• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

DNC Chair Wasserman-Shultz Invested in Swiss Banks and other Foreign Investments.

Vancemack you can stand on your head and twirl and spout all day long that a guy like romney worth hundreds of millions of dollars...has the "RIGHT" to pay less a percentage of federal tax than ME

please demonstrate that you have a higher effective tax rate than the wealthy.

he paid 13% federal taxs last year

he paid 14%, meaning that he paid a higher rate than 97% of Americans.
 
And you are instead going to vote for Obama because he doesn't take any and every loophole he can find to minimize his own tax bill?

:roll:


no im going to vote for obama cpwill...because right now today thats the only chance working america has against people that think like you...that its everyone elses fault for everything but the rich and the rich are all just honest successful sweethearts....the rich created this mess...they milked this country dry out of outsourcing and greed...they dont pay anywhere near the taxs they should have been and ROMNY proves that...and all they do is whine that everyone is screwing them....your damn right im voting for obama...
 
1) You cannot hide anything in a Swiss Bank account. We have a Treaty with Sweden that makes it against the law to do so

lol



Similarly, according to disclosure forms from 2004, Wasserman Schultz had holdings in the Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund. That fund is invested in HSBC bank (a British financial institution), Hengdeli Holdings (a Hong Kong watch company), Novo Nordisk (a Danish drug company), Volkswagen (a German auto company), Rakuten (a Japanese shipping business), Richemont Cie Financiere (a Swiss luxury goods company), and many others.

To be clear, there is nothing in Debbie Wasserman Schultz's disclosure forms to suggest that the DNC chair invested in anything illegal. But it is clear that some of her holdings had investments overseas, in Swiss banks, foreign drug companies, the state bank of India, and many other overseas holdings.

The hypocrisy, though, is clear:

Well...

A) There's a difference between hiding money in a Swiss Bank account and investing in a Swiss Bank.

B) Globalists aren't hypocrites, they say what they do and do what they say, they are traitors.
 
Last edited:
no im going to vote for obama cpwill...because right now today thats the only chance working america has against people that think like you...

you mean people like me who think cop-killing is horrid, and that we shouldn't cut medicare for current or lower-income seniors?

that its everyone elses fault for everything but the rich and the rich are all just honest successful sweethearts....

Nah. The rich are people like you and me. Most of them are just more successful.

the rich created this mess...they milked this country dry out of outsourcing and greed...

Bull. Everyone had a hand in creating the mortgage bubble, everyone got greedy and wanted something for nothing.

My uncle built a business from the ground up. Started living in a trailer with a wife and a brand new daughter, no college education, just honest, hard, high quality blue collar labor. Now he's a multi-millionaire; he's provided jobs at various times to hundreds of people, helped hundreds of families. But because he makes more than you ever did he's greedy and evil :roll:. What an utter bunch of steaming crap. No wonder they need public employee unions to really work the lines for them - they are the only ones separated enough from economic reality to fall for this idiocy.

they dont pay anywhere near the taxs they should have been and ROMNY proves that...and all they do is whine that everyone is screwing them....your damn right im voting for obama...

Yes, we know. Your union emailed you telling you to do so.



You do realize that Obama is rich? That everyone around him is rich? That he surrounds himself with and associates with the rich? That he takes advantage of all the tax breaks and loopholes that he can find?
 
Last edited:
you mean people like me who think cop-killing is horrid, and that we shouldn't cut medicare for current or lower-income seniors?

So you're not even trying to be serious. Okay. :lol:
 
translation-a mouthpiece for Obama 2012 wants to divert from Obama's failed administration and try to insinuate that Romney has done something wrong in order to get the weak minded minions of the left to whine some more

you never asked Obama to explain his associations with known terrorists, how his wife got a 200K raise once Obama won a senate seat, or how he paid his way through Columbia and HLS (or got in in the first place)


why don' t you just admit that your goal is to smear your man's opponent and stop with the phony BS?


Great post..sums it up nicely
 
no im going to vote for obama cpwill...because right now today thats the only chance working america has against people that think like you...that its everyone elses fault for everything but the rich and the rich are all just honest successful sweethearts....the rich created this mess...they milked this country dry out of outsourcing and greed...they dont pay anywhere near the taxs they should have been and ROMNY proves that...and all they do is whine that everyone is screwing them....your damn right im voting for obama...

why not just vote for a white flag of surrender.... you do know about Obama and the gun treaty that will give our gun rights to the UN.. ?
 
You mean he wants to raise your taxes by 3% on income over $250,000. Would you rather have that massive sequestration defense dept. cut go thru or pay the extra 3%?
That's the choice that incompetant President got your party into.

cut spending.. period.. no new taxes or raising of taxes for ANYONE.. its very simple
 
why not just vote for a white flag of surrender.... you do know about Obama and the gun treaty that will give our gun rights to the UN.. ?

I thought that was changed to aliens from the planet Voltar?
 
I thought that was changed to aliens from the planet Voltar?


? is this code for how much money Pelosi made on her asian investments , making poicy that woud harm us but make her money?
 
No its not illegal...but its pertinent to the character and intentions of a candidate for President of the United States...if Romny has the mentality that hes "ENTITLED" to not pay any taxs by any means possible...hes not the man to run this country. Heres a guy that made a fortune taking jobs from other americans and kept most of that fortune by paying less a tax rate that me...and you conservatives want to call that success ? The system was created by the likes of Romney for ROMNEYS....he is the embodiment of the born with the gold spoon in his ass...IM ENTITLED crowd...and he needs to be put down...he is not ordained to be president because hes RICH

You're aware that Obama took advantage of every possible loophole and accounting trick imaginable on recent tax return correct?

You are aware of this correct?

You want other people to be taxed but you don't want to be taxed yourself. Why aren't you asking that Obama pay his fair share? Or how about Pelosi, who made more than a million on Asian investments in 2011?

http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/11/n...een-1-5-million-on-asian-investments-in-2011/
 
Last edited:
You're aware that Obama took advantage of every possible loophole and accounting trick imaginable on recent tax return correct?

You are aware of this correct?

You want other people to be taxed but you don't want to be taxed yourself. Why aren't you asking that Obama pay his fair share? Or how about Pelosi, who made more than a million on Asian investments in 2011?

Nancy Pelosi made $1-5 million on Asian investments | The Daily Caller

Personally I don't care if Romney used every conceivable loophole to minimize his tax liability. That's what we expect people to do, and it's why it's silly for people to suggest that Buffett should just pay more if he thinks that the rich (and not just Buffett) should be paying more.

My only concern is that he didn't go BEYOND the already very generous tax laws and/or use offshore accounts to hide improper payments.
 
no im going to vote for obama cpwill...because right now today thats the only chance working america has against people that think like you...that its everyone elses fault for everything but the rich and the rich are all just honest successful sweethearts....the rich created this mess...they milked this country dry out of outsourcing and greed...they dont pay anywhere near the taxs they should have been and ROMNY proves that...and all they do is whine that everyone is screwing them....your damn right im voting for obama...

You must like working America out of work, with a 1% GDP, and Obama piling up debt at a rate of 6 trillion in just 4 yrs. Yep vote for Obama and get America working again.
 
You must like working America out of work, with a 1% GDP, and Obama piling up debt at a rate of 6 trillion in just 4 yrs. Yep vote for Obama and get America working again.

What is this 1% GDP you refer to? Link?
 
Personally I don't care if Romney used every conceivable loophole to minimize his tax liability. That's what we expect people to do, and it's why it's silly for people to suggest that Buffett should just pay more if he thinks that the rich (and not just Buffett) should be paying more.

My only concern is that he didn't go BEYOND the already very generous tax laws and/or use offshore accounts to hide improper payments.

I just don't get it. You have a concern, tall that to the IRS. Further, what proof do you have that he hid anything, you state Romney used offshore accounts to hide improper payments. If you know he did this, then he sure did not hide anything. So instead of all your loose and false rhetoric come up with some proof, or the subject is mute.
 
I just don't get it. You have a concern, tall that to the IRS. Further, what proof do you have that he hid anything, you state Romney used offshore accounts to hide improper payments. If you know he did this, then he sure did not hide anything. So instead of all your loose and false rhetoric come up with some proof, or the subject is mute.

No, I obviously did NOT state that he used offshore accounts to hide improper payments. What I said is that I would like more information to confirm that he didn't.

My objection is that he hasn't provided sufficient information. It isn't a very strong rebuttal to suggest that I don't have sufficient information.

And the word is moot -- not mute.
 
Last edited:
Called tax dodging..if he does it he will promote it...aside from that its a windfall only for the rich...the working class have no means to do that...
If he campaigns on ENDING those loopholes for the rich...then Ill reconsider never voting for him

You dodged the question.

What is important about the office of President of the United States that makes diversification into foreign banks so much worse than for any other political figure?

All politicians campaign. All politicians have a platform. All politicians have influence. So why is Romney bad for having a Swiss bank account, but not the leader of the Democratic National Convention?
 
in which decade are you refering to?

surely not this one.

The Obama yrs. 6 trillion added to the national debt, over 8% unemployment, and holding steady after he said by now it would be 5.6%, and just over a 1% GDP. Now that's getting working America back to work.
 
The Obama yrs. 6 trillion added to the national debt, over 8% unemployment, and holding steady after he said by now it would be 5.6%, and just over a 1% GDP. Now that's getting working America back to work.

You didn't answer the question. You frequently state, incorrectly, that we have "1% GDP". What is the basis for your claim?
 
You didn't answer the question. You frequently state, incorrectly, that we have "1% GDP". What is the basis for your claim?

The basis is called "reality"...Id say 1% is optomistic
 
No, I obviously did NOT state that he used offshore accounts to hide improper payments. What I said is that I would like more information to confirm that he didn't.

My objection is that he hasn't provided sufficient information. It isn't a very strong rebuttal to suggest that I don't have sufficient information.

And the word is moot -- not mute.

Are you referring to the information that Holder will not provide congress, and is held in contempt. I think your request is going unanswered, in spite of how much you want to dive into a persons tax records. That's the job of the IRS and I have not heard one request for documents, unlike congress issuing orders to Holder to turn over documents.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom