• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Will Romney's lack of intelligence hurt him in the election?

Well as I see it we voted in President Obama and he had not experience other than a community organizer in Chicago, so a "TYPO" is small a potato issue compared with not having any POTUS type skills, like President Obama.


But if this helps you to justfy voting for an inept president again, knock yourself out.


I will vote for Romney in November.

You are just voting for Romney because he is latino. THe white guilt is strong in you.
 
Amercia?? Seriously what an idiot.

Romney Campaign App Carries Typo in Word America - ABC News

Well maybe he is eligible for president in this country. We all know he isnt in america.

This is pretty sad that the liberals have resorted to this pety type of discussion on the site...

Does every thread started have to have a cheesy response with a similar title from the other side? Don't comments in that original thread already show your disapproval? Instead, let's cloud the site with numerous pointless threads like these, where even the OP doesn't intend his criticisms...

There's a part of the discussion rules which I don't see being stuck by with the mediation, the part about original content... taking someone else's point and attempting to turn it back on them with a mocking thread is not posting original content... Nor does posting an article that you saw on another site, without providing any new anaylis to it... That's what The Huffington Post has become... let's not continue that here...

How about people just stop posting bogus threads?
 
This is pretty sad that the liberals have resorted to this pety type of discussion on the site...
You do realize that this thread is a mock thread of one started by a CONSERVATIVE.

It's so stupid when people pretend that only liberals or only conservatives have "petty discussions." Please.
 
You are just voting for Romney because he is latino. THe white guilt is strong in you.
He probably is less Latino than Dizzy Lizzie Warren is Indian, oops - Native American, but then Obama is more minority than ether one. Isn't this affirmative action bit pretty much how we got into this mess in the first place?
 
You do realize that this thread is a mock thread of one started by a CONSERVATIVE.

It's so stupid when people pretend that only liberals or only conservatives have "petty discussions." Please.

There's a difference between someone starting a thread that you disagree with, and starting a thread with a similar title just because the other one was started by a conservative... that's what makes this so pety...

A lot of political discussion can get pety on its own already... the idea of attacking Obama on his intelligence because of a few slipped words could be classified as pety... but this type of thread brings it to a whole new level... and will ruin the quality of discussion on this site... since this thread in itself is entirely useless... it's only here as a pety comeback to someone's previous thread... leave your disapproval on the original thread, stop playing pety childish games...

(also... Im a Centrist, not a conservative... so returning back a comment about a conservative, just because I attacked a liberal tactic is pety as well, pick it up people...)
 
Last edited:
There's a difference between someone starting a thread that you disagree with, and starting a thread with a similar title just because the other one was started by a conservative... that's what makes this so pety...

A lot of political discussion can get pety on its own already... the idea of attacking Obama on his intelligence because of a few slipped words could be classified as pety... but this type of thread brings it to a whole new level... and will ruin the quality of discussion on this site... since this thread in itself is entirely useless... it's only here as a pety comeback to someone's previous thread... leave your disapproval on the original thread, stop playing pety childish games...

(also... Im a Centrist, not a conservative... so returning back a comment about a conservative, just because I attacked a liberal tactic is pety as well, pick it up people...)
The ironic thing about this post is that it's based on making petty distinctions between this thread and the thread it's mocking. And your lean has nothing to do with my comment. It was your attempt to pin the idiocy of threads like this on liberals that sparked my comment.
 
The ironic thing about this post is that it's based on making petty distinctions between this thread and the thread it's mocking. And your lean has nothing to do with my comment. It was your attempt to pin the idiocy of threads like this on liberals that sparked my comment.
Idgaf what you claim "fueled" your response, the words that you typed didn't equate to anything other than a liberal responding to a comment about liberals by blaming conservatives...

It's not making "petty" distinction, or the "heartbreakers" either... It's about pointing out a ridiculous trend where ignorant liberal posters keep responding to posts that people who are independent, centrist, libertarian, or conservative use to criticize Obama or back Romney by going and creating an entirely opposite thread with an altered title, but using the same concept...

I'm not blaming the conservatives, because I don't see conservatives doing it... I see it done by a handful of liberal posters... However, I don't think that conservative posters are above doing it, I thought I would attempt to nip it in the bud before it spread...

So if you're ashamed that liberal posters are doing this, why not criticize the fellow liberals doing it... than make a blanket assumption without any proof that conservatives are doing it?

Instead you criticize the conservative poster of the original thread which was brought up as an actual point of discussion...
 
Last edited:
Again, no experience to lean on for the job of POTUS, IMO.


You don't even have to watch TV news to know the country is going down the tubes. Only the starring-eyed dreamers believe we've gotten "hope and change" and not the shaft.

But dream on, I'll cast my vote for Romney in November and others who've brushed the "Obama stardust" from their eyes will do the same. :lol:

Well, hopefully you know more about the guy you're voting for than than you do about the guy who's been president for going on four years. :shrug:
 
You are just voting for Romney because he is latino. THe white guilt is strong in you.


Cute - but no cigar.

I'm voting for Romney because I'm still looking for "hope and change", which was promised but never delivered by our current elected officials. Time for "change" and I "hope" the electorate will boot the boobs now running the country, or should I say trying to run the country.
 
Cute - but no cigar.

I'm voting for Romney because I'm still looking for "hope and change", which was promised but never delivered by our current elected officials. Time for "change" and I "hope" the electorate will boot the boobs now running the country, or should I say trying to run the country.

Hope & Change, ran head on into Bush's Great Recession.
 
I am voting for Obama for Obamacare and women.
 
Well, hopefully you know more about the guy you're voting for than than you do about the guy who's been president for going on four years. :shrug:

Everyone should, the media actually investigates Romney and his past.
 
Romney did not need affirmative racism to get into Harvard Law or B school. a 3.96 at BYU is going to get you into just about any Law or Med school. Especially since he had an equivalent GPA at Stanford when he left for his Mission.

And what is funny is that Candidates almost always will disclose stuff that helps them. Like Romney's stellar college record and his honors law degree and top of the class MBA degree.

Now Obumble's toadies constantly talk about Obama's HL Review credentials but Obama refuses to release his undergraduate records


Trust me-if he had a 3.96 or even a 3.7 at Occidental or columbia-we'd know about it
 
Romney did not need affirmative racism to get into Harvard Law or B school. a 3.96 at BYU is going to get you into just about any Law or Med school. Especially since he had an equivalent GPA at Stanford when he left for his Mission.

And what is funny is that Candidates almost always will disclose stuff that helps them. Like Romney's stellar college record and his honors law degree and top of the class MBA degree.

Now Obumble's toadies constantly talk about Obama's HL Review credentials but Obama refuses to release his undergraduate records


Trust me-if he had a 3.96 or even a 3.7 at Occidental or columbia-we'd know about it

yes, because that is such important information for us to know to form an opinion about him 30 years later
sarcasm warning.jpg
 
yes, because that is such important information for us to know to form an opinion about him 30 years later
View attachment 67128620

Save your sarcasm for all the obama slurpers who spew idiocy by claiming Obama is the smartest man to be president. He's no where near Clinton, GHWB, Carter, Nixon among others
 
Save your sarcasm for all the obama slurpers who spew idiocy by claiming Obama is the smartest man to be president. He's no where near Clinton, GHWB, Carter, Nixon among others

are you telling us that you have formed this low opinion about Obama because of so-so grades you believe he received three decades ago?
 
are you telling us that you have formed this low opinion about Obama because of so-so grades you believe he received three decades ago?

NOt at all.
 
Romney did not need affirmative racism to get into Harvard Law or B school. a 3.96 at BYU is going to get you into just about any Law or Med school. Especially since he had an equivalent GPA at Stanford when he left for his Mission.

And what is funny is that Candidates almost always will disclose stuff that helps them. Like Romney's stellar college record and his honors law degree and top of the class MBA degree.

Now Obumble's toadies constantly talk about Obama's HL Review credentials but Obama refuses to release his undergraduate records


Trust me-if he had a 3.96 or even a 3.7 at Occidental or columbia-we'd know about it


Neither did obama. You saying obama only got in because of his race without proof is in effect racism.
 
then why your recurring focus on his grades from that long ago era?



Why do the obamatards spend so much time bragging about Obama's grades in an attempt to convince themselves he isn't an affirmative action empty suit who was elected for reasons having nothing to do with competence?
 
then why your recurring focus on his grades from that long ago era?

He has nothing to go on. Lets be honest. Mitt romney got where he is because his daddy had the money. Obama didnt have money. Now that's american exceptionalism.
 
Neither did obama. You saying obama only got in because of his race without proof is in effect racism.

racism is a constant charge from those who cannot think clearly. If Obama had the kind of college grades that white folks needed to get into top ten law schools believe me we'd have seen his records by now
 
He has nothing to go on. Lets be honest. Mitt romney got where he is because his daddy had the money. Obama didnt have money. Now that's american exceptionalism.

Horsecrap-Obama went to an expensive private school in Hawaii. Money doesn't buy you a 3.96 summa cum laude college degree or a baker scholar award at Hahvad B School
 
Back
Top Bottom