• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

A Campaign Full of Mediscare-Fact Checking The Campaigns

Redress

Liberal Fascist For Life!
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
112,958
Reaction score
60,492
Location
Sarasota Fla
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
http://news.yahoo.com/campaign-full-mediscare-143519760.html

It is a long article but a good read. Both campaigns get taken to task for their less than honest claims about Medicare.

Some highlights(feel free to pick your own):

In the past, we’ve thrown cold water on claims — including one from Paul Ryan — that Medicare was going to be “bankrupt.” That’s still a big exaggeration. Medicare is not going out of business, and seniors won’t suddenly be stripped of their Medicare coverage. Under current projections, the system can muddle along unchanged for at least another dozen years. But then, tens of millions of seniors would start to feel the pinch.

Yes, that's right. Medicare is not going to go bankrupt. That does not mean it is not in trouble nor does it mean things don't need to be done.

There’s good reason for wanting to slow down spending (see “Medicare is in trouble,” above). And it’s a common campaign ruse for one side to cast its ideas as “savings” that will extend the life of Medicare, while disparaging the other side’s ideas as drastic cuts that will slash benefits for seniors.


The candidates disagree strongly on how to accomplish their common goal, but both have proposed cutting — or, if you’d rather, “saving” — money from the future growth of Medicare spending.

I like that, what is savings when you do it is drastic cuts when the other guy does it.
 
Back
Top Bottom