• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Romney vs Putin? Are you kidding me, he's afraid of cub reporters

leftofabbie said:
Some do, clearly. Others not so much.

Quote from Mycroft in post #9: "it doesn't matter to me WHAT new information comes to light".
Click to expand...

LOL!!

Take things out of context much???

Typical lefty liberal/progressive tactics.
 
leftofabbie said:
I can't help it if the facts have a liberal bias.
Click to expand...

Facts dont have a bias at all. You thinking they do, makes you a hyper partisan.
Use your head, make cogent points, and stop with the liberal wordplay and demonization. Running down Fox news in the same thread you are running down Romney is a waste of time and energy, not to mention it makes people dimissive of your points because with your language usage, they figure you dont have one worth reading...even if you do.

Fox news isnt a news source---Fox was granted a White House Press Corps seat previously assigned to Helen (last name escapes me at the moment). Perfect example of you overplaying the demonization of Fox news. I know a lot of liberals will agree with you on this point but harping on Fox news when the OP is about Romney is lame sidetracking--stick with your main point and work that, not Fox.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Facts dont have a bias at all. You thinking they do, makes you a hyper partisan.
Use your head, make cogent points, and stop with the liberal wordplay and demonization. Running down Fox news in the same thread you are running down Romney is a waste of time and energy, not to mention it makes people dimissive of your points because with your language usage, they figure you dont have one worth reading...even if you do.

Fox news isnt a news source---Fox was granted a White House Press Corps seat previously assigned to Helen (last name escapes me at the moment). Perfect example of you overplaying the demonization of Fox news. I know a lot of liberals will agree with you on this point but harping on Fox news when the OP is about Romney is lame sidetracking--stick with your main point and work that, not Fox.
Click to expand...



Sorry, I'm not inclined to modify my style of debate just because someone who disagrees with me doesn't like it.
 
leftofabbie said:
Thank you for posting!!!
Click to expand...

and again.. how about this.. when MSNBC and all your left propoganda machine networks have Foxs rating - COMBINED..then Romney goes on youi liberal attack stations..

and again .. the links shown prove that Obama went on ONCE before being elected..and ONCE since being elected...

so wtf is your gripe?..
 
leftofabbie said:
Friday Ratings: MSNBC Beats FOX In Three Time Slots | Mediaite

Jon Stewart


on edit: my gripe is that Romney is ducking the press.
Click to expand...

But really, who cares? It's a campaign strategy. He doesn't want to get off message, so he steers clear of hostile media. <shrug> We won't be seeing much of Pres. Obama on Fox, or doing a cover shot for National Review until at least December either.

What actually surprises me is that someone on the Left thought this was a good thing to go after Romney on. It's a fake issue. No wait, on second thought it doesn't surprise me. It's election time, nobody wants to talk about real issues, especially not Democrats or Republicans.
 
AdamT said:
Oops, you just stepped in your

:failpail:

You link is to NBC, not MSNBC. It's with Brian Williams, who is about as middle-of-the-road as they come.

How about an equivalent to Bill O'Reilly, like Rachel Maddow or Ed Schultz?
Click to expand...


again..how old are you? what is your age? for anyone to say "Obamabots Maddow and Schulz" are at all objective like Bill O is just pure nonsense.. and youa re deemed MOOT and PURE FAIL is yours..
 
AdamT said:
Oops, you just stepped in your

:failpail:

You link is to NBC, not MSNBC. It's with Brian Williams, who is about as middle-of-the-road as they come.

How about an equivalent to Bill O'Reilly, like Rachel Maddow or Ed Schultz?
Click to expand...



Oh wait you think O'reilly is a conservative..... You need another bucket.



Maddow and shultz? really? :lamo



Read my question again. What did I ask, and what did I just show you.... Read slowly.... So I don't have to explain it to you.
 
AdamT said:
Oops, you just stepped in your

:failpail:

You link is to NBC, not MSNBC. It's with Brian Williams, who is about as middle-of-the-road as they come.

How about an equivalent to Bill O'Reilly, like Rachel Maddow or Ed Schultz?
Click to expand...


Biran Williams is as far left as it gets.. adults know this.. really.. that he wears a sport jacket instead of flea ridden OWS clothes does not make him "Objective" or middle of road...

do you just make stuff up? really....its a joke...each post of yours is more comedy ridden then fact filled..

let me guess Jon Stewart is objective also? LOL
 
Last edited:
ReverendHellh0und said:
Oh wait you think O'reilly is a conservative..... You need another bucket.



Maddow and shultz? really? :lamo



Read my question again. What did I ask, and what did I just show you.... Read slowly.... So I don't have to explain it to you.
Click to expand...

Yes, O'Reilly is a conservative, though I realize that like many conservatives (you, for example), he doesn't want to admit it.
 
AdamT said:
Yes, O'Reilly is a conservative, though I realize that like many conservatives (you, for example), he doesn't want to admit it.
Click to expand...

The irony of this is almost unbearable...seems like hes not the only one who cant come out and say what he is...

and OReilly is objective.. but Libs hate objectivity, objectivity equates to= right wing ...LOL.. Libs hate anything that is not left wing agenda

and again very simple question: How old are you? what is your age? it will help me to understand you.. and why doesnt everyone have their age in profile..? I am 47
 
Last edited:
ReverendHellh0und said:
Oh wait you think O'reilly is a conservative..... You need another bucket.
Click to expand...

O'Reilly is conservative, but he doesn't even come close to the depths plumbed by Limbaugh and Beck. He's a relatively middle of the road, non-knee jerker, but still fairly conservative when you get down to it.

Personally, I think O'Reilly's news coverage is less biased than the regular non-opinion news on Fox. Maybe that's just me, but even though I sometimes disagree with O'Reilly, I do respect him.
 
rocket88 said:
O'Reilly is conservative, but he doesn't even come close to the depths plumbed by Limbaugh and Beck. He's a relatively middle of the road, non-knee jerker, but still fairly conservative when you get down to it.

Personally, I think O'Reilly's news coverage is less biased than the regular non-opinion news on Fox. Maybe that's just me, but even though I sometimes disagree with O'Reilly, I do respect him.
Click to expand...

conservative how? fiscally,socially?....
 
rocket88 said:
But really, who cares? It's a campaign strategy. He doesn't want to get off message, so he steers clear of hostile media. <shrug> We won't be seeing much of Pres. Obama on Fox, or doing a cover shot for National Review until at least December either.

What actually surprises me is that someone on the Left thought this was a good thing to go after Romney on. It's a fake issue. No wait, on second thought it doesn't surprise me. It's election time, nobody wants to talk about real issues, especially not Democrats or Republicans.
Click to expand...


I consider a Presidential candidate being unwilling to take unscreened questions from the public and the press to be a very serious issue.
 
leftofabbie said:
I consider a Presidential candidate being unwilling to take unscreened questions from the public and the press to be a very serious issue.
Click to expand...

wow you must hate Obama...
 
Travis007 said:
... OReilly is objective..
Click to expand...



BWwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

Here, watch Maddow expose O'Reilly as he generates faux Fox outrage to fundraise for Romney. Watch Billo call Obama a "political terrorist" because his campaign pointed out that the national finance chair of Romney's campaign is a Romney donor. Watch them beg for money.

Watch both these clips and then tell me Bill O'Reilly is objective.


Rachel Maddow - Fox News helps raise money for Romney with fake scandal Part 1 - YouTube

Rachel Maddow - Fox News helps raise money for Romney with fake scandal Part 2 - YouTube
 
Last edited:
rocket88 said:
O'Reilly is conservative, but he doesn't even come close to the depths plumbed by Limbaugh and Beck. He's a relatively middle of the road, non-knee jerker, but still fairly conservative when you get down to it.

Personally, I think O'Reilly's news coverage is less biased than the regular non-opinion news on Fox. Maybe that's just me, but even though I sometimes disagree with O'Reilly, I do respect him.
Click to expand...

I agree. By today's standards he would be considered a moderate conservative. Of course by the standards when he started out he was a mouth breathing troglodyte.
 
leftofabbie said:
BWwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

Here, watch Maddow expose O'Reilly as he generates faux Fox outrage to fundraise for Romney. Watch Billo call Obama a "political terrorist" because his campaign pointed out that the national finance chair of Romney's campaign is a Romney donor. Watch them beg for money.

Watch both these clips and then tell me Bill O'Reilly is objective.


Rachel Maddow - Fox News helps raise money for Romney with fake scandal Part 1 - YouTube

Rachel Maddow - Fox News helps raise money for Romney with fake scandal Part 2 - YouTube
Click to expand...

Presenting Maddow as evidence that O'Reilly is not objective is not making the case, its breaking it.
 
leftofabbie said:
BWwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

Here, watch Maddow expose O'Reilly as he generates faux Fox outrage to fundraise for Romney. Watch Billo call Obama a "political terrorist" because his campaign pointed out that the national finance chair of Romney's campaign is a Romney donor. Watch them beg for money.

Watch both these clips and then tell me Bill O'Reilly is objective.


Rachel Maddow - Fox News helps raise money for Romney with fake scandal Part 1 - YouTube

Rachel Maddow - Fox News helps raise money for Romney with fake scandal Part 2 - YouTube
Click to expand...


Its simply impossible to take you serious...thank you for all you do to prove the other side correct
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom