• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Romney Campaign: "real" Americans don't care about Afghanistan

AdamT

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 26, 2011
Messages
17,773
Reaction score
5,746
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Apparently Romney doesn't consider members of our military and their families to be "real" Americans ... or anyone else who is concerned with our involvement in foreign wars. :shock:

When asked about Romney's Afghanistan policy (or lack thereof), senior communications advisor Tara Wall said:

Unfortunately it’s disappointing that the attacks, these recent attacks on all these issues outside of what the issues are relative to Mitt Romney [a/k/a questions about Afghanistan] are diverting away from what real Americans want to talk about. And real Americans want to talk about getting back to work.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/19/mitt-romney-afghanistan_n_1687081.html
 
You realize that is painfully dishonest spin on your part. She spoke poorly, but her point was not that those who care about Afghanistan are not real americans, but that the big issue for most americans is the economy and jobs. Why not leave the stupid crap like this to the other side and try and take the high road?
 
Apparently Romney doesn't consider members of our military and their families to be "real" Americans

That's some serious spin. Not what she said at all.

... or anyone else who is concerned with our involvement in foreign wars. :shock:

She chose her words poorly, but I think it was pretty obvious that she was just trying to keep the campaign focused on economic policy as it is by far the most important issue to the majority of the country.
 
Is this supposed to make us believe that Afghanistan has nothing to do with the US economy.
 
That in no way is what he meant and you know it.

And for f**k's sake, will you people stop making me defend Romney! ;)
 
That's some serious spin. Not what she said at all.



She chose her words poorly, but I think it was pretty obvious that she was just trying to keep the campaign focused on economic policy as it is by far the most important issue to the majority of the country.

I agree she chose her words poorly but wars do affect our spending.

"It is unknowable how long that conflict [the war in Iraq] will last. It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months." -in Feb. 2003 Rumsfeld
 
Adam: you can change your Lean from Undisclosed. Just sayin'

Anyway, that's not how it was meant at all. I'm sure there is plenty of things to be upset with Romney about, but this is not one of them and this is desperation to try and discredit him.
 
Apparently Romney doesn't consider members of our military and their families to be "real" Americans ... or anyone else who is concerned with our involvement in foreign wars. :shock:

When asked about Romney's Afghanistan policy (or lack thereof), senior communications advisor Tara Wall said:



Mitt Romney Adviser: 'Real Americans' Don't Care About Candidate's Afghanistan Policy

I am going to have to disagree with you on this one. We have seen some bad Romney spins, like the one about the "business not your own" remark of Obama, but what you are doing is a bad anti-Romney spin.

This lady did not say he believes that real Americans don't care about Afghanistan, she was there to sell the party line. The only line they feel can get them into the White House. The line as we all know is "jobs, jobs, jobs, bad Obama, jobs, jobs, very bad Obama, jobs, jobs, jobs, no more jobs under Obama, my plan is more jobs for everyone".

IMHO, that simplistic line might have worked in the pre-911 "it's the economy stupid" but we live in a post 911 world were jobs are still really important but other issues that also make up how happy people are do not get mentioned that often in Romney's speeches because in most of those subjects Obama runs rings around him.

Romney's only hope is that people think that this whole election is about how good he is at creating jobs and that the electorate forget that he is a stiff, upper class, multi millionaire, mormom, car elevator creating friend of big money who will have to work off all the money his rich buddies have donated to him by making laws that favor the people who are already filthy rich at the expense of all other Americans.
 
:lamo Only a goosestepping partisan hack could actually get that message out of what was said.

Lets see the whole the thing for those in the nose bleeds:

Unfortunately it’s disappointing that the attacks, these recent attacks on all these issues outside of what the issues are relative to Mitt Romney are diverting away from what real Americans want to talk about. And real Americans want to talk about getting back to work.

He's clearly referring to the lines of attack on Romney over the last week.
 
Okay, mea culpa. :) It is an exaggeration and I shouldn't have posted it ... this way. It just set me off reading it and I really do think it was incredibly dismissive, as in, "hey, stop trying to knock me off my talking points by talking about that little war over there that no one cares about." It also touched a nerve insofar as I'm seeing a reemergence in the Romney campaign of the BS "real" and "not real" Americans theme that Palin so offensively kicked off four years ago, with Romney himself running around the country implying ... in fact SAYING that Obama is just too "foreign" and doesn't understand America.

So suck it. :D
 
Back
Top Bottom