• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Barack Obama. The Biggest Out-Sourcer of U.S. Jobs in the Universe. Ask NASA.

Matt Foley said:
NASA = Affirmative Action jobs program. "Oh look a woman astronaut," is kinda like, "Oh look Amelia Earhart flew solo across the Atlantic even though a man did that before her."
Click to expand...

So what you're saying is that those women aren't qualified to be astronauts. NASA only hired them because they're women.
 
Deuce said:
So what you're saying is that those women aren't qualified to be astronauts. NASA only hired them because they're women.
Click to expand...

No what I'm saying is that I could give a rat's ass about Amelia Earhart, and it's a waste of money to turn NASA into an Affirmative Action program so a bunch of social-lefties can feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
 
Matt Foley said:
No what I'm saying is that I could give a rat's ass about Amelia Earhart, and it's a waste of money to turn NASA into an Affirmative Action program so a bunch of social-lefties can feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
Click to expand...

But if they're qualified then it isn't affirmative action. Why won't you say what you mean?
 
Thunder said:
and under which administration was the plan made to retire the Space Shuttle?

no, it wasn't Obama's.
Click to expand...

Well, Obama has outsourced more jobs than Romney ever could.

Can anyone say GE? A company with 300,000 employees, well over HALF work overseas and Obama has given his buddy Emanual lots of loans and even grants for green energy projects. If Obama had a brain he would leave this fire alone, because Romney can easily throw the burning timber right back in his lap.
 
AdamT said:
But if they're qualified then it isn't affirmative action. Why won't you say what you mean?
Click to expand...

I'm not saying what I mean? Are you accusing me of being politically correct?

Oh that's funny. They are LESS qualified than the caucasian male, that's why it's called affirmative action.
 
Last edited:
dontworrybehappy said:
Well, Obama has outsourced more jobs than Romney ever could.

Can anyone say GE? A company with 300,000 employees, well over HALF work overseas and Obama has given his buddy Emanual lots of loans and even grants for green energy projects. If Obama had a brain he would leave this fire alone, because Romney can easily throw the burning timber right back in his lap.
Click to expand...

Oh dear, I must have missed the memo in which it was made public that Obama had become GM of GE or had taken over the board. Before Obama started this green energy project all 300,000 GE staff must have worked in the US and because of Obama's influence all those jobs must have been outsourced in 2009/10/11 and 2012.
 
Seconds until the truth meter goes on full tilt lie...

5...4...3...2...1...
 
FactCheck.org : Sununu’s Out-of-this-World Outsourcing Claim

John Sununu claimed President Obama “outsourced a major portion of the U.S. space program to the Russians.” But it was President Bush who set NASA on a path eight years ago to retire the Space Shuttle and rely on the Russians for space travel.

“[Bush] Administration policy is to retire the shuttle in 2010 and purchase crew transport from Russia,” as then-NASA Administrator Michael Griffin once explained.
Click to expand...

AS usual, facts have a liberal bias.
 
James Cessna said:
Why are you fine with getting rid of NASA personally?

Do you not support the work they do in monitoring the health and well-being of the Earth's global environment with data from their latest Earth resources satellites?

You obvously must be a global warming "denier" or you would not believe this way!
Click to expand...

Sorry, I skimmed past this the first time. I usually like to answer direct responses. I honestly can't tell if you are serious or sarcastic here. I'm going to assume sarcastic.

...

Now that I think about it, I don't really have a good response. The logic was such a jump that I got nuthin :p
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom