• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Is this what Romney is hiding in his Taxes???

Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
548
Reaction score
112
Location
in a van down by the river
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Romney Persona Non Grata in Italy for Bain

"Bain funneled profits through subsidiaries in Luxembourg, a common corporate strategy for avoiding income taxes in other European countries..."

"In Italy, the deals have spurred at least three books, separate legal and regulatory probes and newspaper columns alleging investors made a fortune at the expense of Italian taxpayers."

Looks like Bain screwed over Italy big time. I think Romney just lost the Italian-American vote...
 
Last edited:
Looks like Telecom Italia played dirty. Is this supposed to be a hit piece, because it's kind of weak.

Seat’s stock price had almost tripled in the three months leading up to Telecom Italia’s offer in February 2000. The technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index (CCMP) increased 160 percent in the two years leading up to the deal.
“It was sold at the peak of the Internet bubble” recalled Pellicioli, Seat’s then-CEO. “It was not pure smoke, there was a lot of real meat, but the multiple within the Internet bubble and the timing helped.”
Italian regulators raised concerns that the price was manipulated and investors traded on inside information and probed alleged conflicts of interest. Two top Telecom Italia officials also owned shares in Seat indirectly.
 
Actually the most reasonable explanation for Romney's offshore accounts seems to be that he was helping foreign corporations screw the U.S. by funneling their U.S. investments through offshore accounts and thus avoiding U.S. taxes. Apparently this is not illegal....
 
Last edited:
Actually the most reasonable explanation for Romney's offshore accounts seems to be that he was helping foreign corporations screw the U.S. by funneling their U.S. investments through offshore accounts and thus avoiding U.S. taxes. Apparently this is not illegal....

So as a smart businessman, he took legal means to maximize the earnings of his shareholders and employees, damn! thats just terrible.:lamo
 
So as a smart businessman, he took legal means to maximize the earnings of his shareholders and employees, damn! thats just terrible.:lamo

Right, by helping foreign corporations avoid paying U.S. taxes. USA USA
 
Right, by helping foreign corporations avoid paying U.S. taxes. USA USA

You said it was legal. I am sure Barry's buddy immelt of GE does it bigtime. Are these things "unethical" only when done by republicans?

I know you liberals think that everything is ok, because the end justifies the means, but your hypocrisy on this one is as obvious as the botox on pelosi's face.
 
So as a smart businessman, he took legal means to maximize the earnings of his shareholders and employees, damn! thats just terrible.:lamo

Legal does not equal "the right thing to do" by default. It's legal to watch porn and rub green jello all over your body because your hot, but I'm sure there are some conservatives that don't believe that is the "right thing to do". Sorry I didn't mean to discuss Rush Limbauh's Saturday nights :lamo
 
Legal does not equal "the right thing to do" by default. It's legal to watch porn and rub green jello all over your body because your hot, but I'm sure there are some conservatives that don't believe that is the "right thing to do". Sorry I didn't mean to discuss Rush Limbauh's Saturday nights :lamo

thats funny :lamo
 
Legal does not equal "the right thing to do" by default. It's legal to watch porn and rub green jello all over your body because your hot, but I'm sure there are some conservatives that don't believe that is the "right thing to do". Sorry I didn't mean to discuss Rush Limbauh's Saturday nights :lamo

Do you agree that GE does things that are "not the right thing to do"? You do know that the CEO of GE is head of obama's job council? you know, the council that never meets.
 
Do you agree that GE does things that are "not the right thing to do"?

Absolutely. However, just like in Romney's case of tax shelters (I guess that's what they are calling them now), it's legal. I just don't think it's the right thing to do.
 
Do you agree that GE does things that are "not the right thing to do"? You do know that the CEO of GE is head of obama's job council? you know, the council that never meets.

You know that Immelt isn't running for president, right?
 
You know that Immelt isn't running for president, right?

No, but Obama is and his actions regarding GE are not the best IMO in the "right thing to do" department.
 
No, but Obama is and his actions regarding GE are not the best IMO in the "right thing to do" department.

What are his actions regarding GE?
 
No, but Obama is and his actions regarding GE are not the best IMO in the "right thing to do" department.

You have to understand. Obama is not responsible for his known associations (i.e. Rev. Wright, Ayers, etc) but Mitt Romney's dad was in the same state with Al Capone so Mitt Romney is clearly for organized crime.
 
Why is what Romney does with his money supposed to be more important than what Obama does with mine (and yours)?
 
What are his actions regarding GE?

Taking advisment from someone who basically sent his company overseas and a corporation that paid no taxes in 2010.
 
Absolutely. However, just like in Romney's case of tax shelters (I guess that's what they are calling them now), it's legal. I just don't think it's the right thing to do.

If it is legal, why doesn't he release his tax returns?
 
He is hiding that he is actually paying for Obama's legal fees for hiding his real birth certificate and college records. I say that because Romney's tax returns are about on part with Obama's college records.
 
If it is legal, why doesn't he release his tax returns?

Probably the same reason Obama doesn't release his transcripts, because it's not required.
 
Romney Persona Non Grata in Italy for Bain

"Bain funneled profits through subsidiaries in Luxembourg, a common corporate strategy for avoiding income taxes in other European countries..."

"In Italy, the deals have spurred at least three books, separate legal and regulatory probes and newspaper columns alleging investors made a fortune at the expense of Italian taxpayers."

Looks like Bain screwed over Italy big time. I think Romney just lost the Italian-American vote...

No, none of that would be on his personal tax returns. He's not being asked to release Bain's returns, but his own.
 
He is hiding that he is actually paying for Obama's legal fees for hiding his real birth certificate and college records. I say that because Romney's tax returns are about on part with Obama's college records.

May you rephrase your statement, it didn't make any sense. Obama, went to college, do you think if he didn't go to Harvard, somebody from Harvard would have came out and said, he didn't? Why should he release his academic records, just so conservatives can say it's fake. O, he did release his birth certificate, when eveybody was screaming, he was from Kenya, but it was obviously a fake, because a sheriff in Arizonia says, "it's fake." Taxes and academic records, which one is more important. Get a better argument next time.
 
Probably the same reason Obama doesn't release his transcripts, because it's not required.

If he releases his transcripts, all the conservatives would say, "it's fake." What's the point?
 
May you rephrase your statement, it didn't make any sense. Obama, went to college, do you think if he didn't go to Harvard, somebody from Harvard would have came out and said, he didn't? Why should he release his academic records, just so conservatives can say it's fake. O, he did release his birth certificate, when eveybody was screaming, he was from Kenya, but it was obviously a fake, because a sheriff in Arizonia says, "it's fake." Taxes and academic records, which one is more important. Get a better argument next time.

Unless either one of them broke the law, neither of them matter more than crap in a pig pen.
 
Back
Top Bottom