- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 82,890
- Reaction score
- 56,778
- Location
- New Mexico
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
So... who else here is considering him over the other two?
So... who else here is considering him over the other two?
I am not in a swing state, and my state will vote send all of its votes to Obama.
I will more than likely vote Johnson.
So... who else here is considering him over the other two?
Whats the point? I guess it might send a message. But IIRC my State is pretty Blue, and its not a swing State. :shrug:
If you are in a swing state, a vote for Johnson, Paul, or anyone except Romney is a vote for Obama. If you are in a solid blue or red state and it makes you feel good to cast a protest vote, fine, do it.
What we really need is "none of the above" on every ballot. Make them keep redoing the elections until we get someone we can vote FOR.
I've got a Gary Johnson man-crush. The only thing I don't like about Gary is that he doesn't stand a chance in the face of millions of voters who think that their only choice is selecting the lesser or two evils.
I think being in the debates can change that. But getting into the debates is a monumental task inandof itself.
Can change what?
That he doesn't stand a chance? Or that he may get a few percentage points of the popular vote?
Can change what?
That he doesn't stand a chance? Or that he may get a few percentage points of the popular vote?
Debates got Jesse Ventura into the governors house with 1/10th the money of the other candidates. Debates change things.
I think if he'd been given equal footing with the other candidates for the Republican nomination he would've stood a much better chance. The man's not a crackpot, and he shouldn't have been handled by the media as if he is one.
One thing that really hurt him was how every time a debate rolled around, the rules were tweaked from the previous one so that Johnson was just barely ineligible.
I think if he'd been given equal footing with the other candidates for the Republican nomination he would've stood a much better chance. The man's not a crackpot, and he shouldn't have been handled by the media as if he is one.
One thing that really hurt him was how every time a debate rolled around, the rules were tweaked from the previous one so that Johnson was just barely ineligible.
I'm voting for Johnson.
Obama is a ?
Romney only likes Mormons.
Debates got Jesse Ventura into the governors house with 1/10th the money of the other candidates. Debates change things.
...but I'd put more stock in the Jacksonville Jaguars winning the Superbowl this year ....