• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Romney's tale about Bain, not adding up: [W:37]

muciti said:
Hasnt it been stated that Romney was still somehow involved with Bain for a couple years after retirement repeatedly already? I could be mistaken but I dont think this is news.
Click to expand...

I think that is when he declared that he "retroactively" retired. Whatever the hell that means.
 
Blue_State said:
Who will continue to put up multiple threads a day on same old garbage about Romney. Never about an issue.
Click to expand...

I believe he is a seminar poster paid to spew this nonsense
 
Is this another ability you garnered from your correspondence mind reading course?

Why could he not be what he claims to be - a conservative unhappy with Romney?
 
haymarket said:
Is this another ability you garnered from your correspondence mind reading course?

Why could he not be what he claims to be - a conservative unhappy with Romney?
Click to expand...
well if you actually read his posts its pretty obvious.
 
TurtleDude said:
well if you actually read his posts its pretty obvious.
Click to expand...

To you perhaps.

But self imposed belief and ideological fervor tend to do that to people who are True Believers.
 
haymarket said:
To you perhaps.

But self imposed belief and ideological fervor tend to do that to people who are True Believers.
Click to expand...


well when a "conservative" posts 95% of the time bashing Romney and never obama its pretty obvious to intelligent people he is a POE.

have you read his posts?
 
haymarket said:
To you perhaps.

But self imposed belief and ideological fervor tend to do that to people who are True Believers.
Click to expand...

Exactly the traits AgainstRomney screams with every post. He's either a disgruntled Paulite or a sockpuppet, perhaps both. In any event, he's not as advertised.
 
clownboy said:
Exactly the traits AgainstRomney screams with every post. He's either a disgruntled Paulite or a sockpuppet, perhaps both. In any event, he's not as advertised.
Click to expand...

Why is it important to discredit a Romney critic with attacks upon them and who they may or may not be rather than spend the time refuting what they say with evidence?
 
haymarket said:
To you perhaps.

But self imposed belief and ideological fervor tend to do that to people who are True Believers.
Click to expand...
There are conservative objections to Romney, many in fact, that go back to his days as governor and his past statements. But those arent the arguments that ConsagainstRomney makes. He trots out the liberal objections like his wealth, his taxes, and his days at Bain. So it is painfully obvious that he really represents LibsagainstRomney. If you dont see that then it is perhaps your own self imposed belief and ideological fervor that is in the way.
 
Wrong, I've never once held anything against Romney because of his wealth. Go back and read my posts. And the reason for that is that I go not begrudge wealthy people. In fact I know many millionaires and I have even met billionaires before. Money doesnt make the person in my opinion. It has nothng to do with wheterh someone is a good person or a bad person.

haymarket said:
Why is it important to discredit a Romney critic with attacks upon them and who they may or may not be rather than spend the time refuting what they say with evidence?
Click to expand...

That question pretty much answers itself: There IS NO argument against what I have pointed out about Romney beacause all I have argued is the facts. THe fact, for instance, that without question, Romney's spending record as GOv of Mass was outrageously LIBERAL. I have shown that he is a flip flopper by posting Romeny's own words - where he will day one thing and then say the EXACT opposite just a short time later.
I am only speaking the truth. I am only presenting fact - the facts about ROmney's record - and I am presenting the actual things ROmney has said.
So when someone is faced with ireputible facts and they have no leg to stand on in concerning theri argument, they can either 1)conceed to the other person or they can 2) make personal attacks on that person.
So everytime some of these blind Partisan make personal attacks on me while totally ignoring the facts, I actually look upon it as validation as to what I am saying is true and that it is hitting where it counts.
 
Last edited:
Moderator's Warning:
Next person who's post focuses on a poster an not the topic, will get thread banned at least. Cease this behavior.
 
Fletch said:
Yes, conservatives will be so outraged by this horrendous 'lie' that they will not vote for him. Meaning another 4 years of Obama. Right. Not sure who you think you are fooling with this stuff, but keep it up,it is entertaining.
Click to expand...

As a COnservative it is not about a lesser of two evils. Romney and Obama BOTH are liberals. TRUE Conservatives do not vote for liberals - it only perpetuates the liberal agenda. We True FISCAL COnservatives will not vote for Romney for the same reason we will not vote for Obama: he does not represent our fiscal COnservative beliefs. Romney would be no better than Obama in lowering the national debt. His record as GOv of Mass expreses that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom