboxer." He's not here to actually discuss and exchange ideas. He's here to yell his belifs the loudest and are the rightest and ignores everything that contradicts him.
Click to expand...

Where did I avoid "dealing with the rebuttal"?

There wasn't a drop of rain during his entire speech and they knew there was a 0% chance of rain LONG before Obama gave that speech. 10PM EST it was 0%. Hell, the initial warning was only 30%. Not enough to cancel a Sunday Picnic.

It's simple. They couldn't fill the stadium. Not even close. You want to pretend it's the weather. It's not my problem you've been brainwashed into a cult.
 
Bobcat said:
Did it rain in the stadium on Thursday night? They could not fill it, they did not want the media to show empty seats. Thats all there was to it.
Click to expand...

Where did I avoid "dealing with the rebuttal"?

There wasn't a drop of rain during his entire speech and they knew there was a 0% chance of rain LONG before Obama gave that speech. 10PM EST it was 0%. Hell, the initial warning was only 30%. Not enough to cancel a Sunday Picnic.

It's simple. They couldn't fill the stadium. Not even close. You want to pretend it's the weather. It's not my problem you've been brainwashed into a cult.
Click to expand...

And these posts further shows how certain users will effectively ignore logistics, safety, liability and political damage from such liability to score points.

If the Republicans did this and it didn't rain, they'd be all over how the GOP was being responsible for audience safety by having foresight. But here, they refuse to do that.
 
obvious Child said:
And these posts further shows how certain users will effectively ignore logistics, safety, liability and political damage from such liability to score points.

If the Republicans did this and it didn't rain, they'd be all over how the GOP was being responsible for audience safety by having foresight. But here, they refuse to do that.
Click to expand...

It had nothing to do with safety or liability, it did have everything to do with political damage. Good to see that you finally realized that
 
Bobcat said:
It had nothing to do with safety or liability, it did have everything to do with political damage. Good to see that you finally realized that
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter he's been brainwashed

Obama says "safety" and his eyes cloud over. The odds of getting struck by lighting in that stadium were millions upon millions to 1. Zero rain during the speech. They knew this. They didn't have any such back up plan in CO in case in rained in 2008. ect ect ect they KNEW they couldn't fill the stadium so they scrambled. There is no way in hell the DNC would have allowed the optics of 65K screaming Obamabots live during a speech not happen unless they couldn't make it happen. There wasn't a 100% chance of rain during Obama's speech time. There was 0% chance and 30% chance for the entire day. Their excuses are pathetic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom