• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Romney Predicted to win November election[W:172]

Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

Conservative said:
Right, none of the following matters to an "American Idol" voter
Click to expand...

Con, you are a proven hypocrite. You say the buck stops at the presidency (unless it's a GOP president) and blame liberals for evrything under the sun while you think conservatives are pure angels that have done no wrong. Sorry, but your beyond having any reasonable or logical discussion with because you grasp the illogical and can't comprehend that while you may post factual DATA, the INTERPRETATION of that DATA is OPINION.

So yes, you are dismissed because all you spout is Rhetoric ABOUT data while blaming liberals for absolutely everything.
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

Conservative said:
Obama wouldn't have to spend a dime if he had the results he promised and results that showed positive leadership and strong economic results
Click to expand...

Now there is true wisdom for you. :roll: A nationwide election for President in 2012 and you expect that a candidate who is opposed by at least a billion dollars in funding "wouldn't have to spend a dime". :doh

Does your degree in Political Science come from a Texas institution of higher learning. ;)
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

TheNextEra said:
Con, you are a proven hypocrite. You say the buck stops at the presidency (unless it's a GOP president) and blame liberals for evrything under the sun while you think conservatives are pure angels that have done no wrong. Sorry, but your beyond having any reasonable or logical discussion with because you grasp the illogical and can't comprehend that while you may post factual DATA, the INTERPRETATION of that DATA is OPINION.

So yes, you are dismissed because all you spout is Rhetoric ABOUT data while blaming liberals for absolutely everything.
Click to expand...

The buck does stop at the door of the President and if Bush were running again I wouldn't have voted for him in 2008 unless the candidate was Gore, Kerry, or Obama neither of which had the resume showing leadership.

I keep waiting for your interpretation of the data I posted because non partisan numbers don't lie but liars do post false numbers.
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

haymarket said:
Now there is true wisdom for you. :roll: A nationwide election for President in 2012 and you expect that a candidate who is opposed by at least a billion dollars in funding "wouldn't have to spend a dime". :doh

Does your degree in Political Science come from a Texas institution of higher learning. ;)
Click to expand...

Obama needs the money to destroy his opponent and to run from his record. A good positive record wouldn't require him spending a dime and that billion dollars could be used for better purposes. The President has the "bully pulpit" and with positive results would have won re-election easily but rather than run on his record he runs from his record and needs money to do that
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

Conservative said:
I keep waiting for your interpretation of the data I posted because non partisan numbers don't lie but liars do post false numbers.
Click to expand...

I've posted it over and over again. You simply ignore it each and every time I've done it Con. You have asked specific questions and I have answered them. Then you ignore my answers and run and hide for a few days or a week in other posts and then rinse and repeat.

It's a cycle of ignorance on your part.
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

AdamT said:
I'm pretty sure that FDR would have been a one-term president under their model.
Click to expand...

the country would be much better off today if FDR was a one term president
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

TheNextEra said:
I've posted it over and over again. You simply ignore it each and every time I've done it Con. You have asked specific questions and I have answered them. Then you ignore my answers and run and hide for a few days or a week in other posts and then rinse and repeat.

It's a cycle of ignorance on your part.
Click to expand...

No, you didn't post it over and over again because no one can defend the Obama record thus Obama has to spend a billion dollars to run from that record. I think you must live in your own little dream world where you believe you did one thing when you did the opposite. The one thing you can count on from any liberal here is diversion, distortion, and personal attacks against anyone that dares post data to refute their opinions
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

Conservative said:
Obama needs the money to destroy his opponent and to run from his record. A good positive record wouldn't require him spending a dime and that billion dollars could be used for better purposes. The President has the "bully pulpit" and with positive results would have won re-election easily but rather than run on his record he runs from his record and needs money to do that
Click to expand...

What malarkey. Can you name for us a major party candidate for President in the last eighty years who could simply run on a record and not spend a dime?
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

Bobcat said:
the country would be much better off today if FDR was a one term president
Click to expand...

We would not have a country today. At least one with an American flag flying over it.
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

Taylor said:
1% is not exactly a "commanding lead"...

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - General Election: Romney vs. Obama
Click to expand...

Other than NBC, I find it interesting the more RV that are polled, the closer the race. At least that's what I see with the recent polls.The president must be worried over Gallup and Rasmussen since IMO they are the most reliable. It just doesn't make sense that Obama could be re-elected with this economy. Geez... He firmly criticized Bush for raising our debt and he does it twice as quickly. 16 trillion will likely turn to 20-21 trillion with 4 more yrs of Obama. And how can independents vote for a president with an unemployment rate above 8%? I could go on but what I've already said is nothing new and the voters will either vote with their brains or heart. If we have more issue oriented voters... then it could be a Romney landslide.
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

haymarket said:
What malarkey. Can you name for us a major party candidate for President in the last eighty years who could simply run on a record and not spend a dime?
Click to expand...
Reagan could have done it in '84. He did spend money on the campaign that year but in reality he could have spent all the money on lap dances or something and he still would have crushed Mondale. Also, Clinton in '96 could have beaten Bob Dole with the same amount of money that my little girl currently has in her piggy bank.
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

Jack Fabulous said:
Reagan could have done it in '84. He did spend money on the campaign that year but in reality he could have spent all the money on lap dances or something and he still would have crushed Mondale. Also, Clinton in '96 could have beaten Bob Dole with the same amount of money that my little girl currently has in her piggy bank.
Click to expand...

And you have the use of the Professor Peabody Way Back machine to take us to an alternate 1984 USA to validate this claim? :roll: Really now!
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

haymarket said:
And you have the use of the Professor Peabody Way Back machine to take us to an alternate 1984 USA to validate this claim? :roll: Really now!
Click to expand...
Ummm.... the economy in the late 70s was in as bad or worse shape than it is now. By 1984 a pretty dramatic turn-around was well underway and people could feel it. Add to that the bumbling idiot Walter Mondale who ran against Reagan and, yes, it was going to be a blowout no matter what.

P.S. I couldn't help but notice that you didn't have a problem with 96?
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

Compatibilist said:
It just doesn't make sense that Obama could be re-elected with this economy.
Click to expand...
If history repeats itself, he won't be - the last time a President was re-elected with unemployment this bad, FDR was in office, and Obama is no FDR.

Compatibilist said:
And how can independents vote for a president with an unemployment rate above 8%?
Click to expand...
Obama is currently losing among independents, which is another very bad sign for his campaign.

Compatibilist said:
I could go on but what I've already said is nothing new
Click to expand...
Indeed - No President has ever won without an increase in support, no President has ever been outspent in a re-election bid...

Of course, statistics don't win elections. Four years ago, no black man had won a nomination, much less the Presidency.

Obama still has high likability and that can carry him quite far. Who knows? Enough of these statistics and he'll start to look like the underdog... America loves the underdog.
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

haymarket said:
What malarkey. Can you name for us a major party candidate for President in the last eighty years who could simply run on a record and not spend a dime?
Click to expand...

Because all candidates raise money does that make it right? Does it make it right that Obama is trying to raise 1 billion dollars to hide his record because he doesn't have a record to run on. Obama has raised more money than any other incumbant in history and what is he spending it on, lies, distortions,and diversions.
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

Jack Fabulous said:
You are correct about Obama staying away from Wisconsin. The funny thing is that Wisconsin went rather big for Obama in 08.
Click to expand...

Polls are showing that Obama is ahead in Wisconsin. In fact, he's ahead in all the battleground states, except for N. Carolina and Missouri. He's even way ahead with the electoral votes.....


RealClearPolitics - Election 2012
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

Moot said:
Polls are showing that Obama is ahead in Wisconsin. In fact, he's ahead in all the battleground states, except for N. Carolina and Missouri. He's even way ahead with the electoral votes.....


RealClearPolitics - Election 2012
Click to expand...

Looks to me like all battleground states are within the margin of error and if you have been following the polls 221 electoral votes is the lowest Obama has ever had. I am sure the incredibly great economic results of another trillion dollar deficit, 16 trillion dollar debt, 1.5% GDP growth, more unemployed today after spending all that money is starting to take its toll on the Obama lead. Obama will be fired in November based upon his results and the fact that all that effort to be seen on TV and all that fund raising won't change the terrible leadership of Obama
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

Moot said:
Polls are showing that Obama is ahead in Wisconsin. In fact, he's ahead in all the battleground states, except for N. Carolina and Missouri. He's even way ahead with the electoral votes.....


RealClearPolitics - Election 2012
Click to expand...
Polls at this stage are about as reliable as a 10 day weather forecast.

In the Massachusetts Senate race of 2010 I believe Brown was down in the polls by double digits less than a week out. Leading up to the recall election in Wisconsin most polls I saw had it close and within the margin of error. Then election day came and... THUD. I think the same thing is going to happen in November. When questioned by pollsters I have a theory that most people feel a sort of implied pressure to answer questions with a tilt towards "political correctness". Once inside the privacy of a voting booth there is no such pressure.

I don't think this one will even be close.
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

Conservative said:
Obama needs the money to destroy his opponent and to run from his record. A good positive record wouldn't require him spending a dime and that billion dollars could be used for better purposes. The President has the "bully pulpit" and with positive results would have won re-election easily but rather than run on his record he runs from his record and needs money to do that
Click to expand...
It sounds more like you're describing Romney when you talk about 'runs from his record."


Why can't Romney be more specific about what spending cuts he would make? In fact, he hasn't been specific on anything that he would do and thats very troublesome for a lot of people, especially seniors. Really, all I hear from Romney are lying attacks on Obama and that just makes him look bitter.


Romney may be getting more campaign funding from the likes of a few billionaires, but most of Obama's funding is coming from small donors of $250 or less. So if you translate the number of donors into voters, then Obama is winning by a landslide.
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

Moot said:
It sounds more like you're describing Romney when you talk about 'runs from his record."


Why can't Romney be more specific about what spending cuts he would make? In fact, he hasn't been specific on anything that he would do and thats very troublesome for a lot of people, especially seniors. Really, all I hear from Romney are lying attacks on Obama and that just makes him look bitter.


Romney may be getting more campaign funding from the likes of a few billionaires, but most of Obama's funding is coming from small donors of $250 or less. So if you translate the number of donors into voters, then Obama is winning by a landslide.
Click to expand...

Romney will be more specific after the convention but it really doesn't matter because anything Romney proposes is going to be better than what we have now. The Paul Ryan budget is better than what we have now. The waivers for Obamacare will be better than we have now. The lack of demonization of producers is better than what we have now.

Seniors are being brainwashed by the Obama Adminstration because Obama cannot run on his record but rather only demonize and try to destroy his opponent. Obama is running against the 2011 Ryan plan and not the 2012 plan but both made no changes to Medicare for anyone over 55. Seems you got caught up in the Obama lies as well.

Not sure where you get your information but you really aren't doing very well posting facts. There is absolutely no reason to vote for Obama and plenty of reason to vote against him unless you have the same economic beliefs as he has in that we need a nanny state and massive central govt. to implement it.
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

Conservative said:
Looks to me like all battleground states are within the margin of error and if you have been following the polls 221 electoral votes is the lowest Obama has ever had. I am sure the incredibly great economic results of another trillion dollar deficit, 16 trillion dollar debt, 1.5% GDP growth, more unemployed today after spending all that money is starting to take its toll on the Obama lead. Obama will be fired in November based upon his results and the fact that all that effort to be seen on TV and all that fund raising won't change the terrible leadership of Obama
Click to expand...

What you fail to understand is that most of those unemployed are African American and polls show that they are 99.999% behind Obama and 0% for Romney. LOL

Btw, Bill Clinton is coming out with a new ad for Obama and I hear it's going to knock Romney out of the water. I can't wait to see it.
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

For the first time I think Obama is in trouble. Romney is closing the gap despite the Akin controversy in the Real Clear averages poll.

I live in a swing state and all I'm seeing are Romney ads; nothing from Obama at present. Maybe with the RNC convention so soon, its expected to be a bounce for Romney so why blow the money. ????
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

Moot said:
What you fail to understand is that most of those unemployed are African American and polls show that they are 99.999% behind Obama and 0% for Romney. LOL

Btw, Bill Clinton is coming out with a new ad for Obama and I hear it's going to knock Romney out of the water. I can't wait to see it.
Click to expand...

Yes, I understand that so that is why I asked what the first "black" President has done for African Americans since their unemployment and economic conditions today are worse than they were when Obama took office. Doubt the number is 99.999% but probably more like 89%. regardless that is way too high for the actual results generated. Looks like complete brainwashing to me

Can't wait to see it either, with such great economic results I am sure it will address those results. Regardless looks like economic results don't interest you. Still in school? Ask recent college graduates how they are doing on job hunting and how many have to return home to live with their parents. Instead of "Morning in America" today it is Mourning in America
 
Re: Romney Predicted to win November election

Conservative said:
Romney will be more specific after the convention but it really doesn't matter because anything Romney proposes is going to be better than what we have now. The Paul Ryan budget is better than what we have now. The waivers for Obamacare will be better than we have now. The lack of demonization of producers is better than what we have now.
Click to expand...
It's precisely the Ryan budget and his views on rape and abortion that is scaring people away from Romney. Really, he couldn't have a picked a more extreme candidate. Good for Dems, bad for Repubs.

Seniors are being brainwashed by the Obama Adminstration because Obama cannot run on his record but rather only demonize and try to destroy his opponent. Obama is running against the 2011 Ryan plan and not the 2012 plan but both made no changes to Medicare for anyone over 55. Seems you got caught up in the Obama lies as well.
Click to expand...
Wow, brainwashed, eh? What an insult to seniors that you think they are incapable of voting for what is in their best interest instead of along party lines. But we shall see what we shall see.

Not sure where you get your information but you really aren't doing very well posting facts. There is absolutely no reason to vote for Obama and plenty of reason to vote against him unless you have the same economic beliefs as he has in that we need a nanny state and massive central govt. to implement it.
Click to expand...
I could say the same about you if it would do any good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom