- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Environmentalist extremists might be left wing nut jobs, but the current protection for the environment are sane and necessary protective rules which should not be abolished for making a few fast bucks that we will later regret.
Why save that much money on either, make rich and filthy rich people pay the fair share that they should pay and a lot of the US's financial problems would go away. Fiscal responsibility is nice and needed but by just cutting those programs which protect the people who need it most is just foolish and will lead to disaster.
You mean he is a power hungry buddy to big business? He could care less for success. Romney has always been about his ridiculous cult and money money money money. He is the ultimate example of anti-success because for him to have success (read money and power) he has doomed thousands and thousands to utter misery.
There is nothing socialist about universal health care, there is something anti-social though about opposing it so vehemently as the republicans have been doing.
How is it bashing the rich if you expect them to pay their fair part? How is it fair if someone as filthy rich as Romney has to pay less taxes than a cop or fire-fighter?
There is no need to execute anyone, it is not a deterrent for crime, it is just some vindictive exercise of government licensed murder. Life in jail is every bit as justified and maybe even a worse punishment than death.
Why not in jails in the US? Or are you afraid water boarding and stuff like that would be prohibited there?
No, fiscal responsibility can remedy that.
You might say, parasites know a fellow parasite like Romney, who lives off the hard work of others and bleeds it dry for making a lot of cash and then plunging the people he bled dry into unemployment and poverty.
I think Kagan was a good choice and won the support of 63 of the 100 senators, including several republicans, you might not like her but I guess that is 95% political bias.
also we should drill in the AWR
And no, we should not drill in the AWR if this is not also combined with oil reducing measures and every possible protective measure to ensure no environmental protection and if it is found out to devastating to the environment it should be halted.
we get it-Eurosocialists support Obama. drilling the the AWR is a Eurosocialist issue?