• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Poll: 40 percent say Obama's gay marriage stance will affect vote

Has anyone yet noticed Obama "said and did nothing " on this issue, but the normal , "punt back to state"....

Your right nothing has changed and once he is out in November none of this will matter although he will probably evolve in reverse this time.....
 
Assume is a word I rarely use

Just because you don't use the word doesn't mean you aren't performing the action. Which is exactly what you were doing when suggesting that the staffer filled out the form in compliance with Obama's position.
 
Last edited:
In 1996 when he was running for the senate he was pro gay marriage.....give me a break.....

Still doesn't make what you said any less of misleading or just plain ignorant of what his stated stance as President has been.
 
2/3s of american believe Obama came out for gay marriage strictly for political reasons not conviction. Hes already stated he will not pursue gay marriage legislation if he is re elected...he said its in the hands of congress...and we know where its going with this congress...nowhere....the only way there will be a federal mandate for gay marriage is via supreme court in the next 12 yrs or so...."IF" one more conservative judge doesnt get appointed and change that balance

Will it hurt his re election? I doubt it will have any real impact by november...
 
2/3s of american believe Obama came out for gay marriage strictly for political reasons not conviction. Hes already stated he will not pursue gay marriage legislation if he is re elected...he said its in the hands of congress...and we know where its going with this congress...nowhere....the only way there will be a federal mandate for gay marriage is via supreme court in the next 12 yrs or so...."IF" one more conservative judge doesnt get appointed and change that balance

Will it hurt his re election? I doubt it will have any real impact by november...

Mostly accurate. Though it would be a conservative judge who would make the difference FOR gay marriage on the current court.
 
Just because you don't use the word doesn't mean you aren't performing the action. Which is exactly what you were doing when suggesting that the staffer filled out the form in compliance with Obama's position.

He worked for Hussein Obama for Christs sake.........That is what staffers do..............
 
He worked for Hussein Obama for Christs sake.........That is what staffers do..............

Assumption again that the staffer filled out the form in compliance with what candidate Barack Obama said.
 
Assumption again that the staffer filled out the form in compliance with what candidate Barack Obama said.


Man you are unbelieveable.....If Huseein Obama made out his pay checks that would not happen........
 
Man you are unbelieveable.....If Huseein Obama made out his pay checks that would not happen........

Again, an assumption. People who are paid make mistakes all the time. They do things without permission of their employer all the time. You're desperate to cling to this assumption. Why?
 
Again, an assumption. People who are paid make mistakes all the time. They do things without permission of their employer all the time. You're desperate to cling to this assumption. Why?

Sure they do but to mak a monumental mistake like this is not acceptable........To say that he was pro gay marriage when he wasn't is inecuseable........Besides any statement like that which is a change in his beliefs...........He would definitely review it before it was published....To believe anything else is ridiculous..........

He was pro gay marriage in 1996 and is pro gay marriage now and has always been pro gay marriage.....
 
Back
Top Bottom