• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Four reasons Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign had a bad week

Navy Pride

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
39,883
Reaction score
3,070
Location
Pacific NW
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Four reasons Obama

If you don’t believe rigid mathematical formulas can tell you who will win a presidential election—and I don’t—you should be even more dubious about hunches divined from a stray incident or two.

So why do I have the feeling that just such an incident—OK, make it four—made last week a very bad one for President Barack Obama’s re-election prospects?

Because they connect to much bigger problems that go to the heart of the Obama campaign’s arguments for a second term. Moreover, the time to repair these problems is rapidly running out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I remember four years ago when all the liberals were bashing Palin. She couldn't have been any worse at VP than Biden.
 
I remember four years ago when all the liberals were bashing Palin. She couldn't have been any worse at VP than Biden.

thats so true..Biden just blamed us for the Iran nuke problem....Biden is beyond and idgit..what a disgrace
 
thats so true..Biden just blamed us for the Iran nuke problem....Biden is beyond and idgit..what a disgrace

Well historically we did **** up Iran. But histroy that makes US look like **** if often not taught... Sooooo.. In retrospect he is right..
 
Well historically we did **** up Iran. But histroy that makes US look like **** if often not taught... Sooooo.. In retrospect he is right..

Oh pullleeze.... yea thats the issue, not radical islam...
 
Oh pullleeze.... yea thats the issue, not radical islam...

Who overthrew the last democratically elected leader of Iran and installing a far right wing dictator that was opressive as ****, giving root the the Iranian revolution in response to that?
Oh yea we did!!!
So yes we did.
And oh yea we dont know if Iran even has nukes I mean even our intelligence community admitted that.
 
Who overthrew the last democratically elected leader of Iran and installing a far right wing dictator that was opressive as ****, giving root the the Iranian revolution in response to that?
Oh yea we did!!!
So yes we did.
And oh yea we dont know if Iran even has nukes I mean even our intelligence community admitted that.


and thats relevent how and how does that fit in with thei Nuke Program?...

of course radical islam is not a factor..LOL
 
and thats relevent how and how does that fit in with thei Nuke Program?...
What regime is now SUPPOSEDLY in search of nuclear weapons? The regime installed by the IRANIAN REVOLUTION which overthrew the undemocratic dictator installed by the US in response to Mosaddegh nationalizing the oil.


of course radical islam is not a factor..LOL

Blah blah blah radical Islam... The Iranian Revolution in response to US corporate imperialism is theocratic, true.
But if you look at this in retrospect there is no doubt that our past foreign policy has lead to this.
 
What regime is now SUPPOSEDLY in search of nuclear weapons? The regime installed by the IRANIAN REVOLUTION which overthrew the undemocratic dictator installed by the US in response to Mosaddegh nationalizing the oil.






Blah blah blah radical Islam... The Iranian Revolution in response to US corporate imperialism is theocratic, true.
But if you look at this in retrospect there is no doubt that our past foreign policy has lead to this.


wow.. youre view to me is out of touch..and dangerous

you doubt ajads intentions? how much proof will it take? them using the nuke?
 
wow.. youre view to me is out of touch..and dangerous

you doubt ajads intentions? how much proof will it take? them using the nuke?

I don't know that anyone is necessarily doubting nut-job's intentions. But it still hasn't been proved that Iran has nukes yet, or if they ever will. Believe be, we'll know a long time before they have any sort of operational capabilities.

But TDS is essentially correct about the origins of US-Iranian relations. Before you pooh-pooh that and make yourself look sillier, do yourself a favor and google "Operation Ajax" and "Kermit Roosevelt."

We caused the Iranian people - specifically Ahmadinejad's generation - a generation of brutal oppression at the hands of a dictator. Why in God's name would they hate us?
 
Last edited:
I don't know that anyone is necessarily doubting nut-job's intentions. But it still hasn't been proved that Iran has nukes yet, or if they ever will. Believe be, we'll know a long time before they have any sort of operational capabilities.

But TDS is essentially correct about the origins of US-Iranian relations. Before you pooh-pooh that and make yourself look sillier, do yourself a favor and google "Operation Ajax" and "Kermit Roosevelt."

We caused the Iranian people - specifically Ahmadinejad's generation - a generation of brutal oppression at the hands of a dictator. Why in God's name would they hate us?

again we casusd it?...but let me guess Iraq didnt cause its own invasion..we caused that also..LOL
 
and thats relevent how and how does that fit in with thei Nuke Program?...

of course radical islam is not a factor..LOL

Who sold them weapons so they could fund counter-revolutionaries in Nicaragua?
 
yes... really.. nobody could be worse..

Could anybody really tell the difference? Cheney re-invented the Vice-Presidency into a way to draw fire off of the President. Biden's been brilliant at that. Palin would have been too. Wouldn't have made one bit of difference.
 
Could anybody really tell the difference? Cheney re-invented the Vice-Presidency into a way to draw fire off of the President. Biden's been brilliant at that. Palin would have been too. Wouldn't have made one bit of difference.

Or Cheney was a source of strength and knowledge.. integrity'

Biden is a complete moron..
 
And so is Palin, so who would have known the difference?

of course.. she was only the Govenor of Alaska .. and if the MSM went after Obama liek they did Palin.. Obama would have been shown to be a total fraud.. at least Palin has no histgory of being a radical socialist marxist commie lover.. who studied under Alinsky.

Palin is a fine person
 
How do you think they got missile technology? It's certainly part of the issue.

Thru the Sino package with Russia and China..
 
You sure it wasn't space aliens what gave it to them? :roll:

no thats who you studied under to gather the great amount of knowledge you show here..
 
wow.. youre view to me is out of touch..and dangerous
No its historically accurate and if its dangerous then apparently our national security agencies and Israel's national security agencies view on this nation is dangerous as well...
U.S. does not believe Iran is trying to build nuclear bomb - Los Angeles Times
Special Report: Intel shows Iran nuclear threat not imminent | Reuters
Israel military chief: Iran not pursuing nuclear weapon | The Raw Story


you doubt ajads intentions? how much proof will it take? them using the nuke?
No im just not scared and trust everything the media spits at us at face value. Remember Iraq had WMDS and was perusing something dangerous "that can come in the form of a mushroom cloud"... What happened, nothing. We found nothing. We were lied to.
Also i would like to see intelegence that proves they have something before we freak the **** out and invade a country.
Also who cares if they have a WMD. Remember this line of events: AHHH THE USSR IS GOING TO GET A BOMB WERE SCREWED! What happened? Nothing. AHHHH DPRK IS GOING TO GET A BOMB THEY ARE GOING TO NUKE THE SOUTH! What happened? Nothing. Who cares if Iran gets a nuke. For ****s sake Israel has a nuke. And what happens for some retarded reason Iran would actually use a nuke (which they wont cuz 1 they dont have one and 2 its completly idiotic and they are actually rational people within the leadership of Iran) and they nuke Israel the cloud of radioactive **** is just going to come right back at them and they will literally **** themselves.
So to base everything of fear is completely idiotic, you will be nothing but a slave to fear.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom