• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Fox News poll: Obama's lead grows as Romney's support slips

Redress said:
Do you have anything to say about the poll, are you just going to ramble on about random stuff?
Click to expand...

He only has 3 posts in his inventory each of which have been posted 10,000 times. I think he thought that one fit the closest. Rumor has it he plans to develop a 4th post over Labor Day weekend.
 
Bobcat said:
hey, we get it. you guys love marxism. VOTE OBAMA FOR MORE MARXIST COLLECTIVISM, PUNISH SUCCESS AND REWARD FAILURE--VOTE OBAMA.
Click to expand...

Without googling, define Marxism in your own words.
 
Conservative said:
You can only blame the inherited economy so long for here it is over 3 years after taking office and most of the results are worse than when he took office. Too many don't understand leadership but those that have been leaders know you don't delegate responsibility. The economic results today are Barack Obama's period. He commissioned Bowles/Simpson then ignored their results. He formed a jobs commission and hasn't met with them in the last six months, he runs as an outsider after controlling the economy for over 3 three years, he promotes green energy without a market for green energy. He lacks any leadership skills but his supporters don't seem to care. Why don't you care about his results?
Click to expand...

Yeah, when he was first elected, I though "give him a chance", perhaps it won't be all that bad. But I have see not a lot improve over his term, and much get worse. This includes even things like closing more BLM and FS land to the public and so much more. Now I am certain if he is re-elected, odds are things will continue along a bad path.
 
Arbo said:
Yeah, when he was first elected, I though "give him a chance", perhaps it won't be all that bad. But I have see not a lot improve over his term, and much get worse. This includes even things like closing more BLM and FS land to the public and so much more. Now I am certain if he is re-elected, odds are things will continue along a bad path.
Click to expand...

This is indeed a choice election, the people can choose the guy who gave us the results we have today or someone with a vision and results that will reverse the last four years of empty rhetoric, no leadership, and poor results.
 
Conservative said:
This is indeed a choice election, the people can choose the guy who gave us the results we have today or someone with a vision and results that will reverse the last four years of empty rhetoric, no leadership, and poor results.
Click to expand...

There is such a guy running? How did I miss that?

Honestly, if Romney wins, I don't see a heck of a lot of difference coming down the pike. A little here and there, but I don't know if it will be enough to spark a needed change. And I'm guessing he will quickly give speeches like Obama, full of words but short on substance.
 
Arbo said:
There is such a guy running? How did I miss that?

Honestly, if Romney wins, I don't see a heck of a lot of difference coming down the pike. A little here and there, but I don't know if it will be enough to spark a needed change. And I'm guessing he will quickly give speeches like Obama, full of words but short on substance.
Click to expand...

Maybe he'll replace Obamacare with Romneycare.
 
upsideguy said:
He only has 3 posts in his inventory each of which have been posted 10,000 times. I think he thought that one fit the closest. Rumor has it he plans to develop a 4th post over Labor Day weekend.
Click to expand...

This is actually a major improvement from the time when he would literally copy and paste the same post over and over.
 
hazlnut said:
As President, implementing his mandate program would make it Federal.
Click to expand...

Romney understands states rights and if Romney implements Romneycare nationally he will be a one term President
 
Conservative said:
Romney understands states rights and if Romney implements Romneycare nationally he will be a one term President
Click to expand...

Yes, well... all hypothetical fantasy now that he's chosen PeeWee as his running mate. Or wait, is Ryan running for President.

I'm confused after the press conference...
 
Conservative said:
Romney understands states rights and if Romney implements Romneycare nationally he will be a one term President
Click to expand...

The SCOTUS has already ruled on The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act so if you know something they don't then you are just flapping your lips.
 
Conservative said:
Romney understands states rights and if Romney implements Romneycare nationally he will be a one term President
Click to expand...

Yes, Romney is a socialist ... but only at the state level! :lamo
 
hazlnut said:
Yes, well... all hypothetical fantasy now that he's chosen PeeWee as his running mate. Or wait, is Ryan running for President.

I'm confused after the press conference...
Click to expand...

Not surprising to me at all that you are confused by any press conferance for as an Obamabot it doesn't support your feelings.
 
Grim17 said:
The debates are going to be a hoot, because last time I checked, no teleprompters were allowed.

You know, it wouldn't surprise me a bit if Obama weaseled his way out of one or more of the debates.
Click to expand...

I don't remember him needing a teleprompter to kick the crap out of McCain. You really think Mitt Romney, perhaps the dullest speaker to run for President in a long time, is going to take out Obama? What are you smoking?
 
Wiggen said:
I don't remember him needing a teleprompter to kick the crap out of McCain. You really think Mitt Romney, perhaps the dullest speaker to run for President in a long time, is going to take out Obama? What are you smoking?
Click to expand...

The debates should be fun, someone from the private sector that actually knows how to run a business and make money vs the teleprompter President who cannot keep his lies straight.
 
Conservative said:
Not surprising to me at all that you are confused by any press conferance for as an Obamabot it doesn't support your feelings.
Click to expand...


I thought Romney was running for President, but he introduced Ryan and 'the next President.'

Maybe Ryan will handle the day-to-day White House business, while Romney will just phone his instructions in from the Caymans or Switzerland?
 
hazlnut said:
I thought Romney was running for President, but he introduced Ryan and 'the next President.'

Maybe Ryan will handle the day-to-day White House business, while Romney will just phone his instructions in from the Caymans or Switzerland?
Click to expand...

Saw Obama do the same thing with Biden and correct it just like Romney did. Again no substance just diversion and personal attacks.
 
hazlnut said:
I thought Romney was running for President, but he introduced Ryan and 'the next President.'

Maybe Ryan will handle the day-to-day White House business, while Romney will just phone his instructions in from the Caymans or Switzerland?
Click to expand...

Sure wish someone would send Obama a map to show him where his job's counsel is meeting. Think you can do that?
 
hazlnut said:
I thought Romney was running for President, but he introduced Ryan and 'the next President.'

Maybe Ryan will handle the day-to-day White House business, while Romney will just phone his instructions in from the Caymans or Switzerland?
Click to expand...

No misspeak at all. Romney is a visionary. He does see Ryan has the next US President..... in 2016. Then again, that really can't be true as losing VP candidates never get to be POTUS (except FDR).
 
upsideguy said:
No misspeak at all. Romney is a visionary. He does see Ryan has the next US President..... in 2016. Then again, that really can't be true as losing VP candidates never get to be POTUS (except FDR).
Click to expand...

Presiden Ryan--didn't Tom Clancy write about that?
 
Conservative said:
Romney understands states rights and if Romney implements Romneycare nationally he will be a one term President
Click to expand...

Trying to draw the distinction between the Massachusetts healthcare initiative of Romney and the ACA on states rights is one of the most ridiculous rationalizations ever attempted by any party. They are the same thing.

http://patriot-newswire.com/2012/04/is-romneycare-the-same-as-obamacare/

PolitiFact | Romney says his health care bill affected far smaller percentage of people than Obama's

Healthcare is a national crisis (we continue to have one of the most expensive (17% of GDP)
/ least effective healthcare systems in the world).

Kiplinger.com
Healthcare System Ratings: U.S., Great Britain, Canada
Health Care Spending

I suppose one could argue how best to go about fixing the problem. By rarely to we, as a nation, sit back on national problems and expect the states to solve them one-by-one. This is a national/interstate commerce issue if there ever was one. It is not something that can be practically solved on a state by state basis any more than the FAA could be run on a state by state basis.

I appreciate the box the Cons have put themselves in regarding healthcare reform. But this whole states rights deal is nothing by a rationalization and the perpetration of it is rather disingenuous.
 
Last edited:
upsideguy said:
Trying to draw the distinction between the Massachusetts healthcare initiative of Romney and the ACA on states rights is one of the most ridiculous rationalizations ever attempted by any party. They are the same thing.

Is Romneycare the Same As Obamacare? : Patriot Newswire

PolitiFact | Romney says his health care bill affected far smaller percentage of people than Obama's

Healthcare is a national crisis (we continue to have one of the most expensive (17% of GDP)
/ least effective healthcare systems in the world).

Kiplinger.com
Healthcare System Ratings: U.S., Great Britain, Canada
Health Care Spending

I suppose one could argue how best to go about fixing the problem. By rarely to we, as a nation, sit back on national problems and expect the states to solve them one-by-one. This is a national/interstate commerce issue if there ever was one. It is not something that can be practically solved on a state by state basis any more than the FAA could be run on a state by state basis.

I appreciate the box the Cons have put themselves in regarding healthcare reform. But this whole states rights deal is nothing by a rationalization and the perpetration of it is rather disingenuous.
Click to expand...

No, they aren't I live in TX and am not subjected to the MA healthcare system where I would be subjected to Obamacare. You don't seem to understand the difference.I would fix the problem by first billing other countries for their illegal residents using our ER services or deduct it from foreign aid. Then I would open healthcare up nationwide, implement tort reform, and give people incentives to shop for their own healthcare putting personal responsibility that belongs in one's own healthcare
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom