• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

What is Governor Romney's plan?

iacardsfan

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 17, 2011
Messages
1,981
Reaction score
806
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Libertarian
I have watched the Convention, I have read about him but I have yet to hear anything of his plan. I have heard how Obama has an awful record and we need a change from that, how he has not lived up to what he promised and we need to change that. Him and his campaign always talk about "real change" but I have not seen anything to support any change then what we already have. He always states things about bringing jobs back home, reminds people how many people don't have jobs, but never says how he will create jobs and how he will lower unemployment. This is not picking/hating on Romney, I truly want to know what he has planned, because when it comes down to it, if both candidates have essentially the same plan for "Change" then what is the point in voting for Romney?
 
I have watched the Convention, I have read about him but I have yet to hear anything of his plan. I have heard how Obama has an awful record and we need a change from that, how he has not lived up to what he promised and we need to change that. Him and his campaign always talk about "real change" but I have not seen anything to support any change then what we already have. He always states things about bringing jobs back home, reminds people how many people don't have jobs, but never says how he will create jobs and how he will lower unemployment. This is not picking/hating on Romney, I truly want to know what he has planned, because when it comes down to it, if both candidates have essentially the same plan for "Change" then what is the point in voting for Romney?

He does not have a plan because he doesn't know how to grow the economy. He only knows how to grow his wallet. That is his claim to fame.
 
I would love it is a presidential candidate said that his plan was to execute the laws enacted by the legislature. I think I'd fall off my chair.
 
I would love it is a presidential candidate said that his plan was to execute the laws enacted by the legislature. I think I'd fall off my chair.

You mean a candidate who actually understands the Constitutional limits on the power of the president and acknowledges them? Someone who doesn't promise the sky, moon, and stars?

Such a candidate could never get elected.
 
I have watched the Convention, I have read about him but I have yet to hear anything of his plan. I have heard how Obama has an awful record and we need a change from that, how he has not lived up to what he promised and we need to change that. Him and his campaign always talk about "real change" but I have not seen anything to support any change then what we already have. He always states things about bringing jobs back home, reminds people how many people don't have jobs, but never says how he will create jobs and how he will lower unemployment. This is not picking/hating on Romney, I truly want to know what he has planned, because when it comes down to it, if both candidates have essentially the same plan for "Change" then what is the point in voting for Romney?


Well. This is what I did. I took your thread title, I put it into Google.

First link.

Jobs and Economic Growth | Mitt Romney for President
 
You mean a candidate who actually understands the Constitutional limits on the power of the president and acknowledges them? Someone who doesn't promise the sky, moon, and stars?

Such a candidate could never get elected.

I'm sure you're right. It seems the people want an emperor instead of a president, which is fitting, since our little union of sovereign states has transmogrified into a empire, run out of Mordor on the Potomac.
 
People don't vote for plans, so why put one out?
 
I have watched the Convention, I have read about him but I have yet to hear anything of his plan. I have heard how Obama has an awful record and we need a change from that, how he has not lived up to what he promised and we need to change that. Him and his campaign always talk about "real change" but I have not seen anything to support any change then what we already have. He always states things about bringing jobs back home, reminds people how many people don't have jobs, but never says how he will create jobs and how he will lower unemployment. This is not picking/hating on Romney, I truly want to know what he has planned, because when it comes down to it, if both candidates have essentially the same plan for "Change" then what is the point in voting for Romney?

He is planning to lower HIS taxes, 13% is way too much for him. That and another recession is about it.
 
I think a lot of our economic troubles have come from people giving a flying **** what the president wants and thinks. When it come sot government-decisions and such: it should be given much less heft and influence.

It's NOT the presidents PLACE. He/she should single handedly try to do anything of the sort.

"Get back in your place, bitch" <- final word - it would behoove the president greatly to listen to my noble advice.
 
Chris Matthews is that you?
Wow, that's one of the most racist things I've heard in quite some time.

It's not cool to use racist codewords like "is" and "you".
 
Well. This is what I did. I took your thread title, I put it into Google.

First link.

Jobs and Economic Growth | Mitt Romney for President

Well, let's look at that, then.

Taxes: Substantially lower taxes for rich people and corporations, plus a little bit for everyone else.

Regulations: Repeal everything done since 2009. Lessen environmental regulations. Remove funding from regulatory agencies and remove liability from those who violate regulations.

Trade: Make it easier to do business in other countries. Create token digs against China while continuing to do all of our manufacturing there.

Labor: Weaken unions so that that laborers can...? Be paid less? Be fired more easily? Oh, but he's going to make sure that unions can't spend their dues on political advertising.

Human Capital: As if the term itself wasn't kind of insulting... Retraining programs to help people qualify for new jobs when they lose their old ones. Hey, this one sounds good. Not that there's any details, but it's a start. Make it easier for talented foreigners to stay in the country. I agree with this one, too. It just seems contradictory to the America-centric view that Republicans tend to espouse.

Spending: Um... A whole lot of conditional cuts to spending, based on the economy already recovering. But also un-cutting the military budget. And making sure that no more military cuts can happen, while simultaneously making other cuts to unspecified locations. But then, specifics! Repeal Obamacare! Privatize Amtrak. Who cares how many people rely on it, all that matters is if it makes a profit. Screw the arts, Planned Parenthood, and foreign aid. That last one might be okay, but all of his dollar amounts are unsubstantiated guesses with little basis in reality.

Then, addressing block grants to states. Make sure they don't have to spend those grants on retraining (which he was in favor of a little earlier, but now wants to cut), and Medicaid.

Reduce waste and fraud. Sure, sounds good. But waste is somewhat subjective. No specifics? What a shame. Salary cuts for federal employees. So, more middle class people will make less money. How does that help? Plus fire 10% of them. Aren't we in an unemployment crisis? How does firing people help?

So, there's Romney's policies. Most of them won't actually help. More welfare for the rich and corporations. More shipping jobs overseas. Weakening unions so that workers can be paid less. More military spending, but less spending on healthcare and education. And then pay federal employees less and fire a bunch of them. How is any of this going to put more people in jobs that pay enough to keep them in the middle class? How is any of this going to actually reduce our debt? How are fewer middle class people earning incomes and paying taxes, and less tax revenue from the wealthy and corporations making all the profit from that middle class work going to raise us any more revenue to pay it off? Especially if we're really not going to be spending any less because we'll put the money we're saving by not keeping people healthy and educated and put it into the military instead.

Most of these are vague and nonspecific, and most are nothing more than Fox News talking points. His numbers are made up, and other than the two big ones "Repeal Obamacare - $95 billion", and "Empower States to Innovte - >$100 billion", the rest add up to about another billion. We have SIXTEEN TRILLION to pay off. Even if Romney's nonsensical numbers add up, his plan only saves around 200 billion. The rest of his savings come from reducing "waste and fraud" (yay, specifics!) and paying federal employees less and firing a bunch of them so we can pay them nothing. So we save money by having more people be unemployed, and thus paying no income tax? I don't understand that one. Supposedly we save 58 billion by firing people and making them take pay cuts. So our total is a little bit above 300 billion. Out of sixteen trillion. With substantially lower revenues and more military spending. Sounds like we'll be lucky if we break even.

So in total, Romney also wants to lay off workers, spend more on the military, and further reduce revenue by substantially cutting the taxes on the rich. So a lot of that 300 billion is just going to disappear with lowered revenues, going to buy more state of the art airplanes that we won't use, or go into the pockets of the upper class. So we won't actually get any money set aside to pay off debt.

Yeah, some plan.
 
Wow, that's one of the most racist things I've heard in quite some time.

It's not cool to use racist codewords like "is" and "you".


:rofl Isn't it ridiculous how far down the **** hole libs have taken us?
 
Well, let's look at that, then.

Taxes: Substantially lower taxes for rich people and corporations, plus a little bit for everyone else.

Regulations: Repeal everything done since 2009. Lessen environmental regulations. Remove funding from regulatory agencies and remove liability from those who violate regulations.

Trade: Make it easier to do business in other countries. Create token digs against China while continuing to do all of our manufacturing there.

Labor: Weaken unions so that that laborers can...? Be paid less? Be fired more easily? Oh, but he's going to make sure that unions can't spend their dues on political advertising.

Human Capital: As if the term itself wasn't kind of insulting... Retraining programs to help people qualify for new jobs when they lose their old ones. Hey, this one sounds good. Not that there's any details, but it's a start. Make it easier for talented foreigners to stay in the country. I agree with this one, too. It just seems contradictory to the America-centric view that Republicans tend to espouse.

Spending: Um... A whole lot of conditional cuts to spending, based on the economy already recovering. But also un-cutting the military budget. And making sure that no more military cuts can happen, while simultaneously making other cuts to unspecified locations. But then, specifics! Repeal Obamacare! Privatize Amtrak. Who cares how many people rely on it, all that matters is if it makes a profit. Screw the arts, Planned Parenthood, and foreign aid. That last one might be okay, but all of his dollar amounts are unsubstantiated guesses with little basis in reality.

Then, addressing block grants to states. Make sure they don't have to spend those grants on retraining (which he was in favor of a little earlier, but now wants to cut), and Medicaid.

Reduce waste and fraud. Sure, sounds good. But waste is somewhat subjective. No specifics? What a shame. Salary cuts for federal employees. So, more middle class people will make less money. How does that help? Plus fire 10% of them. Aren't we in an unemployment crisis? How does firing people help?

So, there's Romney's policies. Most of them won't actually help. More welfare for the rich and corporations. More shipping jobs overseas. Weakening unions so that workers can be paid less. More military spending, but less spending on healthcare and education. And then pay federal employees less and fire a bunch of them. How is any of this going to put more people in jobs that pay enough to keep them in the middle class? How is any of this going to actually reduce our debt? How are fewer middle class people earning incomes and paying taxes, and less tax revenue from the wealthy and corporations making all the profit from that middle class work going to raise us any more revenue to pay it off? Especially if we're really not going to be spending any less because we'll put the money we're saving by not keeping people healthy and educated and put it into the military instead.

Most of these are vague and nonspecific, and most are nothing more than Fox News talking points. His numbers are made up, and other than the two big ones "Repeal Obamacare - $95 billion", and "Empower States to Innovte - >$100 billion", the rest add up to about another billion. We have SIXTEEN TRILLION to pay off. Even if Romney's nonsensical numbers add up, his plan only saves around 200 billion. The rest of his savings come from reducing "waste and fraud" (yay, specifics!) and paying federal employees less and firing a bunch of them so we can pay them nothing. So we save money by having more people be unemployed, and thus paying no income tax? I don't understand that one. Supposedly we save 58 billion by firing people and making them take pay cuts. So our total is a little bit above 300 billion. Out of sixteen trillion. With substantially lower revenues and more military spending. Sounds like we'll be lucky if we break even.

So in total, Romney also wants to lay off workers, spend more on the military, and further reduce revenue by substantially cutting the taxes on the rich. So a lot of that 300 billion is just going to disappear with lowered revenues, going to buy more state of the art airplanes that we won't use, or go into the pockets of the upper class. So we won't actually get any money set aside to pay off debt.

Yeah, some plan.


Sorry to be obviously the first to fill you in, but intentional misrepresentation is a hallmark of Socialist propaganda. Your plan for the past 4 years has failed. Live with it. America doesn't want your agenda, but I suspect that Cuba has some slots open....Have fun.
 
:rofl Isn't it ridiculous how far down the **** hole libs have taken us?
It's Twilight Zone territory- duh nah nuh nuh... duh nah nuh nuh...
 
:rofl Isn't it ridiculous how far down the **** hole libs have taken us?

Oh yes - when Obama took office our national debt was at a whopping $00.00 And now look! That bastard.
 
Oh yes - when Obama took office our national debt was at a whopping $00.00 And now look! That bastard.

Nope, that is a huge leap, no one said that Spike. Look, Obama on the trail in '08 called Bush unpatriotic for amassing some 5 trillion in debt in 8 years, so what does that make him for amassing 5 trillion in 3?
 
I have watched the Convention, I have read about him but I have yet to hear anything of his plan. I have heard how Obama has an awful record and we need a change from that, how he has not lived up to what he promised and we need to change that. Him and his campaign always talk about "real change" but I have not seen anything to support any change then what we already have. He always states things about bringing jobs back home, reminds people how many people don't have jobs, but never says how he will create jobs and how he will lower unemployment. This is not picking/hating on Romney, I truly want to know what he has planned, because when it comes down to it, if both candidates have essentially the same plan for "Change" then what is the point in voting for Romney?

the plan is to cut taxes further, and to hope that trickle down finally delivers for the American middle class.

TPC Tax Topics | romney-plan

additionally,

charlie-brown-lucy-football.jpg
 
Well, let's look at that, then.

Taxes: Substantially lower taxes for rich people and corporations, plus a little bit for everyone else.

Regulations: Repeal everything done since 2009. Lessen environmental regulations. Remove funding from regulatory agencies and remove liability from those who violate regulations.

Trade: Make it easier to do business in other countries. Create token digs against China while continuing to do all of our manufacturing there.

Labor: Weaken unions so that that laborers can...? Be paid less? Be fired more easily? Oh, but he's going to make sure that unions can't spend their dues on political advertising.

Human Capital: As if the term itself wasn't kind of insulting... Retraining programs to help people qualify for new jobs when they lose their old ones. Hey, this one sounds good. Not that there's any details, but it's a start. Make it easier for talented foreigners to stay in the country. I agree with this one, too. It just seems contradictory to the America-centric view that Republicans tend to espouse.

Spending: Um... A whole lot of conditional cuts to spending, based on the economy already recovering. But also un-cutting the military budget. And making sure that no more military cuts can happen, while simultaneously making other cuts to unspecified locations. But then, specifics! Repeal Obamacare! Privatize Amtrak. Who cares how many people rely on it, all that matters is if it makes a profit. Screw the arts, Planned Parenthood, and foreign aid. That last one might be okay, but all of his dollar amounts are unsubstantiated guesses with little basis in reality.

Then, addressing block grants to states. Make sure they don't have to spend those grants on retraining (which he was in favor of a little earlier, but now wants to cut), and Medicaid.

Reduce waste and fraud. Sure, sounds good. But waste is somewhat subjective. No specifics? What a shame. Salary cuts for federal employees. So, more middle class people will make less money. How does that help? Plus fire 10% of them. Aren't we in an unemployment crisis? How does firing people help?

So, there's Romney's policies. Most of them won't actually help. More welfare for the rich and corporations. More shipping jobs overseas. Weakening unions so that workers can be paid less. More military spending, but less spending on healthcare and education. And then pay federal employees less and fire a bunch of them. How is any of this going to put more people in jobs that pay enough to keep them in the middle class? How is any of this going to actually reduce our debt? How are fewer middle class people earning incomes and paying taxes, and less tax revenue from the wealthy and corporations making all the profit from that middle class work going to raise us any more revenue to pay it off? Especially if we're really not going to be spending any less because we'll put the money we're saving by not keeping people healthy and educated and put it into the military instead.

Most of these are vague and nonspecific, and most are nothing more than Fox News talking points. His numbers are made up, and other than the two big ones "Repeal Obamacare - $95 billion", and "Empower States to Innovte - >$100 billion", the rest add up to about another billion. We have SIXTEEN TRILLION to pay off. Even if Romney's nonsensical numbers add up, his plan only saves around 200 billion. The rest of his savings come from reducing "waste and fraud" (yay, specifics!) and paying federal employees less and firing a bunch of them so we can pay them nothing. So we save money by having more people be unemployed, and thus paying no income tax? I don't understand that one. Supposedly we save 58 billion by firing people and making them take pay cuts. So our total is a little bit above 300 billion. Out of sixteen trillion. With substantially lower revenues and more military spending. Sounds like we'll be lucky if we break even.

So in total, Romney also wants to lay off workers, spend more on the military, and further reduce revenue by substantially cutting the taxes on the rich. So a lot of that 300 billion is just going to disappear with lowered revenues, going to buy more state of the art airplanes that we won't use, or go into the pockets of the upper class. So we won't actually get any money set aside to pay off debt.
=
Yeah, some plan.
sounds about right....tax cuts for the rich which the middle class will pay for, increased military spending, gutting of all social programs, go all out to gut unions so his business cronies can pay less, and can fire people more easily, do away with current enviormental laws so his cronies can pollute our air, our water, and our land at will...drill baby drill will be the energy plan, with no concern for when we burn through our oil , no investment in alternative energy sources, he will make sure women continue to earn less than men, and have no say in their reproductive issues such as abortion. he will also gut student aid programs, hurting our future generations.....this is the plan
 
sounds about right....tax cuts for the rich which the middle class will pay for, increased military spending, gutting of all social programs, go all out to gut unions so his business cronies can pay less, and can fire people more easily, do away with current enviormental laws so his cronies can pollute our air, our water, and our land at will...drill baby drill will be the energy plan, with no concern for when we burn through our oil , no investment in alternative energy sources, he will make sure women continue to earn less than men, and have no say in their reproductive issues such as abortion. he will also gut student aid programs, hurting our future generations.....this is the plan
also, did i mention, that we will probably be at war with iran and syria under a romney administration, two wars that we can't afford, but who cares, so long as we can get more tax cuts for the rich.
 
Nope, that is a huge leap, no one said that Spike. Look, Obama on the trail in '08 called Bush unpatriotic for amassing some 5 trillion in debt in 8 years, so what does that make him for amassing 5 trillion in 3?
A victim!

Don't you see? That 5 trillion is just a steak and martini and stuff:

"They baked all this stuff into the cake with those tax cuts… and the war," Obama said.

"It’s like somebody goes to a restaurant, orders a big steak dinner, a martini and all that stuff, then just as you're sitting down they leave and accuse you of running up the tab," Obama said. (June, 2012)

Blaming Obama for continuing Bush's tax cuts and defense policies makes about as much sense as blaming him for massive deficit spending, failed energy initiatives, and a hugely unpopular healthcare law.

Give the guy a break, he's only 90% of the way through his Presidency - he's "just sitting down."
 
Well. This is what I did. I took your thread title, I put it into Google.

First link.

Jobs and Economic Growth | Mitt Romney for President

Right!!!

He hasn't seen the plans Mitt Romney has at the convention... Because first off Mitt Romney hasn't spoken... secondly most people don't release plans at the convention... and HE HASN'T LOOKED!!!

Mitt Romney has several guidelines of policies he would attempt to initiate if elected president...

They're not acute detailed plans, because they can't be... the Congress is involved in the drafting of legislation, and no legislator wastes time drafting legislation with a candidate for office, they wait until they're elected...

But, go Romney's website and he has laid out plans... he also had a speech in Detroit during the convention which he addressed the economic policies he'd push for...

I think the difference is, you're expecting a falsely propped up hype like the BS Obama delivered... "Ill guy you X amount of trillions of dollars to buy you jobs for a short while"...

Romney isn't making false promises...

He is right, though, Obama's record is abysmal, and Romney's record is stellar... why not continue to run on that...
 
Give the guy a break, he's only 90% of the way through his Presidency - he's "just sitting down."

Correction: he's only 40% of the way through his presidency. :thumbs:
 
Sorry to be obviously the first to fill you in, but intentional misrepresentation is a hallmark of Socialist propaganda. Your plan for the past 4 years has failed. Live with it. America doesn't want your agenda, but I suspect that Cuba has some slots open....Have fun.

If you feel I've mischaracterized what Governor Romney's website says, please offer what you feel is a more accurate interpretation.
 
A victim!

Don't you see? That 5 trillion is just a steak and martini and stuff:



Blaming Obama for continuing Bush's tax cuts and defense policies makes about as much sense as blaming him for massive deficit spending, failed energy initiatives, and a hugely unpopular healthcare law.

Give the guy a break, he's only 90% of the way through his Presidency - he's "just sitting down."


Yeah, he's sitting down allright....To clean the clubs for his 140th round of golf.
 
Back
Top Bottom