• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Koch's bribed Romney with a $100 million to pick Ryan for his VP

I think it was designed to succeed by people who don't have a clue.

It's like i were to suddenly decide to design a car or to build a house. I could have the best intentions in history, but with my limited knowledge and lack of experience, failure is the only place those endeavors could end.

I agree it was designed to fail. Once we are so far down the road, and it fails, it's your back door to single payer......

Go talk to some brokers, they'll tell you what is going on behind the scenes. Insurance companies cutting agent commissions to position themselves for financial losses of catastrophic proportions. It's designed not only to fail, but to bankrupt private insurance companies. When that happens, they believe there is one alternative......single payer.
 
Affordable healthcare is the name of the bill. The name of the bills passed through Congress have about as much to do with content as the names of Led Zeplin songs have to do with their content.

That said, though, connecting the words Affordable and healthcare speak to the issue that this has to do with money, not the services purchased by the money. The services are unchanged, the payments for those services are reduced and the providers will little by little find other ways to make money.

Again, what are the provisions of the bill that improve the delivery of or the quality of services?
The majority of doctors, nurses and medical organizations disagree with you that the AFA won't help improve quality of healthcare...

Medical groups laud Supreme Court's decision on Affordable Care Act - HealthPop - CBS News
 
I agree it was designed to fail. Once we are so far down the road, and it fails, it's your back door to single payer......

Go talk to some brokers, they'll tell you what is going on behind the scenes. Insurance companies cutting agent commissions to position themselves for financial losses of catastrophic proportions. It's designed not only to fail, but to bankrupt private insurance companies. When that happens, they believe there is one alternative......single payer.


Which is why ObamaCare and RomneyCare were mistakes.
 
GOP Consultant: Koch Brothers Bought Ryan’s Nomination With $100 Million Promise

Veteran Republican political consultant, unrepentant dirty trickster, and recently reborn libertarian Roger Stone yesterday published a startling accusation against Paul Ryan and Mitt Romney on his personal website, The Stone Zone. According to Stone, the billionaire Koch brothers purchased the Republican vice presidential nomination for Ryan from Romney in late July by promising to fork over an additional $100 million toward “independent expenditure” campaigning for the GOP ticket.

Any such transaction would represent a serious violation of federal election laws and perhaps other statutes, aside from the ethical and character implications for all concerned...."


The National Memo » GOP Consultant: Koch Brothers Bought Ryan’s Nomination With $100 Million Promise

Roger Stone: The Stone Zone


Apparently, the wealthy don't think our laws apply to them. Why isn't the DOJ and the IRS cracking down on these crooks?

And this is why the supreme courts approval ratings are at all time lows!

Kennedy, writing for the court’s 5-4 majority, said corporate independent campaign expenditures “do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption.”

The Supreme Court
 
Which is why ObamaCare and RomneyCare were mistakes.
Isn't that like saying the GOP are a mistake since Obamacare was based on Romneycare and Romneycare was originally a Republican plan?
 
Much like every presidential election in my memory, imho.
It seems it's always a choice between a **** sandwich and a giant douche bag. Yay South Park!

The idea that we choose between two evils on election day is older than anyone who is alive to post on these boards.


Until we have perfect people, we will always choose between the better of the candidates.
 
Until we have perfect people, we will always choose between the better of the candidates.

As long as both parties serve special interest we will always choose between cancer or AIDS.

It doesn't have anything to do with the lesser of two evils, it has to do with the idea that if you have to choose between losing your hand or losing your foot, your best off just refusing to play.

I say vote for anyone other then a Democrat or Republican, or don't vote, because voting for a R or a D at this point is like asking for someone to cut off your hand or foot.

I'm voting Gary Johnson come November 4th.
 
As long as both parties serve special interest we will always choose between cancer or AIDS.

It doesn't have anything to do with the lesser of two evils, it has to do with the idea that if you have to choose between losing your hand or losing your foot, your best off just refusing to play.

I say vote for anyone other then a Democrat or Republican, or don't vote, because voting for a R or a D at this point is like asking for someone to cut off your hand or foot.

I'm voting Gary Johnson come November 4th.


Both candidates represent different factions of the American people. Until we as a people are perfect, we will continue to have imperfect candidates to represent us. We get the government we deserve.
 
The majority of doctors, nurses and medical organizations disagree with you that the AFA won't help improve quality of healthcare...

Medical groups laud Supreme Court's decision on Affordable Care Act - HealthPop - CBS News


I didn't see the part where the actual care is discussed. Paying for the care that is provided is discussed and that what I said.

Do you have a link that explains how the care will be improved, made more efficient or less cumbersome? I was hoping for something like walk in clinics to replace E=Room visits, but that's not a part of it. Neither is group homes for care or targeted care for neighborhoods without adequate medical facilities.

See? There are actual idea that could reduce costs, but that is not the goal in this. the goal is to handle the money and centralize the power of government.

The government that is able to give you everything you need is able to take everything that you have.
 
I didn't see the part where the actual care is discussed. Paying for the care that is provided is discussed and that what I said.

Do you have a link that explains how the care will be improved, made more efficient or less cumbersome? I was hoping for something like walk in clinics to replace E=Room visits, but that's not a part of it. Neither is group homes for care or targeted care for neighborhoods without adequate medical facilities.

See? There are actual idea that could reduce costs, but that is not the goal in this. the goal is to handle the money and centralize the power of government.

The government that is able to give you everything you need is able to take everything that you have.
I'm not your gopher. If you want to know what is in the bill then READ IT!!!! It has funding for nursing homes and walk in clinics. YEA!!! If you don't understand what affordable healthcare has to do with healthcare then that is your problem, not mine. This notion you have that the government is giving everything for free is BS. Don't worry, you will be paying for your share through PRIVATE INSURANCE. That is what is called TAKING PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. Geezus, get a clue.
 
Last edited:
Romney is so much more sophisticated and economically literate than Obama, it's scary.

STENGEL: Another sort of related business question, if you look at the regulatory environment for the banks now and there are basically five big banks that in terms of assets disproportionately outweigh everybody else, is there a situation of moral hazard now related to those banks? And what would you do to reform the financial sector? Would you bring something back like Glass-Steagall? How do you see it, Governor?

ROMNEY: I think Dodd-Frank has contributed to a concentration of banking assets into the hands of a small number of banks. By designating certain banks as being too big to fail, strategically important banks, it makes it more difficult for the banks not so designated to attract customers and to expand their business. What you’ve seen as a result is a concentration in the hands of a handful of banks that now has greater systemic threat that what even existed before.

The right course was not to say that this handful of banks will be protected by the government, implying therefore that all the rest of the banks are on their own, because smart depositors will all move towards the banks that are protected by government. It had the opposite effect of what was advertised. What was advertised was that we would keep the too big to fail banks from getting bigger, but the result of the legislation is just the opposite.

What we need to do is to make it easier for the community and local banks and regional banks to succeed and thrive because they, after all, are the places where small and medium-size businesses get their funding. So the whole idea of designating a handful of banks as the government-protected too big to fail banks is the wrong course.

Now, we do need to have regulation in the banking industry. Extensive regulation is appropriate in an industry that has such an impact on the overall economy. We have to look at what the causes were of the last crisis and take action to prevent those causes from reappearing. What kinds of things come to mind include capital requirements, levels of leverage which are appropriate and inappropriate, banks maintaining risk in assets which they gather. Specifically, I’m referring to the idea if a bank originates a loan or a mortgage that it should be on the hook for some portion of the loss if that loan or mortgage fails. These kinds of provisions, I think, would be directly applicable to the kind of crisis that we experienced before.

A Certain Enthusiasm: Romney Edges Toward Banking Reform

He knows his stuff in a way Obama never has.
 
Romney is so much more sophisticated and economically literate than Obama, it's scary.
Then why doesn't he have a job?
 
Back
Top Bottom